Cargando…

A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment

PURPOSE: Up to 70% of survivors report cognitive symptoms after chemotherapy. We compared two cognitive rehabilitation programs to a control group in cancer survivors. METHODS: Study population were adult cancer survivors with cognitive symptoms 6–60 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vardy, Janette L., Pond, Gregory R., Bell, Melanie L., Renton, Corrinne, Dixon, Ann, Dhillon, Haryana M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36241767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01261-5
_version_ 1784809768021393408
author Vardy, Janette L.
Pond, Gregory R.
Bell, Melanie L.
Renton, Corrinne
Dixon, Ann
Dhillon, Haryana M.
author_facet Vardy, Janette L.
Pond, Gregory R.
Bell, Melanie L.
Renton, Corrinne
Dixon, Ann
Dhillon, Haryana M.
author_sort Vardy, Janette L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Up to 70% of survivors report cognitive symptoms after chemotherapy. We compared two cognitive rehabilitation programs to a control group in cancer survivors. METHODS: Study population were adult cancer survivors with cognitive symptoms 6–60 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants randomised to: Attention Process Training (APT), Compensatory Strategy Training (CST), or control group. Active interventions comprised 6–week, 2–h/week small group sessions. Assessments: pre- and post-intervention, 6- and 12-months later. Primary outcome was change in cognitive symptoms (FACT-COG-PCI subscale) between baseline and post-intervention. Secondary endpoints included objective neuropsychological performance, Functional Impact Assessment (FIA), patient-reported outcome measures, and associations. Analyses were on an intention-to-treat basis. Analysis of covariance mixed models were used for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-five participants were randomised (APT n = 21; CST n = 24; controls n = 20): 94% breast cancer, median age 54. Median time since chemotherapy 20.7 months. FACT-COG-PCI, clinical neuropsychological T-scores, and FIA improved in all groups over time, but no significant differences between arms. On mean neuropsychological T-scores 19/65 (29%) were impaired at baseline; post-intervention impairment controls 31.3%, CST 16.7%, APT 20.0%. On FIA at baseline, nine were impaired; this decreased to three post-intervention (one/group). FACT-COG-PCI was weakly associated with neuropsychological tests (rho = 0.24, p = 0.051) at baseline, and had no association with FIA. Neuropsychological total mean T-score was moderately positively associated with FIA (rho = 0.37, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between intervention groups and controls using linear mixed models adjusted for baseline scores. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cognitive symptoms and neuropsychological test scores improve over time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-022-01261-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9568997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95689972022-10-16 A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment Vardy, Janette L. Pond, Gregory R. Bell, Melanie L. Renton, Corrinne Dixon, Ann Dhillon, Haryana M. J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: Up to 70% of survivors report cognitive symptoms after chemotherapy. We compared two cognitive rehabilitation programs to a control group in cancer survivors. METHODS: Study population were adult cancer survivors with cognitive symptoms 6–60 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants randomised to: Attention Process Training (APT), Compensatory Strategy Training (CST), or control group. Active interventions comprised 6–week, 2–h/week small group sessions. Assessments: pre- and post-intervention, 6- and 12-months later. Primary outcome was change in cognitive symptoms (FACT-COG-PCI subscale) between baseline and post-intervention. Secondary endpoints included objective neuropsychological performance, Functional Impact Assessment (FIA), patient-reported outcome measures, and associations. Analyses were on an intention-to-treat basis. Analysis of covariance mixed models were used for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-five participants were randomised (APT n = 21; CST n = 24; controls n = 20): 94% breast cancer, median age 54. Median time since chemotherapy 20.7 months. FACT-COG-PCI, clinical neuropsychological T-scores, and FIA improved in all groups over time, but no significant differences between arms. On mean neuropsychological T-scores 19/65 (29%) were impaired at baseline; post-intervention impairment controls 31.3%, CST 16.7%, APT 20.0%. On FIA at baseline, nine were impaired; this decreased to three post-intervention (one/group). FACT-COG-PCI was weakly associated with neuropsychological tests (rho = 0.24, p = 0.051) at baseline, and had no association with FIA. Neuropsychological total mean T-score was moderately positively associated with FIA (rho = 0.37, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between intervention groups and controls using linear mixed models adjusted for baseline scores. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cognitive symptoms and neuropsychological test scores improve over time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-022-01261-5. Springer US 2022-10-15 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9568997/ /pubmed/36241767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01261-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Vardy, Janette L.
Pond, Gregory R.
Bell, Melanie L.
Renton, Corrinne
Dixon, Ann
Dhillon, Haryana M.
A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment
title A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment
title_full A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment
title_fullStr A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment
title_full_unstemmed A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment
title_short A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment
title_sort randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36241767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01261-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vardyjanettel arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment
AT pondgregoryr arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment
AT bellmelaniel arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment
AT rentoncorrinne arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment
AT dixonann arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment
AT dhillonharyanam arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment
AT vardyjanettel randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment
AT pondgregoryr randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment
AT bellmelaniel randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment
AT rentoncorrinne randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment
AT dixonann randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment
AT dhillonharyanam randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment