Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults
INTRODUCTION: Self-report questionnaires to screen for symptoms of common mental disorders (CMDs) are commonly used as inexpensive, easy-to-administer tools in research and clinical practice. However, their validity to detect the presence of any CMD across cultures and languages is unclear. Psychome...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567362/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.276 |
_version_ | 1784809380988846080 |
---|---|
author | De Graaff, A. Cuijpers, P. Leeflang, M. Sferra, I. Uppendahl, J. Sijbrandij, M. De Vries, R. |
author_facet | De Graaff, A. Cuijpers, P. Leeflang, M. Sferra, I. Uppendahl, J. Sijbrandij, M. De Vries, R. |
author_sort | De Graaff, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Self-report questionnaires to screen for symptoms of common mental disorders (CMDs) are commonly used as inexpensive, easy-to-administer tools in research and clinical practice. However, their validity to detect the presence of any CMD across cultures and languages is unclear. Psychometrically sound and brief case-finding instruments are vital for the identification of individuals with mental health needs. With the increasing number of Arabic-speaking refugees in Europe, we aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Arabic-language screening instruments. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review/meta-analysis is to synthesize the diagnostic accuracy of self-report questionnaires to detect depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Arabic-speaking populations. METHODS: Five databases were searched (inception-January 2021) (PROSPERO: CRD42018070645) for studies on the diagnostic accuracy of brief questionnaires in Arabic-speaking populations, with a clinical interview as reference standard. Data on sensitivity/specificity were extracted/calculated. Multi-threshold meta-analyses were performed (R diagmeta package). Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. RESULTS: We included 32 studies (N=4042 participants) reporting on questionnaires targeting depression/anxiety (14 questionnaires), distress (2 questionnaires), and PTSD (1 questionnaire). Optimal thresholds were identified for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; cut-off 11, sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 85.1%), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscale (cut-off 7, sensitivity 81.9%, specificity 87.6%), depression subscale (cut-off 6, sensitivity 73.0%, specificity 88.6%), and Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20; cut-off 8, sensitivity 86.0%, specificity 83.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We present optimal thresholds that can be used by clinicians and researchers for the EPDS, HADS and SRQ-20. More research on Arabic-language questionnaires, especially those targeting PTSD, is needed. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9567362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95673622022-10-17 A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults De Graaff, A. Cuijpers, P. Leeflang, M. Sferra, I. Uppendahl, J. Sijbrandij, M. De Vries, R. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Self-report questionnaires to screen for symptoms of common mental disorders (CMDs) are commonly used as inexpensive, easy-to-administer tools in research and clinical practice. However, their validity to detect the presence of any CMD across cultures and languages is unclear. Psychometrically sound and brief case-finding instruments are vital for the identification of individuals with mental health needs. With the increasing number of Arabic-speaking refugees in Europe, we aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Arabic-language screening instruments. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review/meta-analysis is to synthesize the diagnostic accuracy of self-report questionnaires to detect depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Arabic-speaking populations. METHODS: Five databases were searched (inception-January 2021) (PROSPERO: CRD42018070645) for studies on the diagnostic accuracy of brief questionnaires in Arabic-speaking populations, with a clinical interview as reference standard. Data on sensitivity/specificity were extracted/calculated. Multi-threshold meta-analyses were performed (R diagmeta package). Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. RESULTS: We included 32 studies (N=4042 participants) reporting on questionnaires targeting depression/anxiety (14 questionnaires), distress (2 questionnaires), and PTSD (1 questionnaire). Optimal thresholds were identified for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; cut-off 11, sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 85.1%), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscale (cut-off 7, sensitivity 81.9%, specificity 87.6%), depression subscale (cut-off 6, sensitivity 73.0%, specificity 88.6%), and Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20; cut-off 8, sensitivity 86.0%, specificity 83.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We present optimal thresholds that can be used by clinicians and researchers for the EPDS, HADS and SRQ-20. More research on Arabic-language questionnaires, especially those targeting PTSD, is needed. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9567362/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.276 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract De Graaff, A. Cuijpers, P. Leeflang, M. Sferra, I. Uppendahl, J. Sijbrandij, M. De Vries, R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in arabic-speaking adults |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567362/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.276 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degraaffa asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT cuijpersp asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT leeflangm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT sferrai asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT uppendahlj asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT sijbrandijm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT devriesr asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT degraaffa systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT cuijpersp systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT leeflangm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT sferrai systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT uppendahlj systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT sijbrandijm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT devriesr systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults |