Cargando…
A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment
PURPOSE: Up to 70% of survivors report cognitive symptoms after chemotherapy. We compared two cognitive rehabilitation programs to a control group in cancer survivors. METHODS: Study population were adult cancer survivors with cognitive symptoms 6–60 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36241767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01261-5 |
_version_ | 1784809768021393408 |
---|---|
author | Vardy, Janette L. Pond, Gregory R. Bell, Melanie L. Renton, Corrinne Dixon, Ann Dhillon, Haryana M. |
author_facet | Vardy, Janette L. Pond, Gregory R. Bell, Melanie L. Renton, Corrinne Dixon, Ann Dhillon, Haryana M. |
author_sort | Vardy, Janette L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Up to 70% of survivors report cognitive symptoms after chemotherapy. We compared two cognitive rehabilitation programs to a control group in cancer survivors. METHODS: Study population were adult cancer survivors with cognitive symptoms 6–60 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants randomised to: Attention Process Training (APT), Compensatory Strategy Training (CST), or control group. Active interventions comprised 6–week, 2–h/week small group sessions. Assessments: pre- and post-intervention, 6- and 12-months later. Primary outcome was change in cognitive symptoms (FACT-COG-PCI subscale) between baseline and post-intervention. Secondary endpoints included objective neuropsychological performance, Functional Impact Assessment (FIA), patient-reported outcome measures, and associations. Analyses were on an intention-to-treat basis. Analysis of covariance mixed models were used for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-five participants were randomised (APT n = 21; CST n = 24; controls n = 20): 94% breast cancer, median age 54. Median time since chemotherapy 20.7 months. FACT-COG-PCI, clinical neuropsychological T-scores, and FIA improved in all groups over time, but no significant differences between arms. On mean neuropsychological T-scores 19/65 (29%) were impaired at baseline; post-intervention impairment controls 31.3%, CST 16.7%, APT 20.0%. On FIA at baseline, nine were impaired; this decreased to three post-intervention (one/group). FACT-COG-PCI was weakly associated with neuropsychological tests (rho = 0.24, p = 0.051) at baseline, and had no association with FIA. Neuropsychological total mean T-score was moderately positively associated with FIA (rho = 0.37, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between intervention groups and controls using linear mixed models adjusted for baseline scores. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cognitive symptoms and neuropsychological test scores improve over time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-022-01261-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9568997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95689972022-10-16 A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment Vardy, Janette L. Pond, Gregory R. Bell, Melanie L. Renton, Corrinne Dixon, Ann Dhillon, Haryana M. J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: Up to 70% of survivors report cognitive symptoms after chemotherapy. We compared two cognitive rehabilitation programs to a control group in cancer survivors. METHODS: Study population were adult cancer survivors with cognitive symptoms 6–60 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants randomised to: Attention Process Training (APT), Compensatory Strategy Training (CST), or control group. Active interventions comprised 6–week, 2–h/week small group sessions. Assessments: pre- and post-intervention, 6- and 12-months later. Primary outcome was change in cognitive symptoms (FACT-COG-PCI subscale) between baseline and post-intervention. Secondary endpoints included objective neuropsychological performance, Functional Impact Assessment (FIA), patient-reported outcome measures, and associations. Analyses were on an intention-to-treat basis. Analysis of covariance mixed models were used for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-five participants were randomised (APT n = 21; CST n = 24; controls n = 20): 94% breast cancer, median age 54. Median time since chemotherapy 20.7 months. FACT-COG-PCI, clinical neuropsychological T-scores, and FIA improved in all groups over time, but no significant differences between arms. On mean neuropsychological T-scores 19/65 (29%) were impaired at baseline; post-intervention impairment controls 31.3%, CST 16.7%, APT 20.0%. On FIA at baseline, nine were impaired; this decreased to three post-intervention (one/group). FACT-COG-PCI was weakly associated with neuropsychological tests (rho = 0.24, p = 0.051) at baseline, and had no association with FIA. Neuropsychological total mean T-score was moderately positively associated with FIA (rho = 0.37, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between intervention groups and controls using linear mixed models adjusted for baseline scores. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cognitive symptoms and neuropsychological test scores improve over time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-022-01261-5. Springer US 2022-10-15 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9568997/ /pubmed/36241767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01261-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Vardy, Janette L. Pond, Gregory R. Bell, Melanie L. Renton, Corrinne Dixon, Ann Dhillon, Haryana M. A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment |
title | A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment |
title_full | A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment |
title_fullStr | A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment |
title_short | A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36241767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01261-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vardyjanettel arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment AT pondgregoryr arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment AT bellmelaniel arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment AT rentoncorrinne arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment AT dixonann arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment AT dhillonharyanam arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment AT vardyjanettel randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment AT pondgregoryr randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment AT bellmelaniel randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment AT rentoncorrinne randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment AT dixonann randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment AT dhillonharyanam randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtwocognitiverehabilitationapproachesforcancersurvivorswithperceivedcognitiveimpairment |