Cargando…

Analysis of stakeholders’ responses to the food warning labels regulation in Mexico

BACKGROUND: In Mexico, the inclusion of a front-of-pack label in the Official Mexican Standard 051 (NOM-051 for its Spanish acronym) has been widely discussed for years by different stakeholder groups. In 2019, the NOM-051 modification project was proposed, which included front-of-pack warning label...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Durán, Regina, Asmitia, Edalith, Rivera, Juan, Barquera, Simón, Tolentino-Mayo, Lizbeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36242086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00922-2
_version_ 1784809760709672960
author Durán, Regina
Asmitia, Edalith
Rivera, Juan
Barquera, Simón
Tolentino-Mayo, Lizbeth
author_facet Durán, Regina
Asmitia, Edalith
Rivera, Juan
Barquera, Simón
Tolentino-Mayo, Lizbeth
author_sort Durán, Regina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Mexico, the inclusion of a front-of-pack label in the Official Mexican Standard 051 (NOM-051 for its Spanish acronym) has been widely discussed for years by different stakeholder groups. In 2019, the NOM-051 modification project was proposed, which included front-of-pack warning labels. To be modified, it underwent a public consultation period where stakeholders sent their comments to be reviewed and considered. The purpose of this study was to analyse the stakeholders’ perspectives during the public consultation of the NOM-051 modification project. METHODS: To assess perspectives, the 795 comments available on the National Commission for Regulatory Improvement website were analysed. Identity, expectations and demands were identified from each comment using content analysis in NVivo. In addition, frequencies and percentages were obtained. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of the comments were opposed to the NOM-051 modification project. Industry and business interest nongovernmental organizations were against it; they considered that their revenues and profits would be affected. Public interest nongovernmental organizations, academia and health professionals were in favour, stating that the changes proposed are fundamental to informing consumers and improving food choices, and an essential factor in reducing the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Stakeholders in favour expected that eating habits would improve, and demanded that the front-of-pack warning label suggested in the modification proposal be maintained. CONCLUSIONS: The comments opposed to the NOM-051 modification project were consistent with the literature, indicating that food industry stakeholders use all possible arguments to interfere in public health policies. The main issues used by the food industry to discredit the NOM-051 modification project coincide with those used in other countries to stop public health policies and with those used by the tobacco industry to avoid market regulations. On the other hand, those in favour looked after the interests of the Mexican population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9568963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95689632022-10-16 Analysis of stakeholders’ responses to the food warning labels regulation in Mexico Durán, Regina Asmitia, Edalith Rivera, Juan Barquera, Simón Tolentino-Mayo, Lizbeth Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: In Mexico, the inclusion of a front-of-pack label in the Official Mexican Standard 051 (NOM-051 for its Spanish acronym) has been widely discussed for years by different stakeholder groups. In 2019, the NOM-051 modification project was proposed, which included front-of-pack warning labels. To be modified, it underwent a public consultation period where stakeholders sent their comments to be reviewed and considered. The purpose of this study was to analyse the stakeholders’ perspectives during the public consultation of the NOM-051 modification project. METHODS: To assess perspectives, the 795 comments available on the National Commission for Regulatory Improvement website were analysed. Identity, expectations and demands were identified from each comment using content analysis in NVivo. In addition, frequencies and percentages were obtained. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of the comments were opposed to the NOM-051 modification project. Industry and business interest nongovernmental organizations were against it; they considered that their revenues and profits would be affected. Public interest nongovernmental organizations, academia and health professionals were in favour, stating that the changes proposed are fundamental to informing consumers and improving food choices, and an essential factor in reducing the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Stakeholders in favour expected that eating habits would improve, and demanded that the front-of-pack warning label suggested in the modification proposal be maintained. CONCLUSIONS: The comments opposed to the NOM-051 modification project were consistent with the literature, indicating that food industry stakeholders use all possible arguments to interfere in public health policies. The main issues used by the food industry to discredit the NOM-051 modification project coincide with those used in other countries to stop public health policies and with those used by the tobacco industry to avoid market regulations. On the other hand, those in favour looked after the interests of the Mexican population. BioMed Central 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9568963/ /pubmed/36242086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00922-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Durán, Regina
Asmitia, Edalith
Rivera, Juan
Barquera, Simón
Tolentino-Mayo, Lizbeth
Analysis of stakeholders’ responses to the food warning labels regulation in Mexico
title Analysis of stakeholders’ responses to the food warning labels regulation in Mexico
title_full Analysis of stakeholders’ responses to the food warning labels regulation in Mexico
title_fullStr Analysis of stakeholders’ responses to the food warning labels regulation in Mexico
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of stakeholders’ responses to the food warning labels regulation in Mexico
title_short Analysis of stakeholders’ responses to the food warning labels regulation in Mexico
title_sort analysis of stakeholders’ responses to the food warning labels regulation in mexico
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36242086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00922-2
work_keys_str_mv AT duranregina analysisofstakeholdersresponsestothefoodwarninglabelsregulationinmexico
AT asmitiaedalith analysisofstakeholdersresponsestothefoodwarninglabelsregulationinmexico
AT riverajuan analysisofstakeholdersresponsestothefoodwarninglabelsregulationinmexico
AT barquerasimon analysisofstakeholdersresponsestothefoodwarninglabelsregulationinmexico
AT tolentinomayolizbeth analysisofstakeholdersresponsestothefoodwarninglabelsregulationinmexico