Cargando…

Personalized Care in Opioid Use Disorder maintained on Buprenorphine

INTRODUCTION: Effectiveness of buprenorphine (BUP) is moderated by medication misuse diversion and non-adherence, and poor retention and high cost. Contingency Managment has added benefit to BUP with Take-home doses as the most preferred reward by Opioid Use Disorder patients. OBJECTIVES: Examine th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elarabi, H., Marsden, J., Alghafri, H., Adem, A., Lee, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9567902/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2116
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Effectiveness of buprenorphine (BUP) is moderated by medication misuse diversion and non-adherence, and poor retention and high cost. Contingency Managment has added benefit to BUP with Take-home doses as the most preferred reward by Opioid Use Disorder patients. OBJECTIVES: Examine the clinical effectiveness of a novel incentivised medication adherence and abstinence monitoring to enable contingent access to increasing BUP take-home doses.Explore associations with opioid use and retention. Contrast characteristics of polysubstance abusers (PSA) and response to BUP, with single opioid users. METHODS: Two-arm, pragmatic, 16-week outpatient RCT of BUP maintenance.Takehome doses were provided as stepped-approach upto 4-weeks contingent of abstinence (UDS) and adherence according to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring-TDM. Primary outcome and secondard outcomes were % negative UDS for opioids anx retention, respectively. - RESULTS: Opioid % negative UDS was 76.7% (SD 25.0%) in I-AAM versus 63.5% (SD 34.7%) in TAU (13.3%; 95% [CI] 3.2%–23.3%; Cohen’s d 0.44; 95% CI 0.10–0.87). In I-AAM, 40 participants (57.1%) were retained versus 33 (46.4%) in TAU [OR: 1.54; 95% CI 0.79–2.98). PSA (73.7%, n=104) and carisprodol use increases non-fatal overdose (OR) 3.83, 95% CI 1.25 to 11.71) and 5.31, 95% CI 1.92 to 14.65], respectively. Opioid and non-opioid UDS are positively associated. BUP elimination rate (BUP-EL.R) predicts 26.5% to 65% of negative opioid UDS [Beta - 89.95, 95% CIl -154.20 to -25.70, R2 0.22]. Family enagement increases retention by 3-fold. CONCLUSIONS: BUP + incentivised TDM for contingent access to increasing take-home doses increased abstinence. BUP-EL.R seems promising in BUP treatment precision and BUP is clinically valuable in polysubstance abusers.Engaging family enhances retention. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.