Cargando…

Sensory substitution for orthopaedic gait rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice guideline development

INTRODUCTION: Sensory Substitution is a biofeedback intervention whereby at least sensory system is utilised to supplement environmental information which is traditionally gathered by another sense. OBJECTIVE: To present an evidence-based overview of the feasibility and effectiveness of wearable Sen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lynch, Peter, Broderick, Patrick, Monaghan, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36254278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10986
_version_ 1784809730535849984
author Lynch, Peter
Broderick, Patrick
Monaghan, Kenneth
author_facet Lynch, Peter
Broderick, Patrick
Monaghan, Kenneth
author_sort Lynch, Peter
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Sensory Substitution is a biofeedback intervention whereby at least sensory system is utilised to supplement environmental information which is traditionally gathered by another sense. OBJECTIVE: To present an evidence-based overview of the feasibility and effectiveness of wearable Sensory Substitution devices on gait outcomes in orthopaedic patient populations. METHODS: This Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis was reported according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of science and PEDro were searched for relevant published literature. Inclusion criteria limited the search strictly to patients diagnosed with an orthopaedic condition and who were randomly grouped to a Sensory Substitution intervention or conventional therapy/training or an equivalent placebo intervention. RESULTS: Nine Randomised Controlled Trials and three Crossover Trials investigating the effectiveness of Sensory Substitution supplemented gait training were identified and included participants with a variety of orthopaedic conditions. Meta-Analyses revealed positive findings of feasibility as well as statistical and clinical effect of the interventions in improving measures of gait speed, weight-bearing control, measures of functionality and subjective self-reporting. Meta-Analyses also revealed the interventions effects were not significant in the management of pain and retention of gait speed. Negatively reinforced Sensory Substitution biofeedback was statistically and clinically effective, whilst positively reinforced biofeedback was not. CONCLUSION: For orthopaedic patient populations to improve gait speed, weight-bearing control, functionality, pain and self-report measures, the authors recommend a Sensory Substitution supplemented gait training programme with negative biofeedback on performance. The intervention should be undertaken for 20 min per day, 3 days per week for 5 weeks. The intervention should coincide with structured analgesia administration to facilitate effective pain management. Limitations of the data included some low sample sizes and large age-ranges. No financial support was provided for this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9568842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95688422022-10-16 Sensory substitution for orthopaedic gait rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice guideline development Lynch, Peter Broderick, Patrick Monaghan, Kenneth Heliyon Research Article INTRODUCTION: Sensory Substitution is a biofeedback intervention whereby at least sensory system is utilised to supplement environmental information which is traditionally gathered by another sense. OBJECTIVE: To present an evidence-based overview of the feasibility and effectiveness of wearable Sensory Substitution devices on gait outcomes in orthopaedic patient populations. METHODS: This Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis was reported according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of science and PEDro were searched for relevant published literature. Inclusion criteria limited the search strictly to patients diagnosed with an orthopaedic condition and who were randomly grouped to a Sensory Substitution intervention or conventional therapy/training or an equivalent placebo intervention. RESULTS: Nine Randomised Controlled Trials and three Crossover Trials investigating the effectiveness of Sensory Substitution supplemented gait training were identified and included participants with a variety of orthopaedic conditions. Meta-Analyses revealed positive findings of feasibility as well as statistical and clinical effect of the interventions in improving measures of gait speed, weight-bearing control, measures of functionality and subjective self-reporting. Meta-Analyses also revealed the interventions effects were not significant in the management of pain and retention of gait speed. Negatively reinforced Sensory Substitution biofeedback was statistically and clinically effective, whilst positively reinforced biofeedback was not. CONCLUSION: For orthopaedic patient populations to improve gait speed, weight-bearing control, functionality, pain and self-report measures, the authors recommend a Sensory Substitution supplemented gait training programme with negative biofeedback on performance. The intervention should be undertaken for 20 min per day, 3 days per week for 5 weeks. The intervention should coincide with structured analgesia administration to facilitate effective pain management. Limitations of the data included some low sample sizes and large age-ranges. No financial support was provided for this study. Elsevier 2022-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9568842/ /pubmed/36254278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10986 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Lynch, Peter
Broderick, Patrick
Monaghan, Kenneth
Sensory substitution for orthopaedic gait rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice guideline development
title Sensory substitution for orthopaedic gait rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice guideline development
title_full Sensory substitution for orthopaedic gait rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice guideline development
title_fullStr Sensory substitution for orthopaedic gait rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice guideline development
title_full_unstemmed Sensory substitution for orthopaedic gait rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice guideline development
title_short Sensory substitution for orthopaedic gait rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice guideline development
title_sort sensory substitution for orthopaedic gait rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice guideline development
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36254278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10986
work_keys_str_mv AT lynchpeter sensorysubstitutionfororthopaedicgaitrehabilitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisforclinicalpracticeguidelinedevelopment
AT broderickpatrick sensorysubstitutionfororthopaedicgaitrehabilitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisforclinicalpracticeguidelinedevelopment
AT monaghankenneth sensorysubstitutionfororthopaedicgaitrehabilitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisforclinicalpracticeguidelinedevelopment