Cargando…

Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems

Plants are key components of the terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle. Atmospheric CO(2) is assimilated through photosynthesis and stored in plant biomass and in the soil. The use of turfgrass is expanding due to the increasing human population and urbanization. In this review, we summarize recent car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ruying, Mattox, Clint M., Phillips, Claire L., Kowalewski, Alec R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11192478
_version_ 1784810312502870016
author Wang, Ruying
Mattox, Clint M.
Phillips, Claire L.
Kowalewski, Alec R.
author_facet Wang, Ruying
Mattox, Clint M.
Phillips, Claire L.
Kowalewski, Alec R.
author_sort Wang, Ruying
collection PubMed
description Plants are key components of the terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle. Atmospheric CO(2) is assimilated through photosynthesis and stored in plant biomass and in the soil. The use of turfgrass is expanding due to the increasing human population and urbanization. In this review, we summarize recent carbon sequestration research in turfgrass and compare turfgrass systems to other plant systems. The soil organic carbon (SOC) stored in turfgrass systems is comparable to that in other natural and agricultural systems. Turfgrass systems are generally carbon-neutral or carbon sinks, with the exception of intensively managed areas, such as golf course greens and athletic fields. Turfgrass used in other areas, such as golf course fairways and roughs, parks, and home lawns, has the potential to contribute to carbon sequestration if proper management practices are implemented. High management inputs can increase the biomass productivity of turfgrass but do not guarantee higher SOC compared to low management inputs. Additionally, choosing the appropriate turfgrass species that are well adapted to the local climate and tolerant to stresses can maximize CO(2) assimilation and biomass productivity, although other factors, such as soil respiration, can considerably affect SOC. Future research is needed to document the complete carbon footprint, as well as to identify best management practices and appropriate turfgrass species to enhance carbon sequestration in turfgrass systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9571228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95712282022-10-17 Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems Wang, Ruying Mattox, Clint M. Phillips, Claire L. Kowalewski, Alec R. Plants (Basel) Review Plants are key components of the terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle. Atmospheric CO(2) is assimilated through photosynthesis and stored in plant biomass and in the soil. The use of turfgrass is expanding due to the increasing human population and urbanization. In this review, we summarize recent carbon sequestration research in turfgrass and compare turfgrass systems to other plant systems. The soil organic carbon (SOC) stored in turfgrass systems is comparable to that in other natural and agricultural systems. Turfgrass systems are generally carbon-neutral or carbon sinks, with the exception of intensively managed areas, such as golf course greens and athletic fields. Turfgrass used in other areas, such as golf course fairways and roughs, parks, and home lawns, has the potential to contribute to carbon sequestration if proper management practices are implemented. High management inputs can increase the biomass productivity of turfgrass but do not guarantee higher SOC compared to low management inputs. Additionally, choosing the appropriate turfgrass species that are well adapted to the local climate and tolerant to stresses can maximize CO(2) assimilation and biomass productivity, although other factors, such as soil respiration, can considerably affect SOC. Future research is needed to document the complete carbon footprint, as well as to identify best management practices and appropriate turfgrass species to enhance carbon sequestration in turfgrass systems. MDPI 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9571228/ /pubmed/36235344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11192478 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Wang, Ruying
Mattox, Clint M.
Phillips, Claire L.
Kowalewski, Alec R.
Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems
title Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems
title_full Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems
title_fullStr Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems
title_full_unstemmed Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems
title_short Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass–Soil Systems
title_sort carbon sequestration in turfgrass–soil systems
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11192478
work_keys_str_mv AT wangruying carbonsequestrationinturfgrasssoilsystems
AT mattoxclintm carbonsequestrationinturfgrasssoilsystems
AT phillipsclairel carbonsequestrationinturfgrasssoilsystems
AT kowalewskialecr carbonsequestrationinturfgrasssoilsystems