Cargando…

Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding

Electrotactile stimulation is a technology that reproducibly elicits tactile sensations and can be used as an alternative channel to communicate information to the user. The presented work is a part of an effort to develop this technology into an unobtrusive communication tool for first responders....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malešević, Jovana, Kostić, Miloš, Jure, Fabricio A., Spaich, Erika G., Došen, Strahinja, Ilić, Vojin, Bijelić, Goran, Štrbac, Matija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197658
_version_ 1784810559436226560
author Malešević, Jovana
Kostić, Miloš
Jure, Fabricio A.
Spaich, Erika G.
Došen, Strahinja
Ilić, Vojin
Bijelić, Goran
Štrbac, Matija
author_facet Malešević, Jovana
Kostić, Miloš
Jure, Fabricio A.
Spaich, Erika G.
Došen, Strahinja
Ilić, Vojin
Bijelić, Goran
Štrbac, Matija
author_sort Malešević, Jovana
collection PubMed
description Electrotactile stimulation is a technology that reproducibly elicits tactile sensations and can be used as an alternative channel to communicate information to the user. The presented work is a part of an effort to develop this technology into an unobtrusive communication tool for first responders. In this study, the aim was to compare the success rate (SR) between discriminating stimulation at six spatial locations (static encoding) and recognizing six spatio-temporal patterns where pads are activated sequentially in a predetermined order (dynamic encoding). Additionally, a procedure for a fast amplitude calibration, that includes a semi-automated initialization and an optional manual adjustment, was employed and evaluated. Twenty subjects, including twelve first responders, participated in the study. The electrode comprising the 3 × 2 matrix of pads was placed on the lateral torso. The results showed that high SRs could be achieved for both types of message encoding after a short learning phase; however, the dynamic approach led to a statistically significant improvement in messages recognition (SR of 93.3%), compared to static stimulation (SR of 83.3%). The proposed calibration procedure was also effective since in 83.8% of the cases the subjects did not need to adjust the stimulation amplitude manually.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9572222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95722222022-10-17 Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding Malešević, Jovana Kostić, Miloš Jure, Fabricio A. Spaich, Erika G. Došen, Strahinja Ilić, Vojin Bijelić, Goran Štrbac, Matija Sensors (Basel) Article Electrotactile stimulation is a technology that reproducibly elicits tactile sensations and can be used as an alternative channel to communicate information to the user. The presented work is a part of an effort to develop this technology into an unobtrusive communication tool for first responders. In this study, the aim was to compare the success rate (SR) between discriminating stimulation at six spatial locations (static encoding) and recognizing six spatio-temporal patterns where pads are activated sequentially in a predetermined order (dynamic encoding). Additionally, a procedure for a fast amplitude calibration, that includes a semi-automated initialization and an optional manual adjustment, was employed and evaluated. Twenty subjects, including twelve first responders, participated in the study. The electrode comprising the 3 × 2 matrix of pads was placed on the lateral torso. The results showed that high SRs could be achieved for both types of message encoding after a short learning phase; however, the dynamic approach led to a statistically significant improvement in messages recognition (SR of 93.3%), compared to static stimulation (SR of 83.3%). The proposed calibration procedure was also effective since in 83.8% of the cases the subjects did not need to adjust the stimulation amplitude manually. MDPI 2022-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9572222/ /pubmed/36236758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197658 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Malešević, Jovana
Kostić, Miloš
Jure, Fabricio A.
Spaich, Erika G.
Došen, Strahinja
Ilić, Vojin
Bijelić, Goran
Štrbac, Matija
Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding
title Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding
title_full Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding
title_fullStr Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding
title_full_unstemmed Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding
title_short Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding
title_sort electrotactile communication via matrix electrode placed on the torso using fast calibration, and static vs. dynamic encoding
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197658
work_keys_str_mv AT malesevicjovana electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding
AT kosticmilos electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding
AT jurefabricioa electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding
AT spaicherikag electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding
AT dosenstrahinja electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding
AT ilicvojin electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding
AT bijelicgoran electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding
AT strbacmatija electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding