Cargando…
EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study
Background: Massive osteolysis of the proximal femur makes stem revision a challenging procedure. EBRA-FCA provides the opportunity to determine stem migration, which is considered a predictive factor for implant survival. In this study, we aimed to analyze the migration behavior of a modular, dista...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36233724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195857 |
_version_ | 1784810658801385472 |
---|---|
author | Blum, Philipp Putzer, David Neugebauer, Johannes Neubauer, Markus Süß, Markus Dammerer, Dietmar |
author_facet | Blum, Philipp Putzer, David Neugebauer, Johannes Neubauer, Markus Süß, Markus Dammerer, Dietmar |
author_sort | Blum, Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Massive osteolysis of the proximal femur makes stem revision a challenging procedure. EBRA-FCA provides the opportunity to determine stem migration, which is considered a predictive factor for implant survival. In this study, we aimed to analyze the migration behavior of a modular, distally fixed reconstruction prosthesis. Methods: Applying a retrospective study design, we reviewed all consecutive patients who received a cementless MP reconstruction prosthesis (Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany) at our Department between 2005 and 2019. We reviewed medical histories and performed radiological measurements using EBRA-FCA software. Results: A total of 67 stems in 62 patients (female 26; male 36) fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 68.0 (range 38.7–88.44) years. EBRA migration analysis showed a median subsidence of 1.6 mm (range 0.0–20.6) at 24 months. The angle between stem and femur axis was 0.3° (range 0.0°–2.9°) at final follow-up. No correlation between body mass index and increased subsidence was found (p > 0.05). Overall revision-free rate amounted to 92.5% and revision-free rate for aseptic loosening to 98.5%. Furthermore, no case of material breakage was detected. Conclusions: In summary, the MP reconstruction prosthesis showed low subsidence and reduction in the migration rate over the investigated follow-up. Based on this, the modular stem can be considered as a good therapy option in challenging stem revisions offering various options to address the individual anatomical situation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9572611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95726112022-10-17 EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study Blum, Philipp Putzer, David Neugebauer, Johannes Neubauer, Markus Süß, Markus Dammerer, Dietmar J Clin Med Article Background: Massive osteolysis of the proximal femur makes stem revision a challenging procedure. EBRA-FCA provides the opportunity to determine stem migration, which is considered a predictive factor for implant survival. In this study, we aimed to analyze the migration behavior of a modular, distally fixed reconstruction prosthesis. Methods: Applying a retrospective study design, we reviewed all consecutive patients who received a cementless MP reconstruction prosthesis (Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany) at our Department between 2005 and 2019. We reviewed medical histories and performed radiological measurements using EBRA-FCA software. Results: A total of 67 stems in 62 patients (female 26; male 36) fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 68.0 (range 38.7–88.44) years. EBRA migration analysis showed a median subsidence of 1.6 mm (range 0.0–20.6) at 24 months. The angle between stem and femur axis was 0.3° (range 0.0°–2.9°) at final follow-up. No correlation between body mass index and increased subsidence was found (p > 0.05). Overall revision-free rate amounted to 92.5% and revision-free rate for aseptic loosening to 98.5%. Furthermore, no case of material breakage was detected. Conclusions: In summary, the MP reconstruction prosthesis showed low subsidence and reduction in the migration rate over the investigated follow-up. Based on this, the modular stem can be considered as a good therapy option in challenging stem revisions offering various options to address the individual anatomical situation. MDPI 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9572611/ /pubmed/36233724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195857 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Blum, Philipp Putzer, David Neugebauer, Johannes Neubauer, Markus Süß, Markus Dammerer, Dietmar EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study |
title | EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study |
title_full | EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study |
title_fullStr | EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study |
title_full_unstemmed | EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study |
title_short | EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study |
title_sort | ebra migration analysis of a modular, distally fixed stem in hip revision arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36233724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195857 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blumphilipp ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy AT putzerdavid ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy AT neugebauerjohannes ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy AT neubauermarkus ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy AT sußmarkus ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy AT dammererdietmar ebramigrationanalysisofamodulardistallyfixedsteminhiprevisionarthroplastyaclinicalandradiologicalstudy |