Cargando…

Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system

PURPOSE: To evaluate immediate loss of reduction in patients undergoing hardware removal after arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization using a high-tensile suture tape suspensory fixation system and to identify risk factors associated with immediate loss of reduction. MA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rupp, Marco-Christopher, Kadantsev, Pavel M., Siebenlist, Sebastian, Hinz, Maximilian, Feucht, Matthias J., Pogorzelski, Jonas, Scheiderer, Bastian, Imhoff, Andreas B., Muench, Lukas N., Berthold, Daniel P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06978-5
_version_ 1784809644188762112
author Rupp, Marco-Christopher
Kadantsev, Pavel M.
Siebenlist, Sebastian
Hinz, Maximilian
Feucht, Matthias J.
Pogorzelski, Jonas
Scheiderer, Bastian
Imhoff, Andreas B.
Muench, Lukas N.
Berthold, Daniel P.
author_facet Rupp, Marco-Christopher
Kadantsev, Pavel M.
Siebenlist, Sebastian
Hinz, Maximilian
Feucht, Matthias J.
Pogorzelski, Jonas
Scheiderer, Bastian
Imhoff, Andreas B.
Muench, Lukas N.
Berthold, Daniel P.
author_sort Rupp, Marco-Christopher
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate immediate loss of reduction in patients undergoing hardware removal after arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization using a high-tensile suture tape suspensory fixation system and to identify risk factors associated with immediate loss of reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients with a mean age of 36.4 ± 12.6 years (19–56), who underwent hardware removal 18.2 ± 15.0 months following arthroscopically assisted stabilization surgery using a suspensory fixation system for AC joint injury between 01/2012 and 01/2021 were enrolled in this retrospective monocentric study. The coracoclavicular distance (CCD) as well as the clavicular dislocation/acromial thickness (D/A) ratio were measured on anterior–posterior radiographs prior to hardware removal and immediately postoperatively by two independent raters. Loss of reduction, defined as 10% increase in the CCD, was deemed substantial if the CCD increased 6 mm compared to preoperatively. Constitutional and surgical characteristics were assessed in a subgroup analysis to detect risk factors associated with loss of reduction. RESULTS: Postoperatively, the CCD significantly increased from 12.6 ± 3.7 mm (4.8–19.0) to 14.5 ± 3.3 mm (8.7–20.6 mm) (p < 0.001) while the D/A ratio increased from 0.4 ± 0.3 (− 0.4–0.9) to 0.6 ± 0.3 (1.1–0.1) (p = 0.034) compared to preoperatively. In 10 cases (45%), loss of reduction was identified, while a substantial loss of reduction (> 6 mm) was only observed in one patient (4.5%). A shorter time interval between index stabilization surgery and hardware removal significantly corresponded to immediate loss of reduction (11.0 ± 5.6 vs. 30.0 ± 20.8 months; p = 0.007), as hardware removal within one year following index stabilization was significantly associated with immediate loss of reduction (p = 0.027; relative risk 3.4; odds ratio 11.67). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial loss of reduction after hardware removal of a high-tensile suture tape suspensory fixation system was rare, indicating that the postoperative result of AC stabilization is not categorically at risk when performing this procedure. Even though radiological assessment of the patients showed a statistically significant immediate superior clavicular displacement after this rarely required procedure, with an increased incidence in the first year following stabilization, this may not negatively influence the results of ACJ stabilization in a clinically relevant way. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9568474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95684742022-10-16 Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system Rupp, Marco-Christopher Kadantsev, Pavel M. Siebenlist, Sebastian Hinz, Maximilian Feucht, Matthias J. Pogorzelski, Jonas Scheiderer, Bastian Imhoff, Andreas B. Muench, Lukas N. Berthold, Daniel P. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Shoulder PURPOSE: To evaluate immediate loss of reduction in patients undergoing hardware removal after arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization using a high-tensile suture tape suspensory fixation system and to identify risk factors associated with immediate loss of reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients with a mean age of 36.4 ± 12.6 years (19–56), who underwent hardware removal 18.2 ± 15.0 months following arthroscopically assisted stabilization surgery using a suspensory fixation system for AC joint injury between 01/2012 and 01/2021 were enrolled in this retrospective monocentric study. The coracoclavicular distance (CCD) as well as the clavicular dislocation/acromial thickness (D/A) ratio were measured on anterior–posterior radiographs prior to hardware removal and immediately postoperatively by two independent raters. Loss of reduction, defined as 10% increase in the CCD, was deemed substantial if the CCD increased 6 mm compared to preoperatively. Constitutional and surgical characteristics were assessed in a subgroup analysis to detect risk factors associated with loss of reduction. RESULTS: Postoperatively, the CCD significantly increased from 12.6 ± 3.7 mm (4.8–19.0) to 14.5 ± 3.3 mm (8.7–20.6 mm) (p < 0.001) while the D/A ratio increased from 0.4 ± 0.3 (− 0.4–0.9) to 0.6 ± 0.3 (1.1–0.1) (p = 0.034) compared to preoperatively. In 10 cases (45%), loss of reduction was identified, while a substantial loss of reduction (> 6 mm) was only observed in one patient (4.5%). A shorter time interval between index stabilization surgery and hardware removal significantly corresponded to immediate loss of reduction (11.0 ± 5.6 vs. 30.0 ± 20.8 months; p = 0.007), as hardware removal within one year following index stabilization was significantly associated with immediate loss of reduction (p = 0.027; relative risk 3.4; odds ratio 11.67). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial loss of reduction after hardware removal of a high-tensile suture tape suspensory fixation system was rare, indicating that the postoperative result of AC stabilization is not categorically at risk when performing this procedure. Even though radiological assessment of the patients showed a statistically significant immediate superior clavicular displacement after this rarely required procedure, with an increased incidence in the first year following stabilization, this may not negatively influence the results of ACJ stabilization in a clinically relevant way. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9568474/ /pubmed/35451639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06978-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Shoulder
Rupp, Marco-Christopher
Kadantsev, Pavel M.
Siebenlist, Sebastian
Hinz, Maximilian
Feucht, Matthias J.
Pogorzelski, Jonas
Scheiderer, Bastian
Imhoff, Andreas B.
Muench, Lukas N.
Berthold, Daniel P.
Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system
title Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system
title_full Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system
title_fullStr Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system
title_full_unstemmed Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system
title_short Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system
title_sort low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06978-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ruppmarcochristopher lowrateofsubstantiallossofreductionimmediatelyafterhardwareremovalfollowingacromioclavicularjointstabilizationusingasuspensoryfixationsystem
AT kadantsevpavelm lowrateofsubstantiallossofreductionimmediatelyafterhardwareremovalfollowingacromioclavicularjointstabilizationusingasuspensoryfixationsystem
AT siebenlistsebastian lowrateofsubstantiallossofreductionimmediatelyafterhardwareremovalfollowingacromioclavicularjointstabilizationusingasuspensoryfixationsystem
AT hinzmaximilian lowrateofsubstantiallossofreductionimmediatelyafterhardwareremovalfollowingacromioclavicularjointstabilizationusingasuspensoryfixationsystem
AT feuchtmatthiasj lowrateofsubstantiallossofreductionimmediatelyafterhardwareremovalfollowingacromioclavicularjointstabilizationusingasuspensoryfixationsystem
AT pogorzelskijonas lowrateofsubstantiallossofreductionimmediatelyafterhardwareremovalfollowingacromioclavicularjointstabilizationusingasuspensoryfixationsystem
AT scheidererbastian lowrateofsubstantiallossofreductionimmediatelyafterhardwareremovalfollowingacromioclavicularjointstabilizationusingasuspensoryfixationsystem
AT imhoffandreasb lowrateofsubstantiallossofreductionimmediatelyafterhardwareremovalfollowingacromioclavicularjointstabilizationusingasuspensoryfixationsystem
AT muenchlukasn lowrateofsubstantiallossofreductionimmediatelyafterhardwareremovalfollowingacromioclavicularjointstabilizationusingasuspensoryfixationsystem
AT bertholddanielp lowrateofsubstantiallossofreductionimmediatelyafterhardwareremovalfollowingacromioclavicularjointstabilizationusingasuspensoryfixationsystem