Cargando…

Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the public interest in total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on approach by analyzing Google Trends online search volume trends between 2007 and 2021. METHODS: Data were obtained by querying the Google Trends online search tool for key terms and ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, M. Lane, Brinkman, Joseph C., Pollock, Jordan R., Deckey, David G., Makovicka, Justin L., Bingham, Joshua S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36254208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.07.017
_version_ 1784809688520458240
author Moore, M. Lane
Brinkman, Joseph C.
Pollock, Jordan R.
Deckey, David G.
Makovicka, Justin L.
Bingham, Joshua S.
author_facet Moore, M. Lane
Brinkman, Joseph C.
Pollock, Jordan R.
Deckey, David G.
Makovicka, Justin L.
Bingham, Joshua S.
author_sort Moore, M. Lane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the public interest in total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on approach by analyzing Google Trends online search volume trends between 2007 and 2021. METHODS: Data were obtained by querying the Google Trends online search tool for key terms and phrases relating to anterior, posterior, lateral, and minimally invasive approaches to THA. Data from January 2007 to December 2021 were utilized. Relative search volume (RSV) was generated for each THA approach group based on historical search volume trends in the United States. RESULTS: Over the 15-year period, Google Trends Search Data demonstrated a statistically significant increase (P < .001) in the RSV for all 4 major hip arthroplasty approaches. The growth in public interest for anterior hip arthroplasty was significantly greater than the growth for posterior (P = .02) and minimally invasive hip arthroplasty (P = .02). The difference in RSV growth between lateral and anterior approaches was not significant (P = .88). The average RSV for anterior hip arthroplasty was 59.0, which was significantly greater than the average RSV of all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: The anterior approach to hip arthroplasty has demonstrated a consistent and statistically significant increase in RSV over the past 15 years that has outpaced the increases observed in the posterior and minimally invasive approaches. Despite the increase in public awareness and interest for anterior approach hip arthroplasty, it is yet to demonstrate any long-term clinical benefits over other approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9568677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95686772022-10-16 Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis Moore, M. Lane Brinkman, Joseph C. Pollock, Jordan R. Deckey, David G. Makovicka, Justin L. Bingham, Joshua S. Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the public interest in total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on approach by analyzing Google Trends online search volume trends between 2007 and 2021. METHODS: Data were obtained by querying the Google Trends online search tool for key terms and phrases relating to anterior, posterior, lateral, and minimally invasive approaches to THA. Data from January 2007 to December 2021 were utilized. Relative search volume (RSV) was generated for each THA approach group based on historical search volume trends in the United States. RESULTS: Over the 15-year period, Google Trends Search Data demonstrated a statistically significant increase (P < .001) in the RSV for all 4 major hip arthroplasty approaches. The growth in public interest for anterior hip arthroplasty was significantly greater than the growth for posterior (P = .02) and minimally invasive hip arthroplasty (P = .02). The difference in RSV growth between lateral and anterior approaches was not significant (P = .88). The average RSV for anterior hip arthroplasty was 59.0, which was significantly greater than the average RSV of all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: The anterior approach to hip arthroplasty has demonstrated a consistent and statistically significant increase in RSV over the past 15 years that has outpaced the increases observed in the posterior and minimally invasive approaches. Despite the increase in public awareness and interest for anterior approach hip arthroplasty, it is yet to demonstrate any long-term clinical benefits over other approaches. Elsevier 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9568677/ /pubmed/36254208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.07.017 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Moore, M. Lane
Brinkman, Joseph C.
Pollock, Jordan R.
Deckey, David G.
Makovicka, Justin L.
Bingham, Joshua S.
Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis
title Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis
title_full Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis
title_fullStr Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis
title_short Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis
title_sort patients are most interested in which hip arthroplasty approach? a 15-year google trends analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36254208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.07.017
work_keys_str_mv AT mooremlane patientsaremostinterestedinwhichhiparthroplastyapproacha15yeargoogletrendsanalysis
AT brinkmanjosephc patientsaremostinterestedinwhichhiparthroplastyapproacha15yeargoogletrendsanalysis
AT pollockjordanr patientsaremostinterestedinwhichhiparthroplastyapproacha15yeargoogletrendsanalysis
AT deckeydavidg patientsaremostinterestedinwhichhiparthroplastyapproacha15yeargoogletrendsanalysis
AT makovickajustinl patientsaremostinterestedinwhichhiparthroplastyapproacha15yeargoogletrendsanalysis
AT binghamjoshuas patientsaremostinterestedinwhichhiparthroplastyapproacha15yeargoogletrendsanalysis