Cargando…

EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study

Background: Massive osteolysis of the proximal femur makes stem revision a challenging procedure. EBRA-FCA provides the opportunity to determine stem migration, which is considered a predictive factor for implant survival. In this study, we aimed to analyze the migration behavior of a modular, dista...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blum, Philipp, Putzer, David, Neugebauer, Johannes, Neubauer, Markus, Süß, Markus, Dammerer, Dietmar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36233724
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195857
_version_ 1784810658801385472
author Blum, Philipp
Putzer, David
Neugebauer, Johannes
Neubauer, Markus
Süß, Markus
Dammerer, Dietmar
author_facet Blum, Philipp
Putzer, David
Neugebauer, Johannes
Neubauer, Markus
Süß, Markus
Dammerer, Dietmar
author_sort Blum, Philipp
collection PubMed
description Background: Massive osteolysis of the proximal femur makes stem revision a challenging procedure. EBRA-FCA provides the opportunity to determine stem migration, which is considered a predictive factor for implant survival. In this study, we aimed to analyze the migration behavior of a modular, distally fixed reconstruction prosthesis. Methods: Applying a retrospective study design, we reviewed all consecutive patients who received a cementless MP reconstruction prosthesis (Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany) at our Department between 2005 and 2019. We reviewed medical histories and performed radiological measurements using EBRA-FCA software. Results: A total of 67 stems in 62 patients (female 26; male 36) fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 68.0 (range 38.7–88.44) years. EBRA migration analysis showed a median subsidence of 1.6 mm (range 0.0–20.6) at 24 months. The angle between stem and femur axis was 0.3° (range 0.0°–2.9°) at final follow-up. No correlation between body mass index and increased subsidence was found (p > 0.05). Overall revision-free rate amounted to 92.5% and revision-free rate for aseptic loosening to 98.5%. Furthermore, no case of material breakage was detected. Conclusions: In summary, the MP reconstruction prosthesis showed low subsidence and reduction in the migration rate over the investigated follow-up. Based on this, the modular stem can be considered as a good therapy option in challenging stem revisions offering various options to address the individual anatomical situation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9572611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95726112022-10-17 EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study Blum, Philipp Putzer, David Neugebauer, Johannes Neubauer, Markus Süß, Markus Dammerer, Dietmar J Clin Med Article Background: Massive osteolysis of the proximal femur makes stem revision a challenging procedure. EBRA-FCA provides the opportunity to determine stem migration, which is considered a predictive factor for implant survival. In this study, we aimed to analyze the migration behavior of a modular, distally fixed reconstruction prosthesis. Methods: Applying a retrospective study design, we reviewed all consecutive patients who received a cementless MP reconstruction prosthesis (Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany) at our Department between 2005 and 2019. We reviewed medical histories and performed radiological measurements using EBRA-FCA software. Results: A total of 67 stems in 62 patients (female 26; male 36) fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 68.0 (range 38.7–88.44) years. EBRA migration analysis showed a median subsidence of 1.6 mm (range 0.0–20.6) at 24 months. The angle between stem and femur axis was 0.3° (range 0.0°–2.9°) at final follow-up. No correlation between body mass index and increased subsidence was found (p > 0.05). Overall revision-free rate amounted to 92.5% and revision-free rate for aseptic loosening to 98.5%. Furthermore, no case of material breakage was detected. Conclusions: In summary, the MP reconstruction prosthesis showed low subsidence and reduction in the migration rate over the investigated follow-up. Based on this, the modular stem can be considered as a good therapy option in challenging stem revisions offering various options to address the individual anatomical situation. MDPI 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9572611/ /pubmed/36233724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195857 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Blum, Philipp
Putzer, David
Neugebauer, Johannes
Neubauer, Markus
Süß, Markus
Dammerer, Dietmar
EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study
title EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study
title_full EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study
title_fullStr EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study
title_full_unstemmed EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study
title_short EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study
title_sort ebra migration analysis of a modular, distally fixed stem in hip revision arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36233724
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195857
work_keys_str_mv AT blumphilipp ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy
AT putzerdavid ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy
AT neugebauerjohannes ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy
AT neubauermarkus ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy
AT sußmarkus ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy
AT dammererdietmar ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy