Cargando…

The Diet Quality of Food-Insecure Australian Adults—A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis

Poor diet quality exacerbates risks for acute and chronic conditions. People experiencing food insecurity have an increased likelihood of lower diet quality; however, this has not been investigated in the Australian context. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine whether the diet quali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindberg, Rebecca, McNaughton, Sarah A., Abbott, Gavin, Pollard, Christina M., Yaroch, Amy L., Livingstone, Katherine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235785
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14194133
_version_ 1784810686370545664
author Lindberg, Rebecca
McNaughton, Sarah A.
Abbott, Gavin
Pollard, Christina M.
Yaroch, Amy L.
Livingstone, Katherine M.
author_facet Lindberg, Rebecca
McNaughton, Sarah A.
Abbott, Gavin
Pollard, Christina M.
Yaroch, Amy L.
Livingstone, Katherine M.
author_sort Lindberg, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description Poor diet quality exacerbates risks for acute and chronic conditions. People experiencing food insecurity have an increased likelihood of lower diet quality; however, this has not been investigated in the Australian context. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine whether the diet quality of Australian adults differed according to their household food security status. Data were analysed from a nationally representative sample (≥19 years; n = 9115) collected as part of the National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2011-12. Household food security status and socio-demographic and health characteristics were assessed using data from an 18-module health interview. A 24 h dietary recall was used to estimate food and nutrient intakes and to calculate the Dietary Guidelines Index (DGI). DGI is a food-based score (0 to 130) that assesses adherence to the 2013 Australian Dietary Guidelines. Survey-weighted linear regression models, adjusted for age and sex, were used to examine diet quality (total DGI and component scores), and total energy and nutrient intake by food security status. Adults from food-insecure households had a mean total DGI score 3.5 points lower (95% CI −5.57, −1.46) than food-secure adults (p = 0.001). Adults from households experiencing food insecurity, when compared to those who were food-secure, had several lower DGI component scores including for dietary variety (1.6 vs. 2.3, p = 0.009), fruit (3.8 vs. 5.0, p = 0.001) and vegetables (3.7 vs. 4.4, p = 0.010). Adults from food-insecure households consumed on average more carbohydrates (45.6 vs. 43.3, p = 0.004) and total sugar (21.8 vs. 19.0, p = 0.003) as a percentage of daily energy and less protein (18.5 vs. 17.2, p = 0.004), mono-unsaturated fats (11.2 vs. 11.8, p = 0.026) as a percentage of daily energy, and fibre (20.1 vs. 23.0, p = 0.003), than food-secure adults. Sub-optimal diet may be one of the contributing factors to, or outcomes of, poorer health in food-insecure populations. Food security interventions are required to better address nutrition in food-insecure households and should be tailored to the health and socio-demographic characteristics of this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9572719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95727192022-10-17 The Diet Quality of Food-Insecure Australian Adults—A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis Lindberg, Rebecca McNaughton, Sarah A. Abbott, Gavin Pollard, Christina M. Yaroch, Amy L. Livingstone, Katherine M. Nutrients Article Poor diet quality exacerbates risks for acute and chronic conditions. People experiencing food insecurity have an increased likelihood of lower diet quality; however, this has not been investigated in the Australian context. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine whether the diet quality of Australian adults differed according to their household food security status. Data were analysed from a nationally representative sample (≥19 years; n = 9115) collected as part of the National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2011-12. Household food security status and socio-demographic and health characteristics were assessed using data from an 18-module health interview. A 24 h dietary recall was used to estimate food and nutrient intakes and to calculate the Dietary Guidelines Index (DGI). DGI is a food-based score (0 to 130) that assesses adherence to the 2013 Australian Dietary Guidelines. Survey-weighted linear regression models, adjusted for age and sex, were used to examine diet quality (total DGI and component scores), and total energy and nutrient intake by food security status. Adults from food-insecure households had a mean total DGI score 3.5 points lower (95% CI −5.57, −1.46) than food-secure adults (p = 0.001). Adults from households experiencing food insecurity, when compared to those who were food-secure, had several lower DGI component scores including for dietary variety (1.6 vs. 2.3, p = 0.009), fruit (3.8 vs. 5.0, p = 0.001) and vegetables (3.7 vs. 4.4, p = 0.010). Adults from food-insecure households consumed on average more carbohydrates (45.6 vs. 43.3, p = 0.004) and total sugar (21.8 vs. 19.0, p = 0.003) as a percentage of daily energy and less protein (18.5 vs. 17.2, p = 0.004), mono-unsaturated fats (11.2 vs. 11.8, p = 0.026) as a percentage of daily energy, and fibre (20.1 vs. 23.0, p = 0.003), than food-secure adults. Sub-optimal diet may be one of the contributing factors to, or outcomes of, poorer health in food-insecure populations. Food security interventions are required to better address nutrition in food-insecure households and should be tailored to the health and socio-demographic characteristics of this population. MDPI 2022-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9572719/ /pubmed/36235785 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14194133 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lindberg, Rebecca
McNaughton, Sarah A.
Abbott, Gavin
Pollard, Christina M.
Yaroch, Amy L.
Livingstone, Katherine M.
The Diet Quality of Food-Insecure Australian Adults—A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis
title The Diet Quality of Food-Insecure Australian Adults—A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_full The Diet Quality of Food-Insecure Australian Adults—A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_fullStr The Diet Quality of Food-Insecure Australian Adults—A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Diet Quality of Food-Insecure Australian Adults—A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_short The Diet Quality of Food-Insecure Australian Adults—A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_sort diet quality of food-insecure australian adults—a nationally representative cross-sectional analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235785
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14194133
work_keys_str_mv AT lindbergrebecca thedietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis
AT mcnaughtonsaraha thedietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis
AT abbottgavin thedietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis
AT pollardchristinam thedietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis
AT yarochamyl thedietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis
AT livingstonekatherinem thedietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis
AT lindbergrebecca dietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis
AT mcnaughtonsaraha dietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis
AT abbottgavin dietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis
AT pollardchristinam dietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis
AT yarochamyl dietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis
AT livingstonekatherinem dietqualityoffoodinsecureaustralianadultsanationallyrepresentativecrosssectionalanalysis