Cargando…
What GPs do to meet accreditation standards – implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation
BACKGROUND: Healthcare accreditation is a widely implemented tool used to enhance the quality of care and underpin quality control. However, research is sparse on the accreditation process in general practice. The aim of this study was to explore how team-based implementation activities preceding ac...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36243686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01864-y |
_version_ | 1784810372798087168 |
---|---|
author | Mølgaard, Cecilie Bro, Flemming Mygind, Anna |
author_facet | Mølgaard, Cecilie Bro, Flemming Mygind, Anna |
author_sort | Mølgaard, Cecilie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthcare accreditation is a widely implemented tool used to enhance the quality of care and underpin quality control. However, research is sparse on the accreditation process in general practice. The aim of this study was to explore how team-based implementation activities preceding accreditation were associated with self-perceived improvements in emergency preparedness (preparedness for urgent disease and cardiac arrest) and handling of prescription renewals in Danish general practice. METHODS: GPs (general practitioners) completed a questionnaire exploring practice-team activities conducted to implement two specific accreditation standards and the related improvements as perceived by the GPs. The following implementation activities were selected, inspired by Normalization Process Theory: Common understanding (obtaining a common understanding of the purpose of implementing changes according to the accreditation standard), key person (assigning a key person responsible for working with the standard), and easy integration (finding it easy to integrate changes into existing working procedures). Data were analysed with logistic regression, and adjusted analyses included practice type, number of GP partners, number of staff, training site for junior GPs and administrative region. RESULTS: The total response rate was 74% (n = 920). Around 80% of the clinics reported having conducted team-based implementation activities. Almost half of the clinics (48%) reported perceived improvements in the emergency preparedness, and 30% reported perceived improvements in the handling of prescription renewals. Obtaining a common understanding was found to have a strong, significant association with perceived improvements in the emergency preparedness (OR = 5.07 (3.06–8.40)) and handling of prescription renewals (OR = 3.66 (2.07–6.46)). Easy integration of changes was also significantly associated with improvements in both emergency preparedness (OR = 1.88 (1.24–2.85)) and handling of prescription renewals (OR = 2.34 (1.44–3.79)), whereas assigning a key person was only significantly associated with improved emergency preparedness (OR = 1.95 (1.19–3.19)). CONCLUSION: Clinical quality initiatives that involve collaboration within a practice team are more likely to cause improvements if specific team-based implementation activities are conducted. It is particularly important to facilitate a common understanding of the purpose of the initiative. Therefore, external support for quality initiatives aiming at the practice level in general practice should facilitate such team-based activities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01864-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9571477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95714772022-10-17 What GPs do to meet accreditation standards – implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation Mølgaard, Cecilie Bro, Flemming Mygind, Anna BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Healthcare accreditation is a widely implemented tool used to enhance the quality of care and underpin quality control. However, research is sparse on the accreditation process in general practice. The aim of this study was to explore how team-based implementation activities preceding accreditation were associated with self-perceived improvements in emergency preparedness (preparedness for urgent disease and cardiac arrest) and handling of prescription renewals in Danish general practice. METHODS: GPs (general practitioners) completed a questionnaire exploring practice-team activities conducted to implement two specific accreditation standards and the related improvements as perceived by the GPs. The following implementation activities were selected, inspired by Normalization Process Theory: Common understanding (obtaining a common understanding of the purpose of implementing changes according to the accreditation standard), key person (assigning a key person responsible for working with the standard), and easy integration (finding it easy to integrate changes into existing working procedures). Data were analysed with logistic regression, and adjusted analyses included practice type, number of GP partners, number of staff, training site for junior GPs and administrative region. RESULTS: The total response rate was 74% (n = 920). Around 80% of the clinics reported having conducted team-based implementation activities. Almost half of the clinics (48%) reported perceived improvements in the emergency preparedness, and 30% reported perceived improvements in the handling of prescription renewals. Obtaining a common understanding was found to have a strong, significant association with perceived improvements in the emergency preparedness (OR = 5.07 (3.06–8.40)) and handling of prescription renewals (OR = 3.66 (2.07–6.46)). Easy integration of changes was also significantly associated with improvements in both emergency preparedness (OR = 1.88 (1.24–2.85)) and handling of prescription renewals (OR = 2.34 (1.44–3.79)), whereas assigning a key person was only significantly associated with improved emergency preparedness (OR = 1.95 (1.19–3.19)). CONCLUSION: Clinical quality initiatives that involve collaboration within a practice team are more likely to cause improvements if specific team-based implementation activities are conducted. It is particularly important to facilitate a common understanding of the purpose of the initiative. Therefore, external support for quality initiatives aiming at the practice level in general practice should facilitate such team-based activities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01864-y. BioMed Central 2022-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9571477/ /pubmed/36243686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01864-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mølgaard, Cecilie Bro, Flemming Mygind, Anna What GPs do to meet accreditation standards – implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation |
title | What GPs do to meet accreditation standards – implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation |
title_full | What GPs do to meet accreditation standards – implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation |
title_fullStr | What GPs do to meet accreditation standards – implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation |
title_full_unstemmed | What GPs do to meet accreditation standards – implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation |
title_short | What GPs do to meet accreditation standards – implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation |
title_sort | what gps do to meet accreditation standards – implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36243686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01864-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mølgaardcecilie whatgpsdotomeetaccreditationstandardsimplementationactivitiesandperceivedimprovementsattributedtogeneralpracticeaccreditation AT broflemming whatgpsdotomeetaccreditationstandardsimplementationactivitiesandperceivedimprovementsattributedtogeneralpracticeaccreditation AT mygindanna whatgpsdotomeetaccreditationstandardsimplementationactivitiesandperceivedimprovementsattributedtogeneralpracticeaccreditation |