Cargando…

Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review

Management of incidentally diagnosed small testicular masses (STM) is controversial. Although there is the risk of malignancy, it might be realistic to safely seek preservation of testicles bearing benign masses. This study aims to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding prevalence of STMs, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henriques, Daniel, Mota Pinto, Anabela, Donato, Helena, Leão, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36233639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195770
_version_ 1784810873629442048
author Henriques, Daniel
Mota Pinto, Anabela
Donato, Helena
Leão, Ricardo
author_facet Henriques, Daniel
Mota Pinto, Anabela
Donato, Helena
Leão, Ricardo
author_sort Henriques, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Management of incidentally diagnosed small testicular masses (STM) is controversial. Although there is the risk of malignancy, it might be realistic to safely seek preservation of testicles bearing benign masses. This study aims to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding prevalence of STMs, their benign or malignant histology and their management. We conducted a systematic literature search for studies reporting small or incidental testicular masses and their management by radical orchiectomy, testis sparing surgery (TSS) or ultrasound (US) surveillance. We initially screened 2126 abstracts and from these, 57 studies met the inclusion criteria. Testicular masses were detected in 1.74% of patients undergoing US examination. Regarding STMs removed by surgery, 41.12% were benign. Intraoperative frozen section examination (FSE) is a reliable tool to discriminate between benign and malignant testicular masses (average 93.05% accuracy), supporting TSS. Benign lesions were associated with smaller diameter (<1 cm 68.78% benign), were often hypoechoic and exhibited regular margins on US. Conclusions: Small testicular masses are often benign. Clinical and US patterns are not accurate enough for including patients in surveillance protocols and TSS paired with FSE is pivotal for precluding the removal of testicles bearing benign lesions. Future research might unveil new imaging tools or biomarkers to support clinical management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9573452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95734522022-10-17 Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review Henriques, Daniel Mota Pinto, Anabela Donato, Helena Leão, Ricardo J Clin Med Systematic Review Management of incidentally diagnosed small testicular masses (STM) is controversial. Although there is the risk of malignancy, it might be realistic to safely seek preservation of testicles bearing benign masses. This study aims to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding prevalence of STMs, their benign or malignant histology and their management. We conducted a systematic literature search for studies reporting small or incidental testicular masses and their management by radical orchiectomy, testis sparing surgery (TSS) or ultrasound (US) surveillance. We initially screened 2126 abstracts and from these, 57 studies met the inclusion criteria. Testicular masses were detected in 1.74% of patients undergoing US examination. Regarding STMs removed by surgery, 41.12% were benign. Intraoperative frozen section examination (FSE) is a reliable tool to discriminate between benign and malignant testicular masses (average 93.05% accuracy), supporting TSS. Benign lesions were associated with smaller diameter (<1 cm 68.78% benign), were often hypoechoic and exhibited regular margins on US. Conclusions: Small testicular masses are often benign. Clinical and US patterns are not accurate enough for including patients in surveillance protocols and TSS paired with FSE is pivotal for precluding the removal of testicles bearing benign lesions. Future research might unveil new imaging tools or biomarkers to support clinical management. MDPI 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9573452/ /pubmed/36233639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195770 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Henriques, Daniel
Mota Pinto, Anabela
Donato, Helena
Leão, Ricardo
Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review
title Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review
title_full Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review
title_short Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review
title_sort prevalence and management of incidental testicular masses—a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36233639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195770
work_keys_str_mv AT henriquesdaniel prevalenceandmanagementofincidentaltesticularmassesasystematicreview
AT motapintoanabela prevalenceandmanagementofincidentaltesticularmassesasystematicreview
AT donatohelena prevalenceandmanagementofincidentaltesticularmassesasystematicreview
AT leaoricardo prevalenceandmanagementofincidentaltesticularmassesasystematicreview