Cargando…
Evaluation of Different Extraction Methods on the Phenolic Profile and the Antioxidant Potential of Ceratonia siliqua L. Pods Extracts
The present work was designed to investigate the effects of different extraction processes, namely ultrasonic-assisted, supercritical fluid, microwave-assisted and Soxhlet applied to carob pods. The total phenolic quantification and the antioxidant activity were assessed by the means of rapid in vit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36234696 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196163 |
_version_ | 1784810907724939264 |
---|---|
author | Mansouri, Fouad El Silva, Joaquim C. G. Esteves Cacciola, Francesco Asraoui, Fadoua Tayeq, Hatim Ben Amar, Yasmine Mttougui Lovillo, Miguel Palma Chouaibi, Noureddine Brigui, Jamal |
author_facet | Mansouri, Fouad El Silva, Joaquim C. G. Esteves Cacciola, Francesco Asraoui, Fadoua Tayeq, Hatim Ben Amar, Yasmine Mttougui Lovillo, Miguel Palma Chouaibi, Noureddine Brigui, Jamal |
author_sort | Mansouri, Fouad El |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present work was designed to investigate the effects of different extraction processes, namely ultrasonic-assisted, supercritical fluid, microwave-assisted and Soxhlet applied to carob pods. The total phenolic quantification and the antioxidant activity were assessed by the means of rapid in vitro spectrophotometric assays; the phenolic profile was identified using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. The results revealed that the phenolic compounds and the antioxidant capacity varied significantly with the nature of the extraction process. The content of total phenolic compounds ranged from 11.55 to 34.38 mg GAE/g DW; the content of total flavonoids varied from 3.50 to 10.53 mg QE/g DW, and the content of condensed tannins fluctuated from 3.30 to 6.55 mg CE/ g DW. All extracts performed differently on antioxidant activity when determined by the DPPH assay producing a dose-dependent response, with IC(50) extended from 11.33 to 6.07 µg/mL. HPLC analysis enabled the identification of nine compounds. As a function of the studied extraction methods, the phenolic compound contents were positively correlated with antioxidant activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9573579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95735792022-10-17 Evaluation of Different Extraction Methods on the Phenolic Profile and the Antioxidant Potential of Ceratonia siliqua L. Pods Extracts Mansouri, Fouad El Silva, Joaquim C. G. Esteves Cacciola, Francesco Asraoui, Fadoua Tayeq, Hatim Ben Amar, Yasmine Mttougui Lovillo, Miguel Palma Chouaibi, Noureddine Brigui, Jamal Molecules Article The present work was designed to investigate the effects of different extraction processes, namely ultrasonic-assisted, supercritical fluid, microwave-assisted and Soxhlet applied to carob pods. The total phenolic quantification and the antioxidant activity were assessed by the means of rapid in vitro spectrophotometric assays; the phenolic profile was identified using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. The results revealed that the phenolic compounds and the antioxidant capacity varied significantly with the nature of the extraction process. The content of total phenolic compounds ranged from 11.55 to 34.38 mg GAE/g DW; the content of total flavonoids varied from 3.50 to 10.53 mg QE/g DW, and the content of condensed tannins fluctuated from 3.30 to 6.55 mg CE/ g DW. All extracts performed differently on antioxidant activity when determined by the DPPH assay producing a dose-dependent response, with IC(50) extended from 11.33 to 6.07 µg/mL. HPLC analysis enabled the identification of nine compounds. As a function of the studied extraction methods, the phenolic compound contents were positively correlated with antioxidant activity. MDPI 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9573579/ /pubmed/36234696 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196163 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mansouri, Fouad El Silva, Joaquim C. G. Esteves Cacciola, Francesco Asraoui, Fadoua Tayeq, Hatim Ben Amar, Yasmine Mttougui Lovillo, Miguel Palma Chouaibi, Noureddine Brigui, Jamal Evaluation of Different Extraction Methods on the Phenolic Profile and the Antioxidant Potential of Ceratonia siliqua L. Pods Extracts |
title | Evaluation of Different Extraction Methods on the Phenolic Profile and the Antioxidant Potential of Ceratonia siliqua L. Pods Extracts |
title_full | Evaluation of Different Extraction Methods on the Phenolic Profile and the Antioxidant Potential of Ceratonia siliqua L. Pods Extracts |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Different Extraction Methods on the Phenolic Profile and the Antioxidant Potential of Ceratonia siliqua L. Pods Extracts |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Different Extraction Methods on the Phenolic Profile and the Antioxidant Potential of Ceratonia siliqua L. Pods Extracts |
title_short | Evaluation of Different Extraction Methods on the Phenolic Profile and the Antioxidant Potential of Ceratonia siliqua L. Pods Extracts |
title_sort | evaluation of different extraction methods on the phenolic profile and the antioxidant potential of ceratonia siliqua l. pods extracts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36234696 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mansourifouadel evaluationofdifferentextractionmethodsonthephenolicprofileandtheantioxidantpotentialofceratoniasiliqualpodsextracts AT silvajoaquimcgesteves evaluationofdifferentextractionmethodsonthephenolicprofileandtheantioxidantpotentialofceratoniasiliqualpodsextracts AT cacciolafrancesco evaluationofdifferentextractionmethodsonthephenolicprofileandtheantioxidantpotentialofceratoniasiliqualpodsextracts AT asraouifadoua evaluationofdifferentextractionmethodsonthephenolicprofileandtheantioxidantpotentialofceratoniasiliqualpodsextracts AT tayeqhatim evaluationofdifferentextractionmethodsonthephenolicprofileandtheantioxidantpotentialofceratoniasiliqualpodsextracts AT benamaryasminemttougui evaluationofdifferentextractionmethodsonthephenolicprofileandtheantioxidantpotentialofceratoniasiliqualpodsextracts AT lovillomiguelpalma evaluationofdifferentextractionmethodsonthephenolicprofileandtheantioxidantpotentialofceratoniasiliqualpodsextracts AT chouaibinoureddine evaluationofdifferentextractionmethodsonthephenolicprofileandtheantioxidantpotentialofceratoniasiliqualpodsextracts AT briguijamal evaluationofdifferentextractionmethodsonthephenolicprofileandtheantioxidantpotentialofceratoniasiliqualpodsextracts |