Cargando…

Randomized comparative study of 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) and sham-TMS for treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia

INTRODUCTION: Insufficient efficacy of conventional treatment of auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia supports rising interest to brain stimulation techniques including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Left temporo-parietal cortex (TP3) is involved in emergence of AH, thus neuromodu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Potapov, I., Maslenikov, N., Tsukarzi, E., Mosolov, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567862/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1903
_version_ 1784809505485225984
author Potapov, I.
Maslenikov, N.
Tsukarzi, E.
Mosolov, S.
author_facet Potapov, I.
Maslenikov, N.
Tsukarzi, E.
Mosolov, S.
author_sort Potapov, I.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Insufficient efficacy of conventional treatment of auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia supports rising interest to brain stimulation techniques including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Left temporo-parietal cortex (TP3) is involved in emergence of AH, thus neuromodulation of this area might be reasonable. OBJECTIVES: Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of 2 protocols of TMS (1 Hz and cTBS) over TP3 and sham-TMS for treatment resistant AH in schizophrenia. METHODS: 76 schizophrenia (ICD-10 - F20) patients with prominent AH (PANSS P3 ≥ 4, AHRS ≥ 15), who had failed to respond to previous antipsychotic treatment, were randomized into 3 groups: 1) 1 Hz TMS (30 patients); 2) cTBS (25 patients); 3) Sham-TMS (21 patients). Sessions were performed 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Antipsychotic medication was continued throughout the study. Patients were assessed weekly with PANSS, AHRS, CDSS, CGI-S by blinded raters. The criterion of efficacy was 30% AHRS score reduction after 3 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The number of responders were 13 (43,3%) in 1 Hz TMS group, 14 (56%) – in cTBS group, 4 (19,1%) in sham-TMS group. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between 1 Hz TMS and cTBS, but each of the active protocols was more effective than sham-TMS. Treatment was generally well tolerated in all groups, nobody was discontinued the study due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Both protocols of TMS (1 Hz and cTBS) over TP3 are safe and effective in the treatment of schizophrenic patients with pharmacotherapy resistant AH. Further studies are needed. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9567862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95678622022-10-17 Randomized comparative study of 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) and sham-TMS for treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia Potapov, I. Maslenikov, N. Tsukarzi, E. Mosolov, S. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Insufficient efficacy of conventional treatment of auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia supports rising interest to brain stimulation techniques including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Left temporo-parietal cortex (TP3) is involved in emergence of AH, thus neuromodulation of this area might be reasonable. OBJECTIVES: Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of 2 protocols of TMS (1 Hz and cTBS) over TP3 and sham-TMS for treatment resistant AH in schizophrenia. METHODS: 76 schizophrenia (ICD-10 - F20) patients with prominent AH (PANSS P3 ≥ 4, AHRS ≥ 15), who had failed to respond to previous antipsychotic treatment, were randomized into 3 groups: 1) 1 Hz TMS (30 patients); 2) cTBS (25 patients); 3) Sham-TMS (21 patients). Sessions were performed 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Antipsychotic medication was continued throughout the study. Patients were assessed weekly with PANSS, AHRS, CDSS, CGI-S by blinded raters. The criterion of efficacy was 30% AHRS score reduction after 3 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The number of responders were 13 (43,3%) in 1 Hz TMS group, 14 (56%) – in cTBS group, 4 (19,1%) in sham-TMS group. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between 1 Hz TMS and cTBS, but each of the active protocols was more effective than sham-TMS. Treatment was generally well tolerated in all groups, nobody was discontinued the study due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Both protocols of TMS (1 Hz and cTBS) over TP3 are safe and effective in the treatment of schizophrenic patients with pharmacotherapy resistant AH. Further studies are needed. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9567862/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1903 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Potapov, I.
Maslenikov, N.
Tsukarzi, E.
Mosolov, S.
Randomized comparative study of 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) and sham-TMS for treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia
title Randomized comparative study of 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) and sham-TMS for treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia
title_full Randomized comparative study of 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) and sham-TMS for treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia
title_fullStr Randomized comparative study of 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) and sham-TMS for treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Randomized comparative study of 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) and sham-TMS for treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia
title_short Randomized comparative study of 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) and sham-TMS for treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia
title_sort randomized comparative study of 1-hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (tms), continuous theta-burst stimulation (ctbs) and sham-tms for treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations (ah) in schizophrenia
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567862/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1903
work_keys_str_mv AT potapovi randomizedcomparativestudyof1hztranscranialmagneticstimulationtmscontinuousthetaburststimulationctbsandshamtmsfortreatmentrefractoryauditoryhallucinationsahinschizophrenia
AT maslenikovn randomizedcomparativestudyof1hztranscranialmagneticstimulationtmscontinuousthetaburststimulationctbsandshamtmsfortreatmentrefractoryauditoryhallucinationsahinschizophrenia
AT tsukarzie randomizedcomparativestudyof1hztranscranialmagneticstimulationtmscontinuousthetaburststimulationctbsandshamtmsfortreatmentrefractoryauditoryhallucinationsahinschizophrenia
AT mosolovs randomizedcomparativestudyof1hztranscranialmagneticstimulationtmscontinuousthetaburststimulationctbsandshamtmsfortreatmentrefractoryauditoryhallucinationsahinschizophrenia