Cargando…
Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review
Management of incidentally diagnosed small testicular masses (STM) is controversial. Although there is the risk of malignancy, it might be realistic to safely seek preservation of testicles bearing benign masses. This study aims to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding prevalence of STMs, t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36233639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195770 |
_version_ | 1784810873629442048 |
---|---|
author | Henriques, Daniel Mota Pinto, Anabela Donato, Helena Leão, Ricardo |
author_facet | Henriques, Daniel Mota Pinto, Anabela Donato, Helena Leão, Ricardo |
author_sort | Henriques, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Management of incidentally diagnosed small testicular masses (STM) is controversial. Although there is the risk of malignancy, it might be realistic to safely seek preservation of testicles bearing benign masses. This study aims to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding prevalence of STMs, their benign or malignant histology and their management. We conducted a systematic literature search for studies reporting small or incidental testicular masses and their management by radical orchiectomy, testis sparing surgery (TSS) or ultrasound (US) surveillance. We initially screened 2126 abstracts and from these, 57 studies met the inclusion criteria. Testicular masses were detected in 1.74% of patients undergoing US examination. Regarding STMs removed by surgery, 41.12% were benign. Intraoperative frozen section examination (FSE) is a reliable tool to discriminate between benign and malignant testicular masses (average 93.05% accuracy), supporting TSS. Benign lesions were associated with smaller diameter (<1 cm 68.78% benign), were often hypoechoic and exhibited regular margins on US. Conclusions: Small testicular masses are often benign. Clinical and US patterns are not accurate enough for including patients in surveillance protocols and TSS paired with FSE is pivotal for precluding the removal of testicles bearing benign lesions. Future research might unveil new imaging tools or biomarkers to support clinical management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9573452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95734522022-10-17 Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review Henriques, Daniel Mota Pinto, Anabela Donato, Helena Leão, Ricardo J Clin Med Systematic Review Management of incidentally diagnosed small testicular masses (STM) is controversial. Although there is the risk of malignancy, it might be realistic to safely seek preservation of testicles bearing benign masses. This study aims to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding prevalence of STMs, their benign or malignant histology and their management. We conducted a systematic literature search for studies reporting small or incidental testicular masses and their management by radical orchiectomy, testis sparing surgery (TSS) or ultrasound (US) surveillance. We initially screened 2126 abstracts and from these, 57 studies met the inclusion criteria. Testicular masses were detected in 1.74% of patients undergoing US examination. Regarding STMs removed by surgery, 41.12% were benign. Intraoperative frozen section examination (FSE) is a reliable tool to discriminate between benign and malignant testicular masses (average 93.05% accuracy), supporting TSS. Benign lesions were associated with smaller diameter (<1 cm 68.78% benign), were often hypoechoic and exhibited regular margins on US. Conclusions: Small testicular masses are often benign. Clinical and US patterns are not accurate enough for including patients in surveillance protocols and TSS paired with FSE is pivotal for precluding the removal of testicles bearing benign lesions. Future research might unveil new imaging tools or biomarkers to support clinical management. MDPI 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9573452/ /pubmed/36233639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195770 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Henriques, Daniel Mota Pinto, Anabela Donato, Helena Leão, Ricardo Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review |
title | Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review |
title_full | Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review |
title_short | Prevalence and Management of Incidental Testicular Masses—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | prevalence and management of incidental testicular masses—a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36233639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195770 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henriquesdaniel prevalenceandmanagementofincidentaltesticularmassesasystematicreview AT motapintoanabela prevalenceandmanagementofincidentaltesticularmassesasystematicreview AT donatohelena prevalenceandmanagementofincidentaltesticularmassesasystematicreview AT leaoricardo prevalenceandmanagementofincidentaltesticularmassesasystematicreview |