Cargando…

Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews

BACKGROUND: Not thinking of a diagnosis is a leading cause of diagnostic error in the emergency department, resulting in delayed treatment, morbidity, and excess mortality. Electronic differential diagnostic support (EDS) results in small but significant reductions in diagnostic error. However, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sibbald, Matthew, Abdulla, Bashayer, Keuhl, Amy, Norman, Geoffrey, Monteiro, Sandra, Sherbino, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178728
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39234
_version_ 1784809724467740672
author Sibbald, Matthew
Abdulla, Bashayer
Keuhl, Amy
Norman, Geoffrey
Monteiro, Sandra
Sherbino, Jonathan
author_facet Sibbald, Matthew
Abdulla, Bashayer
Keuhl, Amy
Norman, Geoffrey
Monteiro, Sandra
Sherbino, Jonathan
author_sort Sibbald, Matthew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Not thinking of a diagnosis is a leading cause of diagnostic error in the emergency department, resulting in delayed treatment, morbidity, and excess mortality. Electronic differential diagnostic support (EDS) results in small but significant reductions in diagnostic error. However, the uptake of EDS by clinicians is limited. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand physician perceptions and barriers to the uptake of EDS within the emergency department triage process. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using a research associate to rapidly prototype an embedded EDS into the emergency department triage process. Physicians involved in the triage assessment of a busy emergency department were provided the output of an EDS based on the triage complaint by an embedded researcher to simulate an automated system that would draw from the electronic medical record. Physicians were interviewed immediately after their experience. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed by a team using open and axial coding, informed by direct content analysis. RESULTS: In all, 4 themes emerged from 14 interviews: (1) the quality of the EDS was inferred from the scope and prioritization of the diagnoses present in the EDS differential; (2) the trust of the EDS was linked to varied beliefs around the diagnostic process and potential for bias; (3) clinicians foresaw more benefit to EDS use for colleagues and trainees rather than themselves; and (4) clinicians felt strongly that EDS output should not be included in the patient record. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of an EDS into an emergency department triage process will require a system that provides diagnostic suggestions appropriate for the scope and context of the emergency department triage process, transparency of system design, and affordances for clinician beliefs about the diagnostic process and addresses clinician concern around including EDS output in the patient record.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9568817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95688172022-10-16 Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews Sibbald, Matthew Abdulla, Bashayer Keuhl, Amy Norman, Geoffrey Monteiro, Sandra Sherbino, Jonathan JMIR Hum Factors Original Paper BACKGROUND: Not thinking of a diagnosis is a leading cause of diagnostic error in the emergency department, resulting in delayed treatment, morbidity, and excess mortality. Electronic differential diagnostic support (EDS) results in small but significant reductions in diagnostic error. However, the uptake of EDS by clinicians is limited. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand physician perceptions and barriers to the uptake of EDS within the emergency department triage process. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using a research associate to rapidly prototype an embedded EDS into the emergency department triage process. Physicians involved in the triage assessment of a busy emergency department were provided the output of an EDS based on the triage complaint by an embedded researcher to simulate an automated system that would draw from the electronic medical record. Physicians were interviewed immediately after their experience. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed by a team using open and axial coding, informed by direct content analysis. RESULTS: In all, 4 themes emerged from 14 interviews: (1) the quality of the EDS was inferred from the scope and prioritization of the diagnoses present in the EDS differential; (2) the trust of the EDS was linked to varied beliefs around the diagnostic process and potential for bias; (3) clinicians foresaw more benefit to EDS use for colleagues and trainees rather than themselves; and (4) clinicians felt strongly that EDS output should not be included in the patient record. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of an EDS into an emergency department triage process will require a system that provides diagnostic suggestions appropriate for the scope and context of the emergency department triage process, transparency of system design, and affordances for clinician beliefs about the diagnostic process and addresses clinician concern around including EDS output in the patient record. JMIR Publications 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9568817/ /pubmed/36178728 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39234 Text en ©Matthew Sibbald, Bashayer Abdulla, Amy Keuhl, Geoffrey Norman, Sandra Monteiro, Jonathan Sherbino. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 30.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sibbald, Matthew
Abdulla, Bashayer
Keuhl, Amy
Norman, Geoffrey
Monteiro, Sandra
Sherbino, Jonathan
Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews
title Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews
title_full Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews
title_fullStr Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews
title_full_unstemmed Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews
title_short Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews
title_sort electronic diagnostic support in emergency physician triage: qualitative study with thematic analysis of interviews
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178728
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39234
work_keys_str_mv AT sibbaldmatthew electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews
AT abdullabashayer electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews
AT keuhlamy electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews
AT normangeoffrey electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews
AT monteirosandra electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews
AT sherbinojonathan electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews