Cargando…

Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) was developed and validated to assess women’s knowledge regarding etiology, diagnosis and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI). We aimed to translate and validate a Thai versio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komon, Wanchat, Manonai, Jittima, Kijmanawat, Athasit, Silpakit, Chatchawan, Tunkoon, Bhatarachit, Jengprasert, Ketkaew, Sarit-apirak, Sirirat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9569294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34936024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05020-5
_version_ 1784809823649398784
author Komon, Wanchat
Manonai, Jittima
Kijmanawat, Athasit
Silpakit, Chatchawan
Tunkoon, Bhatarachit
Jengprasert, Ketkaew
Sarit-apirak, Sirirat
author_facet Komon, Wanchat
Manonai, Jittima
Kijmanawat, Athasit
Silpakit, Chatchawan
Tunkoon, Bhatarachit
Jengprasert, Ketkaew
Sarit-apirak, Sirirat
author_sort Komon, Wanchat
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) was developed and validated to assess women’s knowledge regarding etiology, diagnosis and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI). We aimed to translate and validate a Thai version of the PIKQ to use as a tool to evaluate knowledge of POP and UI among Thai-speaking women. METHODS: The English PIKQ, which comprises the PIKQ-POP and PIKQ-UI sections, was translated into Thai. Psychometric properties of the final version of the Thai PIKQ were tested for content validity, construct validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability among 168 women attending a gynecology clinic and 150 nurses. RESULTS: Regarding content validity of the final Thai PIKQ, the number of missing items was 0. Participants in the nurse group were more likely than those in the patient group to select the correct answer for all items for the POP scale and UI scale (P < 0.001). For internal consistency testing, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.745 for the PIKQ-POP and 0.754 for the PIKQ-UI scales, suggesting that the items had relatively high internal consistency. The item-total correlation values ranged from 0.204 to 0.539, showing an adequate correlation of each item with the scale overall. The correlation coefficients between the test and retest for PIKQ-POP and PIKQ-UI were 0.685 and 0.735, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Thai PIKQ is a simple instrument which shows good validity and high reliability and could be a useful tool for assessing knowledge regarding POP and UI in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9569294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95692942022-10-17 Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) Komon, Wanchat Manonai, Jittima Kijmanawat, Athasit Silpakit, Chatchawan Tunkoon, Bhatarachit Jengprasert, Ketkaew Sarit-apirak, Sirirat Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) was developed and validated to assess women’s knowledge regarding etiology, diagnosis and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI). We aimed to translate and validate a Thai version of the PIKQ to use as a tool to evaluate knowledge of POP and UI among Thai-speaking women. METHODS: The English PIKQ, which comprises the PIKQ-POP and PIKQ-UI sections, was translated into Thai. Psychometric properties of the final version of the Thai PIKQ were tested for content validity, construct validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability among 168 women attending a gynecology clinic and 150 nurses. RESULTS: Regarding content validity of the final Thai PIKQ, the number of missing items was 0. Participants in the nurse group were more likely than those in the patient group to select the correct answer for all items for the POP scale and UI scale (P < 0.001). For internal consistency testing, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.745 for the PIKQ-POP and 0.754 for the PIKQ-UI scales, suggesting that the items had relatively high internal consistency. The item-total correlation values ranged from 0.204 to 0.539, showing an adequate correlation of each item with the scale overall. The correlation coefficients between the test and retest for PIKQ-POP and PIKQ-UI were 0.685 and 0.735, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Thai PIKQ is a simple instrument which shows good validity and high reliability and could be a useful tool for assessing knowledge regarding POP and UI in clinical practice. Springer International Publishing 2021-12-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9569294/ /pubmed/34936024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05020-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Komon, Wanchat
Manonai, Jittima
Kijmanawat, Athasit
Silpakit, Chatchawan
Tunkoon, Bhatarachit
Jengprasert, Ketkaew
Sarit-apirak, Sirirat
Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
title Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
title_full Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
title_fullStr Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
title_short Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
title_sort validation of the thai version of the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire (pikq)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9569294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34936024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05020-5
work_keys_str_mv AT komonwanchat validationofthethaiversionoftheprolapseandincontinenceknowledgequestionnairepikq
AT manonaijittima validationofthethaiversionoftheprolapseandincontinenceknowledgequestionnairepikq
AT kijmanawatathasit validationofthethaiversionoftheprolapseandincontinenceknowledgequestionnairepikq
AT silpakitchatchawan validationofthethaiversionoftheprolapseandincontinenceknowledgequestionnairepikq
AT tunkoonbhatarachit validationofthethaiversionoftheprolapseandincontinenceknowledgequestionnairepikq
AT jengprasertketkaew validationofthethaiversionoftheprolapseandincontinenceknowledgequestionnairepikq
AT saritapiraksirirat validationofthethaiversionoftheprolapseandincontinenceknowledgequestionnairepikq