Cargando…

Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes

This study experimentally investigated the axial crushing characteristics of the hybrid tubes with the configuration of aluminum/carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) (1/1) and aluminum/CFRP/aluminum (2/1). The effects of geometry size and fiber lay-up sequence on the axial crushing energy-absorpti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ge, Fei, Lin, Yuan, Zhang, Fukai, Zhang, Zhongwei, Wang, Mingyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235982
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14194034
_version_ 1784810280337801216
author Ge, Fei
Lin, Yuan
Zhang, Fukai
Zhang, Zhongwei
Wang, Mingyang
author_facet Ge, Fei
Lin, Yuan
Zhang, Fukai
Zhang, Zhongwei
Wang, Mingyang
author_sort Ge, Fei
collection PubMed
description This study experimentally investigated the axial crushing characteristics of the hybrid tubes with the configuration of aluminum/carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) (1/1) and aluminum/CFRP/aluminum (2/1). The effects of geometry size and fiber lay-up sequence on the axial crushing energy-absorption performances and failure modes of the two types of hybrid tubes were compared. The results showed that the energy absorption of the specimens with [0°/90°] lay-up sequence was better than that of the ones with [45°/−45°] lay-up sequence for both types of hybrid tubes. The proper length of the tubes should be selected to avoid too small a length-to-diameter ratio so that a stable and controllable progressive crushing failure mode can be achieved. When the crushing failure process was relatively stable, the specific energy absorption and crushing force efficiency of the 2/1 hybrid tubes were not affected by the geometric size. The energy absorption of the hybrid tubes was higher than the sum of the energy absorption of all the corresponding individual tubes, showing a positive hybrid effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9571110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95711102022-10-17 Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes Ge, Fei Lin, Yuan Zhang, Fukai Zhang, Zhongwei Wang, Mingyang Polymers (Basel) Article This study experimentally investigated the axial crushing characteristics of the hybrid tubes with the configuration of aluminum/carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) (1/1) and aluminum/CFRP/aluminum (2/1). The effects of geometry size and fiber lay-up sequence on the axial crushing energy-absorption performances and failure modes of the two types of hybrid tubes were compared. The results showed that the energy absorption of the specimens with [0°/90°] lay-up sequence was better than that of the ones with [45°/−45°] lay-up sequence for both types of hybrid tubes. The proper length of the tubes should be selected to avoid too small a length-to-diameter ratio so that a stable and controllable progressive crushing failure mode can be achieved. When the crushing failure process was relatively stable, the specific energy absorption and crushing force efficiency of the 2/1 hybrid tubes were not affected by the geometric size. The energy absorption of the hybrid tubes was higher than the sum of the energy absorption of all the corresponding individual tubes, showing a positive hybrid effect. MDPI 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9571110/ /pubmed/36235982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14194034 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ge, Fei
Lin, Yuan
Zhang, Fukai
Zhang, Zhongwei
Wang, Mingyang
Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes
title Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes
title_full Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes
title_fullStr Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes
title_full_unstemmed Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes
title_short Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes
title_sort crushing characteristics comparison between aluminum/cfrp and aluminum/cfrp/aluminum hybrid tubes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235982
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14194034
work_keys_str_mv AT gefei crushingcharacteristicscomparisonbetweenaluminumcfrpandaluminumcfrpaluminumhybridtubes
AT linyuan crushingcharacteristicscomparisonbetweenaluminumcfrpandaluminumcfrpaluminumhybridtubes
AT zhangfukai crushingcharacteristicscomparisonbetweenaluminumcfrpandaluminumcfrpaluminumhybridtubes
AT zhangzhongwei crushingcharacteristicscomparisonbetweenaluminumcfrpandaluminumcfrpaluminumhybridtubes
AT wangmingyang crushingcharacteristicscomparisonbetweenaluminumcfrpandaluminumcfrpaluminumhybridtubes