Cargando…

Plant-Based Dietary Patterns versus Meat Consumption and Prevalence of Impaired Glucose Intolerance and Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Australian Women

This study aimed to compare the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and diabetes mellitus (DM) among Australian women following plant-based diets (PBD) compared to regular meat eaters. A cross sectional analysis of the mid-aged cohort (1946–1951) of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baleato, Courtney L., Ferguson, Jessica J. A., Oldmeadow, Christopher, Mishra, Gita D., Garg, Manohar L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14194152
_version_ 1784810845527605248
author Baleato, Courtney L.
Ferguson, Jessica J. A.
Oldmeadow, Christopher
Mishra, Gita D.
Garg, Manohar L.
author_facet Baleato, Courtney L.
Ferguson, Jessica J. A.
Oldmeadow, Christopher
Mishra, Gita D.
Garg, Manohar L.
author_sort Baleato, Courtney L.
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and diabetes mellitus (DM) among Australian women following plant-based diets (PBD) compared to regular meat eaters. A cross sectional analysis of the mid-aged cohort (1946–1951) of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health was conducted on completers of Survey 7 in 2013 with complete FFQ data available (n = 9102). Dietary patterns were categorized as PBD (vegan, lacto-ovo vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) and regular meat eaters. Meat eaters were further categorized into high and low consumption and outcomes included self-reported prevalence of IGT and DM. Participants were identified as regular meat eaters (n = 8937) and PBD (n = 175). Prevalence of IGT was lower in PBD (0–1.2%) compared to regular meat eaters (9.1%). Consolidation of PBD to a single group (vegetarians) indicated a lower prevalence of DM in vegetarians compared to regular meat eaters (3.9% vs. 9.1%). Women consuming meat daily/multiple times per day had significantly higher odds of IGT (OR 1.5, 95%CI 1.1 to 2.1, p = 0.02). Individuals consuming processed meat daily/multiple times per day had significantly higher odds of DM compared to those consuming less than daily (Odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 2.3, p < 0.0001). After adjustment for covariates, statistical significance was lost largely due to the addition of BMI to the model. Prevalence of IGT and DM were lower in women following PBD and higher in high consumers of meat and processed meat. The relationship between meat consumption and IGT/diabetes status appears to be mediated, at least in part, by an increase in body mass index (BMI). Future studies are warranted to investigate the mechanisms and other lifestyle factors underpinning the association between high meat consumption and increased risk of IGT and DM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9573342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95733422022-10-17 Plant-Based Dietary Patterns versus Meat Consumption and Prevalence of Impaired Glucose Intolerance and Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Australian Women Baleato, Courtney L. Ferguson, Jessica J. A. Oldmeadow, Christopher Mishra, Gita D. Garg, Manohar L. Nutrients Article This study aimed to compare the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and diabetes mellitus (DM) among Australian women following plant-based diets (PBD) compared to regular meat eaters. A cross sectional analysis of the mid-aged cohort (1946–1951) of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health was conducted on completers of Survey 7 in 2013 with complete FFQ data available (n = 9102). Dietary patterns were categorized as PBD (vegan, lacto-ovo vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) and regular meat eaters. Meat eaters were further categorized into high and low consumption and outcomes included self-reported prevalence of IGT and DM. Participants were identified as regular meat eaters (n = 8937) and PBD (n = 175). Prevalence of IGT was lower in PBD (0–1.2%) compared to regular meat eaters (9.1%). Consolidation of PBD to a single group (vegetarians) indicated a lower prevalence of DM in vegetarians compared to regular meat eaters (3.9% vs. 9.1%). Women consuming meat daily/multiple times per day had significantly higher odds of IGT (OR 1.5, 95%CI 1.1 to 2.1, p = 0.02). Individuals consuming processed meat daily/multiple times per day had significantly higher odds of DM compared to those consuming less than daily (Odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 2.3, p < 0.0001). After adjustment for covariates, statistical significance was lost largely due to the addition of BMI to the model. Prevalence of IGT and DM were lower in women following PBD and higher in high consumers of meat and processed meat. The relationship between meat consumption and IGT/diabetes status appears to be mediated, at least in part, by an increase in body mass index (BMI). Future studies are warranted to investigate the mechanisms and other lifestyle factors underpinning the association between high meat consumption and increased risk of IGT and DM. MDPI 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9573342/ /pubmed/36235806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14194152 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Baleato, Courtney L.
Ferguson, Jessica J. A.
Oldmeadow, Christopher
Mishra, Gita D.
Garg, Manohar L.
Plant-Based Dietary Patterns versus Meat Consumption and Prevalence of Impaired Glucose Intolerance and Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Australian Women
title Plant-Based Dietary Patterns versus Meat Consumption and Prevalence of Impaired Glucose Intolerance and Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Australian Women
title_full Plant-Based Dietary Patterns versus Meat Consumption and Prevalence of Impaired Glucose Intolerance and Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Australian Women
title_fullStr Plant-Based Dietary Patterns versus Meat Consumption and Prevalence of Impaired Glucose Intolerance and Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Australian Women
title_full_unstemmed Plant-Based Dietary Patterns versus Meat Consumption and Prevalence of Impaired Glucose Intolerance and Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Australian Women
title_short Plant-Based Dietary Patterns versus Meat Consumption and Prevalence of Impaired Glucose Intolerance and Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Australian Women
title_sort plant-based dietary patterns versus meat consumption and prevalence of impaired glucose intolerance and diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in australian women
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14194152
work_keys_str_mv AT baleatocourtneyl plantbaseddietarypatternsversusmeatconsumptionandprevalenceofimpairedglucoseintoleranceanddiabetesmellitusacrosssectionalstudyinaustralianwomen
AT fergusonjessicaja plantbaseddietarypatternsversusmeatconsumptionandprevalenceofimpairedglucoseintoleranceanddiabetesmellitusacrosssectionalstudyinaustralianwomen
AT oldmeadowchristopher plantbaseddietarypatternsversusmeatconsumptionandprevalenceofimpairedglucoseintoleranceanddiabetesmellitusacrosssectionalstudyinaustralianwomen
AT mishragitad plantbaseddietarypatternsversusmeatconsumptionandprevalenceofimpairedglucoseintoleranceanddiabetesmellitusacrosssectionalstudyinaustralianwomen
AT gargmanoharl plantbaseddietarypatternsversusmeatconsumptionandprevalenceofimpairedglucoseintoleranceanddiabetesmellitusacrosssectionalstudyinaustralianwomen