Cargando…
Assessment of intellectual disability in Klinefelter’s Syndrome associated with other Prenatal and Perinatal risk factors. A case report
INTRODUCTION: Klinefelter’s syndrome (KS) is considered as a genetic risk factor for intellectual disability and specifically for impairment on verbal skills. Prenatal and perinatal morbidity concurrent with this diagnosis determine the entity and typology of neurodevelopmental deficits. OBJECTIVES:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567816/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1561 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Klinefelter’s syndrome (KS) is considered as a genetic risk factor for intellectual disability and specifically for impairment on verbal skills. Prenatal and perinatal morbidity concurrent with this diagnosis determine the entity and typology of neurodevelopmental deficits. OBJECTIVES: To describe the intellectual and adaptive functioning of a patient with KS and prenatal and perinatal difficulties, assessed in the Service of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Mental Health at La Paz University Hospital (Madrid). METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted of a 6 year and 7-month-old boy with diagnosis of KS (karyotype XXY), extremely low weight at birth (752 gr.), Arnold Chiari type I malformation with post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus and periventricular leukomalacia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intra-atrial septal defect, left kidney agenesis with iatrogenic adrenal insufficiency, and acute ventriculitis due to E. Coli. Neuropsychological evaluation was carried out in October 2021. Leiter-3 scale was selected due to the absence of expressive language; and his parents completed the questionnaire Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-II. RESULTS: The nonverbal intelligence quotient was observed in the very low range (full-scale IQ = 69). The result of general adaptive behavior (z = -2.83), showed very high functional disability both in the conceptual, social, and practical domains. CONCLUSIONS: The high number of causes of disability in this patient is consistent with a high degree of functional disability. Efficient evaluation sessions of intellectual performance, adaptive functioning, and necessary supports, due to the absence of expressive language and limited receptive language, are required. A specific neuropsychological evaluation profile should be established for KS. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. |
---|