Cargando…
Is Circumcision “Necessary” in Islam? A Philosophical Argument Based on Peer Disagreement
In recent years, there has been a resurgence in debates on the ethics of child genital cutting practices, both female and male, including within a Muslim context. Opponents of female genital cutting sometimes assert that the practice is not mentioned explicitly in the Qur’an as a way of implying tha...
Autor principal: | Dabbagh, Hossein |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9569283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01635-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Skeptical Arguments and Deep Disagreement
por: Melchior, Guido
Publicado: (2021) -
Two Types of Refutation in Philosophical Argumentation
por: Dutilh Novaes, Catarina
Publicado: (2022) -
Bodily Integrity and Male Circumcision: An Islamic Perspective
por: Alahmad, Ghiath, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
The Hole Argument and Some Physical and Philosophical Implications
por: Stachel, John
Publicado: (2014) -
Respect and political disagreement: Can intergroup respect reduce the biased evaluation of outgroup arguments?
por: Eschert, Silke, et al.
Publicado: (2019)