Cargando…
Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding
Electrotactile stimulation is a technology that reproducibly elicits tactile sensations and can be used as an alternative channel to communicate information to the user. The presented work is a part of an effort to develop this technology into an unobtrusive communication tool for first responders....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197658 |
_version_ | 1784810559436226560 |
---|---|
author | Malešević, Jovana Kostić, Miloš Jure, Fabricio A. Spaich, Erika G. Došen, Strahinja Ilić, Vojin Bijelić, Goran Štrbac, Matija |
author_facet | Malešević, Jovana Kostić, Miloš Jure, Fabricio A. Spaich, Erika G. Došen, Strahinja Ilić, Vojin Bijelić, Goran Štrbac, Matija |
author_sort | Malešević, Jovana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electrotactile stimulation is a technology that reproducibly elicits tactile sensations and can be used as an alternative channel to communicate information to the user. The presented work is a part of an effort to develop this technology into an unobtrusive communication tool for first responders. In this study, the aim was to compare the success rate (SR) between discriminating stimulation at six spatial locations (static encoding) and recognizing six spatio-temporal patterns where pads are activated sequentially in a predetermined order (dynamic encoding). Additionally, a procedure for a fast amplitude calibration, that includes a semi-automated initialization and an optional manual adjustment, was employed and evaluated. Twenty subjects, including twelve first responders, participated in the study. The electrode comprising the 3 × 2 matrix of pads was placed on the lateral torso. The results showed that high SRs could be achieved for both types of message encoding after a short learning phase; however, the dynamic approach led to a statistically significant improvement in messages recognition (SR of 93.3%), compared to static stimulation (SR of 83.3%). The proposed calibration procedure was also effective since in 83.8% of the cases the subjects did not need to adjust the stimulation amplitude manually. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9572222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95722222022-10-17 Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding Malešević, Jovana Kostić, Miloš Jure, Fabricio A. Spaich, Erika G. Došen, Strahinja Ilić, Vojin Bijelić, Goran Štrbac, Matija Sensors (Basel) Article Electrotactile stimulation is a technology that reproducibly elicits tactile sensations and can be used as an alternative channel to communicate information to the user. The presented work is a part of an effort to develop this technology into an unobtrusive communication tool for first responders. In this study, the aim was to compare the success rate (SR) between discriminating stimulation at six spatial locations (static encoding) and recognizing six spatio-temporal patterns where pads are activated sequentially in a predetermined order (dynamic encoding). Additionally, a procedure for a fast amplitude calibration, that includes a semi-automated initialization and an optional manual adjustment, was employed and evaluated. Twenty subjects, including twelve first responders, participated in the study. The electrode comprising the 3 × 2 matrix of pads was placed on the lateral torso. The results showed that high SRs could be achieved for both types of message encoding after a short learning phase; however, the dynamic approach led to a statistically significant improvement in messages recognition (SR of 93.3%), compared to static stimulation (SR of 83.3%). The proposed calibration procedure was also effective since in 83.8% of the cases the subjects did not need to adjust the stimulation amplitude manually. MDPI 2022-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9572222/ /pubmed/36236758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197658 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Malešević, Jovana Kostić, Miloš Jure, Fabricio A. Spaich, Erika G. Došen, Strahinja Ilić, Vojin Bijelić, Goran Štrbac, Matija Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding |
title | Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding |
title_full | Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding |
title_fullStr | Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding |
title_short | Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding |
title_sort | electrotactile communication via matrix electrode placed on the torso using fast calibration, and static vs. dynamic encoding |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197658 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malesevicjovana electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding AT kosticmilos electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding AT jurefabricioa electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding AT spaicherikag electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding AT dosenstrahinja electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding AT ilicvojin electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding AT bijelicgoran electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding AT strbacmatija electrotactilecommunicationviamatrixelectrodeplacedonthetorsousingfastcalibrationandstaticvsdynamicencoding |