Cargando…
Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems
Plants are key components of the terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle. Atmospheric CO(2) is assimilated through photosynthesis and stored in plant biomass and in the soil. The use of turfgrass is expanding due to the increasing human population and urbanization. In this review, we summarize recent car...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11192478 |
_version_ | 1784810312502870016 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Ruying Mattox, Clint M. Phillips, Claire L. Kowalewski, Alec R. |
author_facet | Wang, Ruying Mattox, Clint M. Phillips, Claire L. Kowalewski, Alec R. |
author_sort | Wang, Ruying |
collection | PubMed |
description | Plants are key components of the terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle. Atmospheric CO(2) is assimilated through photosynthesis and stored in plant biomass and in the soil. The use of turfgrass is expanding due to the increasing human population and urbanization. In this review, we summarize recent carbon sequestration research in turfgrass and compare turfgrass systems to other plant systems. The soil organic carbon (SOC) stored in turfgrass systems is comparable to that in other natural and agricultural systems. Turfgrass systems are generally carbon-neutral or carbon sinks, with the exception of intensively managed areas, such as golf course greens and athletic fields. Turfgrass used in other areas, such as golf course fairways and roughs, parks, and home lawns, has the potential to contribute to carbon sequestration if proper management practices are implemented. High management inputs can increase the biomass productivity of turfgrass but do not guarantee higher SOC compared to low management inputs. Additionally, choosing the appropriate turfgrass species that are well adapted to the local climate and tolerant to stresses can maximize CO(2) assimilation and biomass productivity, although other factors, such as soil respiration, can considerably affect SOC. Future research is needed to document the complete carbon footprint, as well as to identify best management practices and appropriate turfgrass species to enhance carbon sequestration in turfgrass systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9571228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95712282022-10-17 Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems Wang, Ruying Mattox, Clint M. Phillips, Claire L. Kowalewski, Alec R. Plants (Basel) Review Plants are key components of the terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle. Atmospheric CO(2) is assimilated through photosynthesis and stored in plant biomass and in the soil. The use of turfgrass is expanding due to the increasing human population and urbanization. In this review, we summarize recent carbon sequestration research in turfgrass and compare turfgrass systems to other plant systems. The soil organic carbon (SOC) stored in turfgrass systems is comparable to that in other natural and agricultural systems. Turfgrass systems are generally carbon-neutral or carbon sinks, with the exception of intensively managed areas, such as golf course greens and athletic fields. Turfgrass used in other areas, such as golf course fairways and roughs, parks, and home lawns, has the potential to contribute to carbon sequestration if proper management practices are implemented. High management inputs can increase the biomass productivity of turfgrass but do not guarantee higher SOC compared to low management inputs. Additionally, choosing the appropriate turfgrass species that are well adapted to the local climate and tolerant to stresses can maximize CO(2) assimilation and biomass productivity, although other factors, such as soil respiration, can considerably affect SOC. Future research is needed to document the complete carbon footprint, as well as to identify best management practices and appropriate turfgrass species to enhance carbon sequestration in turfgrass systems. MDPI 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9571228/ /pubmed/36235344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11192478 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Wang, Ruying Mattox, Clint M. Phillips, Claire L. Kowalewski, Alec R. Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems |
title | Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems |
title_full | Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems |
title_fullStr | Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems |
title_short | Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems |
title_sort | carbon sequestration in turfgrass–soil systems |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11192478 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangruying carbonsequestrationinturfgrasssoilsystems AT mattoxclintm carbonsequestrationinturfgrasssoilsystems AT phillipsclairel carbonsequestrationinturfgrasssoilsystems AT kowalewskialecr carbonsequestrationinturfgrasssoilsystems |