Cargando…
A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy
INTRODUCTION: Supportive, nurturing relationships facilitate good health, well-being, and life satisfaction. Intimacy is crucial for developing successful relationships as it strengthens bonds between partners through the exchange of personal details, love, and affection. Despite the importance of i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568203/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2075 |
_version_ | 1784809589823242240 |
---|---|
author | Sears, M. Mcmahon, L. Crosby, C. Freihart, B. Meston, C. |
author_facet | Sears, M. Mcmahon, L. Crosby, C. Freihart, B. Meston, C. |
author_sort | Sears, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Supportive, nurturing relationships facilitate good health, well-being, and life satisfaction. Intimacy is crucial for developing successful relationships as it strengthens bonds between partners through the exchange of personal details, love, and affection. Despite the importance of intimacy in developing strong relationships, the extant research often conflates affection, trust, and sexual acts with intimacy or only considers one aspect of an intimate relationship (i.e., physical or sexual touch) . OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to clarify what elicits feelings of intimacy in men and women in order to develop a more nuanced conceptualization of intimacy for use in future research and clinical practice. METHODS: In Study 1, women and men nominated over 2,700 items that “elicited feelings of intimacy” for them. Examples of nominations included: trust, communication, touch, attraction, and sex. Trained raters condensed duplicate items and created a final list of unique nominations for use in Study 2. Study 2 identified the factor structure of the nominated items by having a new sample of participants rate the extent each item elicited intimacy for them. RESULTS: Data collection is ongoing but will be completed by December 2021. Results will be updated with an addendum after data analysis. CONCLUSIONS: will focus on gender differences in the factor structure of intimacy, how future research can avoid conflating this important construct with other relational aspects, and how a deeper understanding of intimacy can benefit treatment in clinical contexts and strengthen relationships more broadly. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9568203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95682032022-10-17 A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy Sears, M. Mcmahon, L. Crosby, C. Freihart, B. Meston, C. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Supportive, nurturing relationships facilitate good health, well-being, and life satisfaction. Intimacy is crucial for developing successful relationships as it strengthens bonds between partners through the exchange of personal details, love, and affection. Despite the importance of intimacy in developing strong relationships, the extant research often conflates affection, trust, and sexual acts with intimacy or only considers one aspect of an intimate relationship (i.e., physical or sexual touch) . OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to clarify what elicits feelings of intimacy in men and women in order to develop a more nuanced conceptualization of intimacy for use in future research and clinical practice. METHODS: In Study 1, women and men nominated over 2,700 items that “elicited feelings of intimacy” for them. Examples of nominations included: trust, communication, touch, attraction, and sex. Trained raters condensed duplicate items and created a final list of unique nominations for use in Study 2. Study 2 identified the factor structure of the nominated items by having a new sample of participants rate the extent each item elicited intimacy for them. RESULTS: Data collection is ongoing but will be completed by December 2021. Results will be updated with an addendum after data analysis. CONCLUSIONS: will focus on gender differences in the factor structure of intimacy, how future research can avoid conflating this important construct with other relational aspects, and how a deeper understanding of intimacy can benefit treatment in clinical contexts and strengthen relationships more broadly. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9568203/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2075 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Sears, M. Mcmahon, L. Crosby, C. Freihart, B. Meston, C. A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy |
title | A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy |
title_full | A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy |
title_fullStr | A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy |
title_full_unstemmed | A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy |
title_short | A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy |
title_sort | multidimensional evaluation of intimacy |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568203/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT searsm amultidimensionalevaluationofintimacy AT mcmahonl amultidimensionalevaluationofintimacy AT crosbyc amultidimensionalevaluationofintimacy AT freihartb amultidimensionalevaluationofintimacy AT mestonc amultidimensionalevaluationofintimacy AT searsm multidimensionalevaluationofintimacy AT mcmahonl multidimensionalevaluationofintimacy AT crosbyc multidimensionalevaluationofintimacy AT freihartb multidimensionalevaluationofintimacy AT mestonc multidimensionalevaluationofintimacy |