Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults

INTRODUCTION: Self-report questionnaires to screen for symptoms of common mental disorders (CMDs) are commonly used as inexpensive, easy-to-administer tools in research and clinical practice. However, their validity to detect the presence of any CMD across cultures and languages is unclear. Psychome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Graaff, A., Cuijpers, P., Leeflang, M., Sferra, I., Uppendahl, J., Sijbrandij, M., De Vries, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567362/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.276
_version_ 1784809380988846080
author De Graaff, A.
Cuijpers, P.
Leeflang, M.
Sferra, I.
Uppendahl, J.
Sijbrandij, M.
De Vries, R.
author_facet De Graaff, A.
Cuijpers, P.
Leeflang, M.
Sferra, I.
Uppendahl, J.
Sijbrandij, M.
De Vries, R.
author_sort De Graaff, A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Self-report questionnaires to screen for symptoms of common mental disorders (CMDs) are commonly used as inexpensive, easy-to-administer tools in research and clinical practice. However, their validity to detect the presence of any CMD across cultures and languages is unclear. Psychometrically sound and brief case-finding instruments are vital for the identification of individuals with mental health needs. With the increasing number of Arabic-speaking refugees in Europe, we aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Arabic-language screening instruments. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review/meta-analysis is to synthesize the diagnostic accuracy of self-report questionnaires to detect depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Arabic-speaking populations. METHODS: Five databases were searched (inception-January 2021) (PROSPERO: CRD42018070645) for studies on the diagnostic accuracy of brief questionnaires in Arabic-speaking populations, with a clinical interview as reference standard. Data on sensitivity/specificity were extracted/calculated. Multi-threshold meta-analyses were performed (R diagmeta package). Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. RESULTS: We included 32 studies (N=4042 participants) reporting on questionnaires targeting depression/anxiety (14 questionnaires), distress (2 questionnaires), and PTSD (1 questionnaire). Optimal thresholds were identified for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; cut-off 11, sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 85.1%), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscale (cut-off 7, sensitivity 81.9%, specificity 87.6%), depression subscale (cut-off 6, sensitivity 73.0%, specificity 88.6%), and Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20; cut-off 8, sensitivity 86.0%, specificity 83.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We present optimal thresholds that can be used by clinicians and researchers for the EPDS, HADS and SRQ-20. More research on Arabic-language questionnaires, especially those targeting PTSD, is needed. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9567362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95673622022-10-17 A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults De Graaff, A. Cuijpers, P. Leeflang, M. Sferra, I. Uppendahl, J. Sijbrandij, M. De Vries, R. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Self-report questionnaires to screen for symptoms of common mental disorders (CMDs) are commonly used as inexpensive, easy-to-administer tools in research and clinical practice. However, their validity to detect the presence of any CMD across cultures and languages is unclear. Psychometrically sound and brief case-finding instruments are vital for the identification of individuals with mental health needs. With the increasing number of Arabic-speaking refugees in Europe, we aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Arabic-language screening instruments. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review/meta-analysis is to synthesize the diagnostic accuracy of self-report questionnaires to detect depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Arabic-speaking populations. METHODS: Five databases were searched (inception-January 2021) (PROSPERO: CRD42018070645) for studies on the diagnostic accuracy of brief questionnaires in Arabic-speaking populations, with a clinical interview as reference standard. Data on sensitivity/specificity were extracted/calculated. Multi-threshold meta-analyses were performed (R diagmeta package). Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. RESULTS: We included 32 studies (N=4042 participants) reporting on questionnaires targeting depression/anxiety (14 questionnaires), distress (2 questionnaires), and PTSD (1 questionnaire). Optimal thresholds were identified for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; cut-off 11, sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 85.1%), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscale (cut-off 7, sensitivity 81.9%, specificity 87.6%), depression subscale (cut-off 6, sensitivity 73.0%, specificity 88.6%), and Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20; cut-off 8, sensitivity 86.0%, specificity 83.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We present optimal thresholds that can be used by clinicians and researchers for the EPDS, HADS and SRQ-20. More research on Arabic-language questionnaires, especially those targeting PTSD, is needed. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9567362/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.276 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
De Graaff, A.
Cuijpers, P.
Leeflang, M.
Sferra, I.
Uppendahl, J.
Sijbrandij, M.
De Vries, R.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in arabic-speaking adults
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567362/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.276
work_keys_str_mv AT degraaffa asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT cuijpersp asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT leeflangm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT sferrai asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT uppendahlj asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT sijbrandijm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT devriesr asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT degraaffa systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT cuijpersp systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT leeflangm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT sferrai systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT uppendahlj systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT sijbrandijm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults
AT devriesr systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults