Cargando…
Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces
This work introduces a process to develop a tool-independent, high-fidelity, ray tracing-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR) model. This virtual LiDAR sensor includes accurate modeling of the scan pattern and a complete signal processing toolchain of a LiDAR sensor. It is developed as a functi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236655 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197556 |
_version_ | 1784810668026757120 |
---|---|
author | Haider, Arsalan Pigniczki, Marcell Köhler, Michael H. Fink, Maximilian Schardt, Michael Cichy, Yannik Zeh, Thomas Haas, Lukas Poguntke, Tim Jakobi, Martin Koch, Alexander W. |
author_facet | Haider, Arsalan Pigniczki, Marcell Köhler, Michael H. Fink, Maximilian Schardt, Michael Cichy, Yannik Zeh, Thomas Haas, Lukas Poguntke, Tim Jakobi, Martin Koch, Alexander W. |
author_sort | Haider, Arsalan |
collection | PubMed |
description | This work introduces a process to develop a tool-independent, high-fidelity, ray tracing-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR) model. This virtual LiDAR sensor includes accurate modeling of the scan pattern and a complete signal processing toolchain of a LiDAR sensor. It is developed as a functional mock-up unit (FMU) by using the standardized open simulation interface (OSI) 3.0.2, and functional mock-up interface (FMI) 2.0. Subsequently, it was integrated into two commercial software virtual environment frameworks to demonstrate its exchangeability. Furthermore, the accuracy of the LiDAR sensor model is validated by comparing the simulation and real measurement data on the time domain and on the point cloud level. The validation results show that the mean absolute percentage error [Formula: see text] of simulated and measured time domain signal amplitude is [Formula: see text]. In addition, the [Formula: see text] of the number of points [Formula: see text] and mean intensity [Formula: see text] values received from the virtual and real targets are [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , respectively. To the author’s knowledge, these are the smallest errors reported for the number of received points [Formula: see text] and mean intensity [Formula: see text] values up until now. Moreover, the distance error [Formula: see text] is below the range accuracy of the actual LiDAR sensor, which is 2 cm for this use case. In addition, the proving ground measurement results are compared with the state-of-the-art LiDAR model provided by commercial software and the proposed LiDAR model to measure the presented model fidelity. The results show that the complete signal processing steps and imperfections of real LiDAR sensors need to be considered in the virtual LiDAR to obtain simulation results close to the actual sensor. Such considerable imperfections are optical losses, inherent detector effects, effects generated by the electrical amplification, and noise produced by the sunlight. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9572647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95726472022-10-17 Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces Haider, Arsalan Pigniczki, Marcell Köhler, Michael H. Fink, Maximilian Schardt, Michael Cichy, Yannik Zeh, Thomas Haas, Lukas Poguntke, Tim Jakobi, Martin Koch, Alexander W. Sensors (Basel) Article This work introduces a process to develop a tool-independent, high-fidelity, ray tracing-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR) model. This virtual LiDAR sensor includes accurate modeling of the scan pattern and a complete signal processing toolchain of a LiDAR sensor. It is developed as a functional mock-up unit (FMU) by using the standardized open simulation interface (OSI) 3.0.2, and functional mock-up interface (FMI) 2.0. Subsequently, it was integrated into two commercial software virtual environment frameworks to demonstrate its exchangeability. Furthermore, the accuracy of the LiDAR sensor model is validated by comparing the simulation and real measurement data on the time domain and on the point cloud level. The validation results show that the mean absolute percentage error [Formula: see text] of simulated and measured time domain signal amplitude is [Formula: see text]. In addition, the [Formula: see text] of the number of points [Formula: see text] and mean intensity [Formula: see text] values received from the virtual and real targets are [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , respectively. To the author’s knowledge, these are the smallest errors reported for the number of received points [Formula: see text] and mean intensity [Formula: see text] values up until now. Moreover, the distance error [Formula: see text] is below the range accuracy of the actual LiDAR sensor, which is 2 cm for this use case. In addition, the proving ground measurement results are compared with the state-of-the-art LiDAR model provided by commercial software and the proposed LiDAR model to measure the presented model fidelity. The results show that the complete signal processing steps and imperfections of real LiDAR sensors need to be considered in the virtual LiDAR to obtain simulation results close to the actual sensor. Such considerable imperfections are optical losses, inherent detector effects, effects generated by the electrical amplification, and noise produced by the sunlight. MDPI 2022-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9572647/ /pubmed/36236655 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197556 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Haider, Arsalan Pigniczki, Marcell Köhler, Michael H. Fink, Maximilian Schardt, Michael Cichy, Yannik Zeh, Thomas Haas, Lukas Poguntke, Tim Jakobi, Martin Koch, Alexander W. Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces |
title | Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces |
title_full | Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces |
title_fullStr | Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces |
title_short | Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces |
title_sort | development of high-fidelity automotive lidar sensor model with standardized interfaces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236655 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197556 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haiderarsalan developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces AT pigniczkimarcell developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces AT kohlermichaelh developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces AT finkmaximilian developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces AT schardtmichael developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces AT cichyyannik developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces AT zehthomas developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces AT haaslukas developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces AT poguntketim developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces AT jakobimartin developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces AT kochalexanderw developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces |