Cargando…

Impact of Label Noise on the Learning Based Models for a Binary Classification of Physiological Signal

Label noise is omnipresent in the annotations process and has an impact on supervised learning algorithms. This work focuses on the impact of label noise on the performance of learning models by examining the effect of random and class-dependent label noise on a binary classification task: quality a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Cheng, Pereira, Tania, Xiao, Ran, Lee, Randall J., Hu, Xiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236265
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197166
_version_ 1784810530540617728
author Ding, Cheng
Pereira, Tania
Xiao, Ran
Lee, Randall J.
Hu, Xiao
author_facet Ding, Cheng
Pereira, Tania
Xiao, Ran
Lee, Randall J.
Hu, Xiao
author_sort Ding, Cheng
collection PubMed
description Label noise is omnipresent in the annotations process and has an impact on supervised learning algorithms. This work focuses on the impact of label noise on the performance of learning models by examining the effect of random and class-dependent label noise on a binary classification task: quality assessment for photoplethysmography (PPG). PPG signal is used to detect physiological changes and its quality can have a significant impact on the subsequent tasks, which makes PPG quality assessment a particularly good target for examining the impact of label noise in the field of biomedicine. Random and class-dependent label noise was introduced separately into the training set to emulate the errors associated with fatigue and bias in labeling data samples. We also tested different representations of the PPG, including features defined by domain experts, 1D raw signal and 2D image. Three different classifiers are tested on the noisy training data, including support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost, 1D Resnet and 2D Resnet, which handle three representations, respectively. The results showed that the two deep learning models were more robust than the two traditional machine learning models for both the random and class-dependent label noise. From the representation perspective, the 2D image shows better robustness compared to the 1D raw signal. The logits from three classifiers are also analyzed, the predicted probabilities intend to be more dispersed when more label noise is introduced. From this work, we investigated various factors related to label noise, including representations, label noise type, and data imbalance, which can be a good guidebook for designing more robust methods for label noise in future work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9572105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95721052022-10-17 Impact of Label Noise on the Learning Based Models for a Binary Classification of Physiological Signal Ding, Cheng Pereira, Tania Xiao, Ran Lee, Randall J. Hu, Xiao Sensors (Basel) Article Label noise is omnipresent in the annotations process and has an impact on supervised learning algorithms. This work focuses on the impact of label noise on the performance of learning models by examining the effect of random and class-dependent label noise on a binary classification task: quality assessment for photoplethysmography (PPG). PPG signal is used to detect physiological changes and its quality can have a significant impact on the subsequent tasks, which makes PPG quality assessment a particularly good target for examining the impact of label noise in the field of biomedicine. Random and class-dependent label noise was introduced separately into the training set to emulate the errors associated with fatigue and bias in labeling data samples. We also tested different representations of the PPG, including features defined by domain experts, 1D raw signal and 2D image. Three different classifiers are tested on the noisy training data, including support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost, 1D Resnet and 2D Resnet, which handle three representations, respectively. The results showed that the two deep learning models were more robust than the two traditional machine learning models for both the random and class-dependent label noise. From the representation perspective, the 2D image shows better robustness compared to the 1D raw signal. The logits from three classifiers are also analyzed, the predicted probabilities intend to be more dispersed when more label noise is introduced. From this work, we investigated various factors related to label noise, including representations, label noise type, and data imbalance, which can be a good guidebook for designing more robust methods for label noise in future work. MDPI 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9572105/ /pubmed/36236265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197166 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ding, Cheng
Pereira, Tania
Xiao, Ran
Lee, Randall J.
Hu, Xiao
Impact of Label Noise on the Learning Based Models for a Binary Classification of Physiological Signal
title Impact of Label Noise on the Learning Based Models for a Binary Classification of Physiological Signal
title_full Impact of Label Noise on the Learning Based Models for a Binary Classification of Physiological Signal
title_fullStr Impact of Label Noise on the Learning Based Models for a Binary Classification of Physiological Signal
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Label Noise on the Learning Based Models for a Binary Classification of Physiological Signal
title_short Impact of Label Noise on the Learning Based Models for a Binary Classification of Physiological Signal
title_sort impact of label noise on the learning based models for a binary classification of physiological signal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236265
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197166
work_keys_str_mv AT dingcheng impactoflabelnoiseonthelearningbasedmodelsforabinaryclassificationofphysiologicalsignal
AT pereiratania impactoflabelnoiseonthelearningbasedmodelsforabinaryclassificationofphysiologicalsignal
AT xiaoran impactoflabelnoiseonthelearningbasedmodelsforabinaryclassificationofphysiologicalsignal
AT leerandallj impactoflabelnoiseonthelearningbasedmodelsforabinaryclassificationofphysiologicalsignal
AT huxiao impactoflabelnoiseonthelearningbasedmodelsforabinaryclassificationofphysiologicalsignal