Cargando…
Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews
BACKGROUND: Not thinking of a diagnosis is a leading cause of diagnostic error in the emergency department, resulting in delayed treatment, morbidity, and excess mortality. Electronic differential diagnostic support (EDS) results in small but significant reductions in diagnostic error. However, the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178728 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39234 |
_version_ | 1784809724467740672 |
---|---|
author | Sibbald, Matthew Abdulla, Bashayer Keuhl, Amy Norman, Geoffrey Monteiro, Sandra Sherbino, Jonathan |
author_facet | Sibbald, Matthew Abdulla, Bashayer Keuhl, Amy Norman, Geoffrey Monteiro, Sandra Sherbino, Jonathan |
author_sort | Sibbald, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Not thinking of a diagnosis is a leading cause of diagnostic error in the emergency department, resulting in delayed treatment, morbidity, and excess mortality. Electronic differential diagnostic support (EDS) results in small but significant reductions in diagnostic error. However, the uptake of EDS by clinicians is limited. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand physician perceptions and barriers to the uptake of EDS within the emergency department triage process. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using a research associate to rapidly prototype an embedded EDS into the emergency department triage process. Physicians involved in the triage assessment of a busy emergency department were provided the output of an EDS based on the triage complaint by an embedded researcher to simulate an automated system that would draw from the electronic medical record. Physicians were interviewed immediately after their experience. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed by a team using open and axial coding, informed by direct content analysis. RESULTS: In all, 4 themes emerged from 14 interviews: (1) the quality of the EDS was inferred from the scope and prioritization of the diagnoses present in the EDS differential; (2) the trust of the EDS was linked to varied beliefs around the diagnostic process and potential for bias; (3) clinicians foresaw more benefit to EDS use for colleagues and trainees rather than themselves; and (4) clinicians felt strongly that EDS output should not be included in the patient record. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of an EDS into an emergency department triage process will require a system that provides diagnostic suggestions appropriate for the scope and context of the emergency department triage process, transparency of system design, and affordances for clinician beliefs about the diagnostic process and addresses clinician concern around including EDS output in the patient record. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9568817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95688172022-10-16 Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews Sibbald, Matthew Abdulla, Bashayer Keuhl, Amy Norman, Geoffrey Monteiro, Sandra Sherbino, Jonathan JMIR Hum Factors Original Paper BACKGROUND: Not thinking of a diagnosis is a leading cause of diagnostic error in the emergency department, resulting in delayed treatment, morbidity, and excess mortality. Electronic differential diagnostic support (EDS) results in small but significant reductions in diagnostic error. However, the uptake of EDS by clinicians is limited. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand physician perceptions and barriers to the uptake of EDS within the emergency department triage process. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using a research associate to rapidly prototype an embedded EDS into the emergency department triage process. Physicians involved in the triage assessment of a busy emergency department were provided the output of an EDS based on the triage complaint by an embedded researcher to simulate an automated system that would draw from the electronic medical record. Physicians were interviewed immediately after their experience. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed by a team using open and axial coding, informed by direct content analysis. RESULTS: In all, 4 themes emerged from 14 interviews: (1) the quality of the EDS was inferred from the scope and prioritization of the diagnoses present in the EDS differential; (2) the trust of the EDS was linked to varied beliefs around the diagnostic process and potential for bias; (3) clinicians foresaw more benefit to EDS use for colleagues and trainees rather than themselves; and (4) clinicians felt strongly that EDS output should not be included in the patient record. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of an EDS into an emergency department triage process will require a system that provides diagnostic suggestions appropriate for the scope and context of the emergency department triage process, transparency of system design, and affordances for clinician beliefs about the diagnostic process and addresses clinician concern around including EDS output in the patient record. JMIR Publications 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9568817/ /pubmed/36178728 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39234 Text en ©Matthew Sibbald, Bashayer Abdulla, Amy Keuhl, Geoffrey Norman, Sandra Monteiro, Jonathan Sherbino. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 30.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Sibbald, Matthew Abdulla, Bashayer Keuhl, Amy Norman, Geoffrey Monteiro, Sandra Sherbino, Jonathan Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews |
title | Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews |
title_full | Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews |
title_fullStr | Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews |
title_short | Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews |
title_sort | electronic diagnostic support in emergency physician triage: qualitative study with thematic analysis of interviews |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178728 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sibbaldmatthew electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews AT abdullabashayer electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews AT keuhlamy electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews AT normangeoffrey electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews AT monteirosandra electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews AT sherbinojonathan electronicdiagnosticsupportinemergencyphysiciantriagequalitativestudywiththematicanalysisofinterviews |