Cargando…

The Puzzles Test and the Red Shapes Test as new diagnostic tools for neglect syndrome

INTRODUCTION: Neuropsychological methods for diagnosing neglect syndrome (NS) are focused on identifying the inability of patients to respond to stimuli localized in contralesional space. There are a large number of methods capable of diagnosing spatial neglect, but at the same time having various l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Propustina, V., Stepanov, G., Yurina, D., Varako, N., Kovyazina, M., Vasilyeva, S., Daminov, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567708/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2281
_version_ 1784809467744878592
author Propustina, V.
Stepanov, G.
Yurina, D.
Varako, N.
Kovyazina, M.
Vasilyeva, S.
Daminov, V.
author_facet Propustina, V.
Stepanov, G.
Yurina, D.
Varako, N.
Kovyazina, M.
Vasilyeva, S.
Daminov, V.
author_sort Propustina, V.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Neuropsychological methods for diagnosing neglect syndrome (NS) are focused on identifying the inability of patients to respond to stimuli localized in contralesional space. There are a large number of methods capable of diagnosing spatial neglect, but at the same time having various limitations and restrictions in their use. OBJECTIVES: To devise and to test universal diagnostic techniques for visuospatial neglect detection. METHODS: 1) A.R. Luria test battery; Trail Making Test (Part A); the Bells Test; 2) Authors’ methods: the Puzzles Test, the Red Shapes Test. A total of 47 patients after stroke with right hemisphere damage participated in the study and were divided into a target (18 patients with NS) and a control (29 patients without NS) groups. The Puzzles Test consists of three tasks: turning over cards, completing a sentence using cards with letters, completing a picture. The Red Shapes Test consisted in the search for a variable number of geometric shapes. Objective indicators of the study: total task completion time, the number of left omissions. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the tests to NS was examined using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Differences in the number of omissions and task completion time between patients with and without spatial neglect were statistically significant regarding all tasks: turning over cards (p=0.01), completing a sentence (p<0.001), completing a picture (p<0.001), finding geometric shapes (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The Puzzles Test and Red Shapes Test along with the foreign tests (the Bells Test, Trail Making Test) are sufficiently effective methods for spatial neglect detection. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9567708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95677082022-10-17 The Puzzles Test and the Red Shapes Test as new diagnostic tools for neglect syndrome Propustina, V. Stepanov, G. Yurina, D. Varako, N. Kovyazina, M. Vasilyeva, S. Daminov, V. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Neuropsychological methods for diagnosing neglect syndrome (NS) are focused on identifying the inability of patients to respond to stimuli localized in contralesional space. There are a large number of methods capable of diagnosing spatial neglect, but at the same time having various limitations and restrictions in their use. OBJECTIVES: To devise and to test universal diagnostic techniques for visuospatial neglect detection. METHODS: 1) A.R. Luria test battery; Trail Making Test (Part A); the Bells Test; 2) Authors’ methods: the Puzzles Test, the Red Shapes Test. A total of 47 patients after stroke with right hemisphere damage participated in the study and were divided into a target (18 patients with NS) and a control (29 patients without NS) groups. The Puzzles Test consists of three tasks: turning over cards, completing a sentence using cards with letters, completing a picture. The Red Shapes Test consisted in the search for a variable number of geometric shapes. Objective indicators of the study: total task completion time, the number of left omissions. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the tests to NS was examined using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Differences in the number of omissions and task completion time between patients with and without spatial neglect were statistically significant regarding all tasks: turning over cards (p=0.01), completing a sentence (p<0.001), completing a picture (p<0.001), finding geometric shapes (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The Puzzles Test and Red Shapes Test along with the foreign tests (the Bells Test, Trail Making Test) are sufficiently effective methods for spatial neglect detection. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9567708/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2281 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Propustina, V.
Stepanov, G.
Yurina, D.
Varako, N.
Kovyazina, M.
Vasilyeva, S.
Daminov, V.
The Puzzles Test and the Red Shapes Test as new diagnostic tools for neglect syndrome
title The Puzzles Test and the Red Shapes Test as new diagnostic tools for neglect syndrome
title_full The Puzzles Test and the Red Shapes Test as new diagnostic tools for neglect syndrome
title_fullStr The Puzzles Test and the Red Shapes Test as new diagnostic tools for neglect syndrome
title_full_unstemmed The Puzzles Test and the Red Shapes Test as new diagnostic tools for neglect syndrome
title_short The Puzzles Test and the Red Shapes Test as new diagnostic tools for neglect syndrome
title_sort puzzles test and the red shapes test as new diagnostic tools for neglect syndrome
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567708/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2281
work_keys_str_mv AT propustinav thepuzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT stepanovg thepuzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT yurinad thepuzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT varakon thepuzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT kovyazinam thepuzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT vasilyevas thepuzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT daminovv thepuzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT propustinav puzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT stepanovg puzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT yurinad puzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT varakon puzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT kovyazinam puzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT vasilyevas puzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome
AT daminovv puzzlestestandtheredshapestestasnewdiagnostictoolsforneglectsyndrome