Cargando…
Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy vs physicians’ choice standard-of-care treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a post-approval registry study (EF-19)
PURPOSE: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy, a noninvasive, anti-mitotic treatment modality, is approved for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) and newly diagnosed GBM based on phase III, EF-11 (NCT00379470) and EF-14 (NCT00916409) studies, respectively. The EF-19 study aimed to evaluate efficacy a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36239858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00555-5 |
_version_ | 1784809680420208640 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Jay-Jiguang Goldlust, Samuel A. Kleinberg, Lawrence R. Honnorat, Jérôme Oberheim Bush, Nancy Ann Ram, Zvi |
author_facet | Zhu, Jay-Jiguang Goldlust, Samuel A. Kleinberg, Lawrence R. Honnorat, Jérôme Oberheim Bush, Nancy Ann Ram, Zvi |
author_sort | Zhu, Jay-Jiguang |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy, a noninvasive, anti-mitotic treatment modality, is approved for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) and newly diagnosed GBM based on phase III, EF-11 (NCT00379470) and EF-14 (NCT00916409) studies, respectively. The EF-19 study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of TTFields monotherapy (200 kHz) vs physicians’ choice standard of care (PC-SOC; EF-11 historical control group) in rGBM. METHODS: A prospective, post-marketing registry study of adults with supratentorial rGBM treated with TTFields therapy was conducted. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS; intent-to-treat [ITT] population) and secondary endpoint was OS per-protocol (PP). Subgroup and toxicity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Median OS (ITT population) was comparable with TTFields monotherapy vs PC-SOC (7.4 vs 6.4 months, log-rank test P = 0.053; Cox test hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.66 [0.47–0.92], P = 0.016). The upper-bound HR (95% CI) was lower than pre-defined noninferiority (1.375 threshold). In the PP population, median OS was significantly longer for TTFields monotherapy vs PC-SOC (8.1 vs 6.4 months; log-rank test P = 0.017; Cox test HR [95% CI], 0.60 [0.42–0.85], P = 0.004). TTFields therapy showed increased benefit with extended use (≥ 18 h/day [averaged over 28 days]). TTFields therapy-related adverse events (AEs) by body system were lower vs PC-SOC: mainly mild-to-moderate skin AEs. CONCLUSION: In the real-world setting, TTFields monotherapy showed comparable (ITT population) and superior (PP population) OS vs PC-SOC in rGBM. In line with previous results, TTFields therapy showed a favorable safety profile vs chemotherapy, without new safety signals/systemic effects. Trial registration: NCT01756729, registered December 20, 2012. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-022-00555-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9568629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95686292022-10-16 Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy vs physicians’ choice standard-of-care treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a post-approval registry study (EF-19) Zhu, Jay-Jiguang Goldlust, Samuel A. Kleinberg, Lawrence R. Honnorat, Jérôme Oberheim Bush, Nancy Ann Ram, Zvi Discov Oncol Research PURPOSE: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy, a noninvasive, anti-mitotic treatment modality, is approved for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) and newly diagnosed GBM based on phase III, EF-11 (NCT00379470) and EF-14 (NCT00916409) studies, respectively. The EF-19 study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of TTFields monotherapy (200 kHz) vs physicians’ choice standard of care (PC-SOC; EF-11 historical control group) in rGBM. METHODS: A prospective, post-marketing registry study of adults with supratentorial rGBM treated with TTFields therapy was conducted. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS; intent-to-treat [ITT] population) and secondary endpoint was OS per-protocol (PP). Subgroup and toxicity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Median OS (ITT population) was comparable with TTFields monotherapy vs PC-SOC (7.4 vs 6.4 months, log-rank test P = 0.053; Cox test hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.66 [0.47–0.92], P = 0.016). The upper-bound HR (95% CI) was lower than pre-defined noninferiority (1.375 threshold). In the PP population, median OS was significantly longer for TTFields monotherapy vs PC-SOC (8.1 vs 6.4 months; log-rank test P = 0.017; Cox test HR [95% CI], 0.60 [0.42–0.85], P = 0.004). TTFields therapy showed increased benefit with extended use (≥ 18 h/day [averaged over 28 days]). TTFields therapy-related adverse events (AEs) by body system were lower vs PC-SOC: mainly mild-to-moderate skin AEs. CONCLUSION: In the real-world setting, TTFields monotherapy showed comparable (ITT population) and superior (PP population) OS vs PC-SOC in rGBM. In line with previous results, TTFields therapy showed a favorable safety profile vs chemotherapy, without new safety signals/systemic effects. Trial registration: NCT01756729, registered December 20, 2012. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-022-00555-5. Springer US 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9568629/ /pubmed/36239858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00555-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Zhu, Jay-Jiguang Goldlust, Samuel A. Kleinberg, Lawrence R. Honnorat, Jérôme Oberheim Bush, Nancy Ann Ram, Zvi Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy vs physicians’ choice standard-of-care treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a post-approval registry study (EF-19) |
title | Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy vs physicians’ choice standard-of-care treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a post-approval registry study (EF-19) |
title_full | Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy vs physicians’ choice standard-of-care treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a post-approval registry study (EF-19) |
title_fullStr | Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy vs physicians’ choice standard-of-care treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a post-approval registry study (EF-19) |
title_full_unstemmed | Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy vs physicians’ choice standard-of-care treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a post-approval registry study (EF-19) |
title_short | Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy vs physicians’ choice standard-of-care treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a post-approval registry study (EF-19) |
title_sort | tumor treating fields (ttfields) therapy vs physicians’ choice standard-of-care treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a post-approval registry study (ef-19) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36239858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00555-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhujayjiguang tumortreatingfieldsttfieldstherapyvsphysicianschoicestandardofcaretreatmentinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaapostapprovalregistrystudyef19 AT goldlustsamuela tumortreatingfieldsttfieldstherapyvsphysicianschoicestandardofcaretreatmentinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaapostapprovalregistrystudyef19 AT kleinberglawrencer tumortreatingfieldsttfieldstherapyvsphysicianschoicestandardofcaretreatmentinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaapostapprovalregistrystudyef19 AT honnoratjerome tumortreatingfieldsttfieldstherapyvsphysicianschoicestandardofcaretreatmentinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaapostapprovalregistrystudyef19 AT oberheimbushnancyann tumortreatingfieldsttfieldstherapyvsphysicianschoicestandardofcaretreatmentinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaapostapprovalregistrystudyef19 AT ramzvi tumortreatingfieldsttfieldstherapyvsphysicianschoicestandardofcaretreatmentinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomaapostapprovalregistrystudyef19 |