Cargando…
Potential living kidney donors’ positive experiences of an information letter from healthcare: a descriptive qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Patients who need a live donor kidney transplant (LDKT) must often ask potential donors (PLDs) themselves. This is a difficult task and healthcare could unburden them by making this first contact, ensuring also that PLDs receive correct information. We investigated how PLDs experience re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9569060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36242025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02959-5 |
_version_ | 1784809781400174592 |
---|---|
author | Lagging, Eva Larsson, Kjerstin Wadström, Jonas Krekula, Linda Gyllström Tibell, Annika |
author_facet | Lagging, Eva Larsson, Kjerstin Wadström, Jonas Krekula, Linda Gyllström Tibell, Annika |
author_sort | Lagging, Eva |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients who need a live donor kidney transplant (LDKT) must often ask potential donors (PLDs) themselves. This is a difficult task and healthcare could unburden them by making this first contact, ensuring also that PLDs receive correct information. We investigated how PLDs experience receiving a letter from healthcare about LDKT, live kidney donation, and inviting them to meet with professionals to get more information. METHODS: The letter (LD-letter) was sent to a cohort of 46 individuals, from which a purposeful sample of 15 were interviewed using a semi-structured guide covering their experience of the letter, views on being approached by healthcare, and opinions on style and content. Interviews were analyzed using conventional inductive analysis. RESULTS: We identified three categories of experiences: Category (1) Reflections on receiving the letter, contains three subcategories relating to how the letter did not induce pressure to donate, did not affect the PLD’s relationship with the patient with kidney disease, and made the letter-receiver feel important in the transplant process; Category (2) The letter creates clarification and trust, also contains three subcategories, relating to how it clarified the voluntariness of donation and neutrality of healthcare providers with respect to the PLD’s decision, elucidated the patient with kidney disease’s current stage of disease (where transplantation was approaching), and unburdened patients from the responsibility of contacting PLDs on their own; Category (3) Opinions and suggestions about the letter and further communication, with four subcategories, relating to preference of a letter as the first step for communication about LDKT, suggestions on style and content, views on following up the letter, and how open meetings about LDKT were an important information source. Furthermore, 80% of the interviewees found the letter’s information comprehensive, 67% found it easy to read and respectful, and 86% rated it as good or very good. CONCLUSION: Potential donors prefer and recommend a letter as the first step for communication regarding LD. The LD-letter unburdens patients from the task of asking PLDs and stresses the voluntariness of donation, does not leave PLDs feeling coerced or lead to negative effects in their relationship with the patient. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02959-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9569060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95690602022-10-16 Potential living kidney donors’ positive experiences of an information letter from healthcare: a descriptive qualitative study Lagging, Eva Larsson, Kjerstin Wadström, Jonas Krekula, Linda Gyllström Tibell, Annika BMC Nephrol Research BACKGROUND: Patients who need a live donor kidney transplant (LDKT) must often ask potential donors (PLDs) themselves. This is a difficult task and healthcare could unburden them by making this first contact, ensuring also that PLDs receive correct information. We investigated how PLDs experience receiving a letter from healthcare about LDKT, live kidney donation, and inviting them to meet with professionals to get more information. METHODS: The letter (LD-letter) was sent to a cohort of 46 individuals, from which a purposeful sample of 15 were interviewed using a semi-structured guide covering their experience of the letter, views on being approached by healthcare, and opinions on style and content. Interviews were analyzed using conventional inductive analysis. RESULTS: We identified three categories of experiences: Category (1) Reflections on receiving the letter, contains three subcategories relating to how the letter did not induce pressure to donate, did not affect the PLD’s relationship with the patient with kidney disease, and made the letter-receiver feel important in the transplant process; Category (2) The letter creates clarification and trust, also contains three subcategories, relating to how it clarified the voluntariness of donation and neutrality of healthcare providers with respect to the PLD’s decision, elucidated the patient with kidney disease’s current stage of disease (where transplantation was approaching), and unburdened patients from the responsibility of contacting PLDs on their own; Category (3) Opinions and suggestions about the letter and further communication, with four subcategories, relating to preference of a letter as the first step for communication about LDKT, suggestions on style and content, views on following up the letter, and how open meetings about LDKT were an important information source. Furthermore, 80% of the interviewees found the letter’s information comprehensive, 67% found it easy to read and respectful, and 86% rated it as good or very good. CONCLUSION: Potential donors prefer and recommend a letter as the first step for communication regarding LD. The LD-letter unburdens patients from the task of asking PLDs and stresses the voluntariness of donation, does not leave PLDs feeling coerced or lead to negative effects in their relationship with the patient. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02959-5. BioMed Central 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9569060/ /pubmed/36242025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02959-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lagging, Eva Larsson, Kjerstin Wadström, Jonas Krekula, Linda Gyllström Tibell, Annika Potential living kidney donors’ positive experiences of an information letter from healthcare: a descriptive qualitative study |
title | Potential living kidney donors’ positive experiences of an information letter from healthcare: a descriptive qualitative study |
title_full | Potential living kidney donors’ positive experiences of an information letter from healthcare: a descriptive qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Potential living kidney donors’ positive experiences of an information letter from healthcare: a descriptive qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Potential living kidney donors’ positive experiences of an information letter from healthcare: a descriptive qualitative study |
title_short | Potential living kidney donors’ positive experiences of an information letter from healthcare: a descriptive qualitative study |
title_sort | potential living kidney donors’ positive experiences of an information letter from healthcare: a descriptive qualitative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9569060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36242025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02959-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laggingeva potentiallivingkidneydonorspositiveexperiencesofaninformationletterfromhealthcareadescriptivequalitativestudy AT larssonkjerstin potentiallivingkidneydonorspositiveexperiencesofaninformationletterfromhealthcareadescriptivequalitativestudy AT wadstromjonas potentiallivingkidneydonorspositiveexperiencesofaninformationletterfromhealthcareadescriptivequalitativestudy AT krekulalindagyllstrom potentiallivingkidneydonorspositiveexperiencesofaninformationletterfromhealthcareadescriptivequalitativestudy AT tibellannika potentiallivingkidneydonorspositiveexperiencesofaninformationletterfromhealthcareadescriptivequalitativestudy |