Cargando…

Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces

This work introduces a process to develop a tool-independent, high-fidelity, ray tracing-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR) model. This virtual LiDAR sensor includes accurate modeling of the scan pattern and a complete signal processing toolchain of a LiDAR sensor. It is developed as a functi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haider, Arsalan, Pigniczki, Marcell, Köhler, Michael H., Fink, Maximilian, Schardt, Michael, Cichy, Yannik, Zeh, Thomas, Haas, Lukas, Poguntke, Tim, Jakobi, Martin, Koch, Alexander W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236655
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197556
_version_ 1784810668026757120
author Haider, Arsalan
Pigniczki, Marcell
Köhler, Michael H.
Fink, Maximilian
Schardt, Michael
Cichy, Yannik
Zeh, Thomas
Haas, Lukas
Poguntke, Tim
Jakobi, Martin
Koch, Alexander W.
author_facet Haider, Arsalan
Pigniczki, Marcell
Köhler, Michael H.
Fink, Maximilian
Schardt, Michael
Cichy, Yannik
Zeh, Thomas
Haas, Lukas
Poguntke, Tim
Jakobi, Martin
Koch, Alexander W.
author_sort Haider, Arsalan
collection PubMed
description This work introduces a process to develop a tool-independent, high-fidelity, ray tracing-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR) model. This virtual LiDAR sensor includes accurate modeling of the scan pattern and a complete signal processing toolchain of a LiDAR sensor. It is developed as a functional mock-up unit (FMU) by using the standardized open simulation interface (OSI) 3.0.2, and functional mock-up interface (FMI) 2.0. Subsequently, it was integrated into two commercial software virtual environment frameworks to demonstrate its exchangeability. Furthermore, the accuracy of the LiDAR sensor model is validated by comparing the simulation and real measurement data on the time domain and on the point cloud level. The validation results show that the mean absolute percentage error [Formula: see text] of simulated and measured time domain signal amplitude is [Formula: see text]. In addition, the [Formula: see text] of the number of points [Formula: see text] and mean intensity [Formula: see text] values received from the virtual and real targets are [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , respectively. To the author’s knowledge, these are the smallest errors reported for the number of received points [Formula: see text] and mean intensity [Formula: see text] values up until now. Moreover, the distance error [Formula: see text] is below the range accuracy of the actual LiDAR sensor, which is 2 cm for this use case. In addition, the proving ground measurement results are compared with the state-of-the-art LiDAR model provided by commercial software and the proposed LiDAR model to measure the presented model fidelity. The results show that the complete signal processing steps and imperfections of real LiDAR sensors need to be considered in the virtual LiDAR to obtain simulation results close to the actual sensor. Such considerable imperfections are optical losses, inherent detector effects, effects generated by the electrical amplification, and noise produced by the sunlight.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9572647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95726472022-10-17 Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces Haider, Arsalan Pigniczki, Marcell Köhler, Michael H. Fink, Maximilian Schardt, Michael Cichy, Yannik Zeh, Thomas Haas, Lukas Poguntke, Tim Jakobi, Martin Koch, Alexander W. Sensors (Basel) Article This work introduces a process to develop a tool-independent, high-fidelity, ray tracing-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR) model. This virtual LiDAR sensor includes accurate modeling of the scan pattern and a complete signal processing toolchain of a LiDAR sensor. It is developed as a functional mock-up unit (FMU) by using the standardized open simulation interface (OSI) 3.0.2, and functional mock-up interface (FMI) 2.0. Subsequently, it was integrated into two commercial software virtual environment frameworks to demonstrate its exchangeability. Furthermore, the accuracy of the LiDAR sensor model is validated by comparing the simulation and real measurement data on the time domain and on the point cloud level. The validation results show that the mean absolute percentage error [Formula: see text] of simulated and measured time domain signal amplitude is [Formula: see text]. In addition, the [Formula: see text] of the number of points [Formula: see text] and mean intensity [Formula: see text] values received from the virtual and real targets are [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , respectively. To the author’s knowledge, these are the smallest errors reported for the number of received points [Formula: see text] and mean intensity [Formula: see text] values up until now. Moreover, the distance error [Formula: see text] is below the range accuracy of the actual LiDAR sensor, which is 2 cm for this use case. In addition, the proving ground measurement results are compared with the state-of-the-art LiDAR model provided by commercial software and the proposed LiDAR model to measure the presented model fidelity. The results show that the complete signal processing steps and imperfections of real LiDAR sensors need to be considered in the virtual LiDAR to obtain simulation results close to the actual sensor. Such considerable imperfections are optical losses, inherent detector effects, effects generated by the electrical amplification, and noise produced by the sunlight. MDPI 2022-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9572647/ /pubmed/36236655 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197556 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Haider, Arsalan
Pigniczki, Marcell
Köhler, Michael H.
Fink, Maximilian
Schardt, Michael
Cichy, Yannik
Zeh, Thomas
Haas, Lukas
Poguntke, Tim
Jakobi, Martin
Koch, Alexander W.
Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces
title Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces
title_full Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces
title_fullStr Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces
title_full_unstemmed Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces
title_short Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces
title_sort development of high-fidelity automotive lidar sensor model with standardized interfaces
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36236655
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22197556
work_keys_str_mv AT haiderarsalan developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces
AT pigniczkimarcell developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces
AT kohlermichaelh developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces
AT finkmaximilian developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces
AT schardtmichael developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces
AT cichyyannik developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces
AT zehthomas developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces
AT haaslukas developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces
AT poguntketim developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces
AT jakobimartin developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces
AT kochalexanderw developmentofhighfidelityautomotivelidarsensormodelwithstandardizedinterfaces