Cargando…
Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes
This study experimentally investigated the axial crushing characteristics of the hybrid tubes with the configuration of aluminum/carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) (1/1) and aluminum/CFRP/aluminum (2/1). The effects of geometry size and fiber lay-up sequence on the axial crushing energy-absorpti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14194034 |
_version_ | 1784810280337801216 |
---|---|
author | Ge, Fei Lin, Yuan Zhang, Fukai Zhang, Zhongwei Wang, Mingyang |
author_facet | Ge, Fei Lin, Yuan Zhang, Fukai Zhang, Zhongwei Wang, Mingyang |
author_sort | Ge, Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study experimentally investigated the axial crushing characteristics of the hybrid tubes with the configuration of aluminum/carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) (1/1) and aluminum/CFRP/aluminum (2/1). The effects of geometry size and fiber lay-up sequence on the axial crushing energy-absorption performances and failure modes of the two types of hybrid tubes were compared. The results showed that the energy absorption of the specimens with [0°/90°] lay-up sequence was better than that of the ones with [45°/−45°] lay-up sequence for both types of hybrid tubes. The proper length of the tubes should be selected to avoid too small a length-to-diameter ratio so that a stable and controllable progressive crushing failure mode can be achieved. When the crushing failure process was relatively stable, the specific energy absorption and crushing force efficiency of the 2/1 hybrid tubes were not affected by the geometric size. The energy absorption of the hybrid tubes was higher than the sum of the energy absorption of all the corresponding individual tubes, showing a positive hybrid effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9571110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95711102022-10-17 Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes Ge, Fei Lin, Yuan Zhang, Fukai Zhang, Zhongwei Wang, Mingyang Polymers (Basel) Article This study experimentally investigated the axial crushing characteristics of the hybrid tubes with the configuration of aluminum/carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) (1/1) and aluminum/CFRP/aluminum (2/1). The effects of geometry size and fiber lay-up sequence on the axial crushing energy-absorption performances and failure modes of the two types of hybrid tubes were compared. The results showed that the energy absorption of the specimens with [0°/90°] lay-up sequence was better than that of the ones with [45°/−45°] lay-up sequence for both types of hybrid tubes. The proper length of the tubes should be selected to avoid too small a length-to-diameter ratio so that a stable and controllable progressive crushing failure mode can be achieved. When the crushing failure process was relatively stable, the specific energy absorption and crushing force efficiency of the 2/1 hybrid tubes were not affected by the geometric size. The energy absorption of the hybrid tubes was higher than the sum of the energy absorption of all the corresponding individual tubes, showing a positive hybrid effect. MDPI 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9571110/ /pubmed/36235982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14194034 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ge, Fei Lin, Yuan Zhang, Fukai Zhang, Zhongwei Wang, Mingyang Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes |
title | Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes |
title_full | Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes |
title_fullStr | Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes |
title_full_unstemmed | Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes |
title_short | Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes |
title_sort | crushing characteristics comparison between aluminum/cfrp and aluminum/cfrp/aluminum hybrid tubes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14194034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gefei crushingcharacteristicscomparisonbetweenaluminumcfrpandaluminumcfrpaluminumhybridtubes AT linyuan crushingcharacteristicscomparisonbetweenaluminumcfrpandaluminumcfrpaluminumhybridtubes AT zhangfukai crushingcharacteristicscomparisonbetweenaluminumcfrpandaluminumcfrpaluminumhybridtubes AT zhangzhongwei crushingcharacteristicscomparisonbetweenaluminumcfrpandaluminumcfrpaluminumhybridtubes AT wangmingyang crushingcharacteristicscomparisonbetweenaluminumcfrpandaluminumcfrpaluminumhybridtubes |