Cargando…

Image-Based Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation for Shape-Memory Polymer Polyurethane Foam

Shape-memory polymer (SMP) polyurethane foams have been applied as embolic devices and implanted in multiple animal models. These materials are oxidatively degradable and it is critical to quantify and characterize the degradation for biocompatibility assessments. An image-based method using high-re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graul, Lance M., Horn, Staci J., Nash, Landon D., Cheung, Thomas B., Clubb, Fred J., Maitland, Duncan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236069
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14194122
_version_ 1784810348696567808
author Graul, Lance M.
Horn, Staci J.
Nash, Landon D.
Cheung, Thomas B.
Clubb, Fred J.
Maitland, Duncan J.
author_facet Graul, Lance M.
Horn, Staci J.
Nash, Landon D.
Cheung, Thomas B.
Clubb, Fred J.
Maitland, Duncan J.
author_sort Graul, Lance M.
collection PubMed
description Shape-memory polymer (SMP) polyurethane foams have been applied as embolic devices and implanted in multiple animal models. These materials are oxidatively degradable and it is critical to quantify and characterize the degradation for biocompatibility assessments. An image-based method using high-resolution and magnification scans of histology sections was used to estimate the mass loss of the peripheral and neurovascular embolization devices (PED, NED). Detailed analysis of foam microarchitecture (i.e., struts and membranes) was used to estimate total relative mass loss over time. PED foams implanted in porcine arteries showed a degradation rate of ~0.11% per day as evaluated at 30-, 60-, and 90-day explant timepoints. NED foams implanted in rabbit carotid elastase aneurysms showed a markedly faster rate of degradation at ~1.01% per day, with a clear difference in overall degradation between 30- and 90-day explants. Overall, membranes degraded faster than the struts. NEDs use more hydrophobic foam with a smaller pore size (~150–400 μm) compared to PED foams (~800–1200 μm). Previous in vitro studies indicated differences in the degradation of the two polymer systems, but not to the magnitude seen in vivo. Implant location, animal species, and local tissue health are among the hypothesized reasons for different degradation rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9571375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95713752022-10-17 Image-Based Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation for Shape-Memory Polymer Polyurethane Foam Graul, Lance M. Horn, Staci J. Nash, Landon D. Cheung, Thomas B. Clubb, Fred J. Maitland, Duncan J. Polymers (Basel) Article Shape-memory polymer (SMP) polyurethane foams have been applied as embolic devices and implanted in multiple animal models. These materials are oxidatively degradable and it is critical to quantify and characterize the degradation for biocompatibility assessments. An image-based method using high-resolution and magnification scans of histology sections was used to estimate the mass loss of the peripheral and neurovascular embolization devices (PED, NED). Detailed analysis of foam microarchitecture (i.e., struts and membranes) was used to estimate total relative mass loss over time. PED foams implanted in porcine arteries showed a degradation rate of ~0.11% per day as evaluated at 30-, 60-, and 90-day explant timepoints. NED foams implanted in rabbit carotid elastase aneurysms showed a markedly faster rate of degradation at ~1.01% per day, with a clear difference in overall degradation between 30- and 90-day explants. Overall, membranes degraded faster than the struts. NEDs use more hydrophobic foam with a smaller pore size (~150–400 μm) compared to PED foams (~800–1200 μm). Previous in vitro studies indicated differences in the degradation of the two polymer systems, but not to the magnitude seen in vivo. Implant location, animal species, and local tissue health are among the hypothesized reasons for different degradation rates. MDPI 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9571375/ /pubmed/36236069 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14194122 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Graul, Lance M.
Horn, Staci J.
Nash, Landon D.
Cheung, Thomas B.
Clubb, Fred J.
Maitland, Duncan J.
Image-Based Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation for Shape-Memory Polymer Polyurethane Foam
title Image-Based Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation for Shape-Memory Polymer Polyurethane Foam
title_full Image-Based Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation for Shape-Memory Polymer Polyurethane Foam
title_fullStr Image-Based Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation for Shape-Memory Polymer Polyurethane Foam
title_full_unstemmed Image-Based Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation for Shape-Memory Polymer Polyurethane Foam
title_short Image-Based Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation for Shape-Memory Polymer Polyurethane Foam
title_sort image-based evaluation of in vivo degradation for shape-memory polymer polyurethane foam
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236069
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14194122
work_keys_str_mv AT graullancem imagebasedevaluationofinvivodegradationforshapememorypolymerpolyurethanefoam
AT hornstacij imagebasedevaluationofinvivodegradationforshapememorypolymerpolyurethanefoam
AT nashlandond imagebasedevaluationofinvivodegradationforshapememorypolymerpolyurethanefoam
AT cheungthomasb imagebasedevaluationofinvivodegradationforshapememorypolymerpolyurethanefoam
AT clubbfredj imagebasedevaluationofinvivodegradationforshapememorypolymerpolyurethanefoam
AT maitlandduncanj imagebasedevaluationofinvivodegradationforshapememorypolymerpolyurethanefoam