Cargando…

Redo aortic valve-sparing root replacement for failing autograft after the Ross procedure: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Late pulmonary autograft dilatation is observed in 10–20 % of patients after the Ross procedure, more often during the second decade of follow-up. Composite aortic root replacement with a valved conduit is the most common redo procedure. An aortic valve-sparing root repl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uspenskiy, Vladimir, Filippov, Alexey, Malashicheva, Anna, Saprankov, Valery, Irtyuga, Olga, Gordeev, Mikhail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107644
_version_ 1784809714743246848
author Uspenskiy, Vladimir
Filippov, Alexey
Malashicheva, Anna
Saprankov, Valery
Irtyuga, Olga
Gordeev, Mikhail
author_facet Uspenskiy, Vladimir
Filippov, Alexey
Malashicheva, Anna
Saprankov, Valery
Irtyuga, Olga
Gordeev, Mikhail
author_sort Uspenskiy, Vladimir
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Late pulmonary autograft dilatation is observed in 10–20 % of patients after the Ross procedure, more often during the second decade of follow-up. Composite aortic root replacement with a valved conduit is the most common redo procedure. An aortic valve-sparing root replacement does not require lifelong anticoagulation and may significantly decrease the risk of complications, associated with a valve prosthesis. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: We report a case of late pulmonary autograft dilatation developed after the Ross procedure. The annual transthoracic echocardiography after 20 years revealed severe dilatation of the pulmonary autograft, measuring 60 mm in diameter. The patient underwent a successful elective redo valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David I procedure). The aortic cross-clamp time was 144 min, and the CPB time was 181 min. The patient had an uneventful midterm postoperative course. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Late pulmonary autograft failure after the Ross procedure is a relatively rare condition, leading to repeat operation. Late autograft failure can contribute to aortic regurgitation, heart failure, and death due to ascending aortic dissection and rupture. Several research groups reported good early and midterm results of redo valve-sparing root replacement in such cases. In a reoperative valve-sparing root replacement after the Ross procedure, the portion of the native aorta with the adjacent part of the autograft may complicate the aortic root proper sizing. CONCLUSION: Redo valve-sparing root replacement (David I procedure) is a viable option in pulmonary autograft dilatation with unaffected valve leaflets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9568779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95687792022-10-16 Redo aortic valve-sparing root replacement for failing autograft after the Ross procedure: A case report Uspenskiy, Vladimir Filippov, Alexey Malashicheva, Anna Saprankov, Valery Irtyuga, Olga Gordeev, Mikhail Int J Surg Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Late pulmonary autograft dilatation is observed in 10–20 % of patients after the Ross procedure, more often during the second decade of follow-up. Composite aortic root replacement with a valved conduit is the most common redo procedure. An aortic valve-sparing root replacement does not require lifelong anticoagulation and may significantly decrease the risk of complications, associated with a valve prosthesis. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: We report a case of late pulmonary autograft dilatation developed after the Ross procedure. The annual transthoracic echocardiography after 20 years revealed severe dilatation of the pulmonary autograft, measuring 60 mm in diameter. The patient underwent a successful elective redo valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David I procedure). The aortic cross-clamp time was 144 min, and the CPB time was 181 min. The patient had an uneventful midterm postoperative course. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Late pulmonary autograft failure after the Ross procedure is a relatively rare condition, leading to repeat operation. Late autograft failure can contribute to aortic regurgitation, heart failure, and death due to ascending aortic dissection and rupture. Several research groups reported good early and midterm results of redo valve-sparing root replacement in such cases. In a reoperative valve-sparing root replacement after the Ross procedure, the portion of the native aorta with the adjacent part of the autograft may complicate the aortic root proper sizing. CONCLUSION: Redo valve-sparing root replacement (David I procedure) is a viable option in pulmonary autograft dilatation with unaffected valve leaflets. Elsevier 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9568779/ /pubmed/36162360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107644 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Uspenskiy, Vladimir
Filippov, Alexey
Malashicheva, Anna
Saprankov, Valery
Irtyuga, Olga
Gordeev, Mikhail
Redo aortic valve-sparing root replacement for failing autograft after the Ross procedure: A case report
title Redo aortic valve-sparing root replacement for failing autograft after the Ross procedure: A case report
title_full Redo aortic valve-sparing root replacement for failing autograft after the Ross procedure: A case report
title_fullStr Redo aortic valve-sparing root replacement for failing autograft after the Ross procedure: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Redo aortic valve-sparing root replacement for failing autograft after the Ross procedure: A case report
title_short Redo aortic valve-sparing root replacement for failing autograft after the Ross procedure: A case report
title_sort redo aortic valve-sparing root replacement for failing autograft after the ross procedure: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107644
work_keys_str_mv AT uspenskiyvladimir redoaorticvalvesparingrootreplacementforfailingautograftaftertherossprocedureacasereport
AT filippovalexey redoaorticvalvesparingrootreplacementforfailingautograftaftertherossprocedureacasereport
AT malashichevaanna redoaorticvalvesparingrootreplacementforfailingautograftaftertherossprocedureacasereport
AT saprankovvalery redoaorticvalvesparingrootreplacementforfailingautograftaftertherossprocedureacasereport
AT irtyugaolga redoaorticvalvesparingrootreplacementforfailingautograftaftertherossprocedureacasereport
AT gordeevmikhail redoaorticvalvesparingrootreplacementforfailingautograftaftertherossprocedureacasereport