Cargando…
Enhanced Ambient Sensing Environment—A New Method for Calibrating Low-Cost Gas Sensors
Accurate calibration of low-cost gas sensors is, at present, a time consuming and difficult process. Laboratory calibration and field calibration methods are currently used, but laboratory calibration is generally discounted due to poor transferability, and field methods requiring several weeks are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236337 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197238 |
_version_ | 1784810484602503168 |
---|---|
author | Russell, Hugo Savill Frederickson, Louise Bøge Kwiatkowski, Szymon Emygdio, Ana Paula Mendes Kumar, Prashant Schmidt, Johan Albrecht Hertel, Ole Johnson, Matthew Stanley |
author_facet | Russell, Hugo Savill Frederickson, Louise Bøge Kwiatkowski, Szymon Emygdio, Ana Paula Mendes Kumar, Prashant Schmidt, Johan Albrecht Hertel, Ole Johnson, Matthew Stanley |
author_sort | Russell, Hugo Savill |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate calibration of low-cost gas sensors is, at present, a time consuming and difficult process. Laboratory calibration and field calibration methods are currently used, but laboratory calibration is generally discounted due to poor transferability, and field methods requiring several weeks are standard. The Enhanced Ambient Sensing Environment (EASE) method described in this article, is a hybrid of the two, combining the advantages of a laboratory calibration with the increased accuracy of a field calibration. It involves calibrating sensors inside a duct, drawing in ambient air with similar properties to the site where the sensors will operate, but with the added feature of being able to artificially increases or decrease pollutant levels, thus condensing the calibration period required. Calibration of both metal-oxide (MOx) and electrochemical (EC) gas sensors for the measurement of NO(2) and O(3) (0–120 ppb) were conducted in EASE, laboratory and field environments, and validated in field environments. The EC sensors performed marginally better than MOx sensors for NO(2) measurement and sensor performance was similar for O(3) measurement, but the EC sensor nodes had less node inter-node variability and were more robust. For both gasses and sensor types the EASE calibration outperformed the laboratory calibration, and performed similarly to or better than the field calibration, whilst requiring a fraction of the time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9571921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95719212022-10-17 Enhanced Ambient Sensing Environment—A New Method for Calibrating Low-Cost Gas Sensors Russell, Hugo Savill Frederickson, Louise Bøge Kwiatkowski, Szymon Emygdio, Ana Paula Mendes Kumar, Prashant Schmidt, Johan Albrecht Hertel, Ole Johnson, Matthew Stanley Sensors (Basel) Article Accurate calibration of low-cost gas sensors is, at present, a time consuming and difficult process. Laboratory calibration and field calibration methods are currently used, but laboratory calibration is generally discounted due to poor transferability, and field methods requiring several weeks are standard. The Enhanced Ambient Sensing Environment (EASE) method described in this article, is a hybrid of the two, combining the advantages of a laboratory calibration with the increased accuracy of a field calibration. It involves calibrating sensors inside a duct, drawing in ambient air with similar properties to the site where the sensors will operate, but with the added feature of being able to artificially increases or decrease pollutant levels, thus condensing the calibration period required. Calibration of both metal-oxide (MOx) and electrochemical (EC) gas sensors for the measurement of NO(2) and O(3) (0–120 ppb) were conducted in EASE, laboratory and field environments, and validated in field environments. The EC sensors performed marginally better than MOx sensors for NO(2) measurement and sensor performance was similar for O(3) measurement, but the EC sensor nodes had less node inter-node variability and were more robust. For both gasses and sensor types the EASE calibration outperformed the laboratory calibration, and performed similarly to or better than the field calibration, whilst requiring a fraction of the time. MDPI 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9571921/ /pubmed/36236337 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197238 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Russell, Hugo Savill Frederickson, Louise Bøge Kwiatkowski, Szymon Emygdio, Ana Paula Mendes Kumar, Prashant Schmidt, Johan Albrecht Hertel, Ole Johnson, Matthew Stanley Enhanced Ambient Sensing Environment—A New Method for Calibrating Low-Cost Gas Sensors |
title | Enhanced Ambient Sensing Environment—A New Method for Calibrating Low-Cost Gas Sensors |
title_full | Enhanced Ambient Sensing Environment—A New Method for Calibrating Low-Cost Gas Sensors |
title_fullStr | Enhanced Ambient Sensing Environment—A New Method for Calibrating Low-Cost Gas Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhanced Ambient Sensing Environment—A New Method for Calibrating Low-Cost Gas Sensors |
title_short | Enhanced Ambient Sensing Environment—A New Method for Calibrating Low-Cost Gas Sensors |
title_sort | enhanced ambient sensing environment—a new method for calibrating low-cost gas sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9571921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236337 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT russellhugosavill enhancedambientsensingenvironmentanewmethodforcalibratinglowcostgassensors AT fredericksonlouisebøge enhancedambientsensingenvironmentanewmethodforcalibratinglowcostgassensors AT kwiatkowskiszymon enhancedambientsensingenvironmentanewmethodforcalibratinglowcostgassensors AT emygdioanapaulamendes enhancedambientsensingenvironmentanewmethodforcalibratinglowcostgassensors AT kumarprashant enhancedambientsensingenvironmentanewmethodforcalibratinglowcostgassensors AT schmidtjohanalbrecht enhancedambientsensingenvironmentanewmethodforcalibratinglowcostgassensors AT hertelole enhancedambientsensingenvironmentanewmethodforcalibratinglowcostgassensors AT johnsonmatthewstanley enhancedambientsensingenvironmentanewmethodforcalibratinglowcostgassensors |