Cargando…

A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy

INTRODUCTION: Supportive, nurturing relationships facilitate good health, well-being, and life satisfaction. Intimacy is crucial for developing successful relationships as it strengthens bonds between partners through the exchange of personal details, love, and affection. Despite the importance of i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sears, M., Mcmahon, L., Crosby, C., Freihart, B., Meston, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568203/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2075
_version_ 1784809589823242240
author Sears, M.
Mcmahon, L.
Crosby, C.
Freihart, B.
Meston, C.
author_facet Sears, M.
Mcmahon, L.
Crosby, C.
Freihart, B.
Meston, C.
author_sort Sears, M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Supportive, nurturing relationships facilitate good health, well-being, and life satisfaction. Intimacy is crucial for developing successful relationships as it strengthens bonds between partners through the exchange of personal details, love, and affection. Despite the importance of intimacy in developing strong relationships, the extant research often conflates affection, trust, and sexual acts with intimacy or only considers one aspect of an intimate relationship (i.e., physical or sexual touch) . OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to clarify what elicits feelings of intimacy in men and women in order to develop a more nuanced conceptualization of intimacy for use in future research and clinical practice. METHODS: In Study 1, women and men nominated over 2,700 items that “elicited feelings of intimacy” for them. Examples of nominations included: trust, communication, touch, attraction, and sex. Trained raters condensed duplicate items and created a final list of unique nominations for use in Study 2. Study 2 identified the factor structure of the nominated items by having a new sample of participants rate the extent each item elicited intimacy for them. RESULTS: Data collection is ongoing but will be completed by December 2021. Results will be updated with an addendum after data analysis. CONCLUSIONS: will focus on gender differences in the factor structure of intimacy, how future research can avoid conflating this important construct with other relational aspects, and how a deeper understanding of intimacy can benefit treatment in clinical contexts and strengthen relationships more broadly. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9568203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95682032022-10-17 A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy Sears, M. Mcmahon, L. Crosby, C. Freihart, B. Meston, C. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Supportive, nurturing relationships facilitate good health, well-being, and life satisfaction. Intimacy is crucial for developing successful relationships as it strengthens bonds between partners through the exchange of personal details, love, and affection. Despite the importance of intimacy in developing strong relationships, the extant research often conflates affection, trust, and sexual acts with intimacy or only considers one aspect of an intimate relationship (i.e., physical or sexual touch) . OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to clarify what elicits feelings of intimacy in men and women in order to develop a more nuanced conceptualization of intimacy for use in future research and clinical practice. METHODS: In Study 1, women and men nominated over 2,700 items that “elicited feelings of intimacy” for them. Examples of nominations included: trust, communication, touch, attraction, and sex. Trained raters condensed duplicate items and created a final list of unique nominations for use in Study 2. Study 2 identified the factor structure of the nominated items by having a new sample of participants rate the extent each item elicited intimacy for them. RESULTS: Data collection is ongoing but will be completed by December 2021. Results will be updated with an addendum after data analysis. CONCLUSIONS: will focus on gender differences in the factor structure of intimacy, how future research can avoid conflating this important construct with other relational aspects, and how a deeper understanding of intimacy can benefit treatment in clinical contexts and strengthen relationships more broadly. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9568203/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2075 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Sears, M.
Mcmahon, L.
Crosby, C.
Freihart, B.
Meston, C.
A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy
title A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy
title_full A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy
title_fullStr A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy
title_full_unstemmed A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy
title_short A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy
title_sort multidimensional evaluation of intimacy
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568203/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2075
work_keys_str_mv AT searsm amultidimensionalevaluationofintimacy
AT mcmahonl amultidimensionalevaluationofintimacy
AT crosbyc amultidimensionalevaluationofintimacy
AT freihartb amultidimensionalevaluationofintimacy
AT mestonc amultidimensionalevaluationofintimacy
AT searsm multidimensionalevaluationofintimacy
AT mcmahonl multidimensionalevaluationofintimacy
AT crosbyc multidimensionalevaluationofintimacy
AT freihartb multidimensionalevaluationofintimacy
AT mestonc multidimensionalevaluationofintimacy