Cargando…

Dynamic Incision under Nasal Endoscope and Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation for Nasal Inverted Papilloma: An Analysis of Differences in Efficacy and the Destructive Effect on Immune Function

METHODS: NIP patients (n = 106) admitted between January 2020 and March 2021 were selected and grouped as follows according to the random number table method: a dissection group treated with dynamical-system surgery under nasal endoscope and an ablation group treated with LTPRA. The clinical curativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Fang, Ye, Fei, Gu, Xilan, Wang, Wenbin, Yin, Xiaodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9618193
_version_ 1784810965250867200
author Liu, Fang
Ye, Fei
Gu, Xilan
Wang, Wenbin
Yin, Xiaodong
author_facet Liu, Fang
Ye, Fei
Gu, Xilan
Wang, Wenbin
Yin, Xiaodong
author_sort Liu, Fang
collection PubMed
description METHODS: NIP patients (n = 106) admitted between January 2020 and March 2021 were selected and grouped as follows according to the random number table method: a dissection group treated with dynamical-system surgery under nasal endoscope and an ablation group treated with LTPRA. The clinical curative effects of the two procedures were compared, and the related indexes (operation time (OT), intraoperative blood loss (IBL), and length of stay (LOS)) and postoperative adverse reactions (ARs) were counted. In addition, fasting venous blood samples were collected before treatment (T0), as well as 3 (T1) and 7 days after treatment (T2) to detect inflammatory factors (IFs; C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)) and T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+). Finally, all patients received a one-year follow-up to compare the differences in prognostic survival rate and disease recurrence rate between groups. RESULTS: The ablation group has a similar LOS to the dissection group (P > 0.05), but lower OT and IBL. No marked difference was observed between groups in terms of the total effective rate (P > 0.05), but the adverse reaction rate was higher in the dissection group compared with the ablation group (P < 0.05). Compared with T0, elevated CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, and CD3+ were observed in both cohorts at T1, with lower levels in the ablation group as compared to the dissection group, while CD4+ and CD8+ decreased in both cohorts and were higher in the ablation group (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the levels of CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, and CD3+ in both groups were lower at T2 compared to T1, whereas those of CD4+ and CD8+ in both groups were higher at T2 compared to T1 (P < 0.05). As indicated by the statistics on prognostic follow-up, the two cohorts of patients showed no evident difference in the 1-year survival rate and disease recurrence rate (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both dynamical-system surgery under nasal endoscope and LTPRA have good therapeutic effects on NIP, but the latter is safer and can effectively reduce the postoperative inflammatory reaction of patients and maintain the stability of immune function, which has higher clinical application value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9573818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95738182022-10-18 Dynamic Incision under Nasal Endoscope and Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation for Nasal Inverted Papilloma: An Analysis of Differences in Efficacy and the Destructive Effect on Immune Function Liu, Fang Ye, Fei Gu, Xilan Wang, Wenbin Yin, Xiaodong Comput Math Methods Med Research Article METHODS: NIP patients (n = 106) admitted between January 2020 and March 2021 were selected and grouped as follows according to the random number table method: a dissection group treated with dynamical-system surgery under nasal endoscope and an ablation group treated with LTPRA. The clinical curative effects of the two procedures were compared, and the related indexes (operation time (OT), intraoperative blood loss (IBL), and length of stay (LOS)) and postoperative adverse reactions (ARs) were counted. In addition, fasting venous blood samples were collected before treatment (T0), as well as 3 (T1) and 7 days after treatment (T2) to detect inflammatory factors (IFs; C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)) and T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+). Finally, all patients received a one-year follow-up to compare the differences in prognostic survival rate and disease recurrence rate between groups. RESULTS: The ablation group has a similar LOS to the dissection group (P > 0.05), but lower OT and IBL. No marked difference was observed between groups in terms of the total effective rate (P > 0.05), but the adverse reaction rate was higher in the dissection group compared with the ablation group (P < 0.05). Compared with T0, elevated CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, and CD3+ were observed in both cohorts at T1, with lower levels in the ablation group as compared to the dissection group, while CD4+ and CD8+ decreased in both cohorts and were higher in the ablation group (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the levels of CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, and CD3+ in both groups were lower at T2 compared to T1, whereas those of CD4+ and CD8+ in both groups were higher at T2 compared to T1 (P < 0.05). As indicated by the statistics on prognostic follow-up, the two cohorts of patients showed no evident difference in the 1-year survival rate and disease recurrence rate (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both dynamical-system surgery under nasal endoscope and LTPRA have good therapeutic effects on NIP, but the latter is safer and can effectively reduce the postoperative inflammatory reaction of patients and maintain the stability of immune function, which has higher clinical application value. Hindawi 2022-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9573818/ /pubmed/36262871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9618193 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fang Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Fang
Ye, Fei
Gu, Xilan
Wang, Wenbin
Yin, Xiaodong
Dynamic Incision under Nasal Endoscope and Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation for Nasal Inverted Papilloma: An Analysis of Differences in Efficacy and the Destructive Effect on Immune Function
title Dynamic Incision under Nasal Endoscope and Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation for Nasal Inverted Papilloma: An Analysis of Differences in Efficacy and the Destructive Effect on Immune Function
title_full Dynamic Incision under Nasal Endoscope and Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation for Nasal Inverted Papilloma: An Analysis of Differences in Efficacy and the Destructive Effect on Immune Function
title_fullStr Dynamic Incision under Nasal Endoscope and Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation for Nasal Inverted Papilloma: An Analysis of Differences in Efficacy and the Destructive Effect on Immune Function
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Incision under Nasal Endoscope and Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation for Nasal Inverted Papilloma: An Analysis of Differences in Efficacy and the Destructive Effect on Immune Function
title_short Dynamic Incision under Nasal Endoscope and Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation for Nasal Inverted Papilloma: An Analysis of Differences in Efficacy and the Destructive Effect on Immune Function
title_sort dynamic incision under nasal endoscope and low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation for nasal inverted papilloma: an analysis of differences in efficacy and the destructive effect on immune function
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9618193
work_keys_str_mv AT liufang dynamicincisionundernasalendoscopeandlowtemperatureplasmaradiofrequencyablationfornasalinvertedpapillomaananalysisofdifferencesinefficacyandthedestructiveeffectonimmunefunction
AT yefei dynamicincisionundernasalendoscopeandlowtemperatureplasmaradiofrequencyablationfornasalinvertedpapillomaananalysisofdifferencesinefficacyandthedestructiveeffectonimmunefunction
AT guxilan dynamicincisionundernasalendoscopeandlowtemperatureplasmaradiofrequencyablationfornasalinvertedpapillomaananalysisofdifferencesinefficacyandthedestructiveeffectonimmunefunction
AT wangwenbin dynamicincisionundernasalendoscopeandlowtemperatureplasmaradiofrequencyablationfornasalinvertedpapillomaananalysisofdifferencesinefficacyandthedestructiveeffectonimmunefunction
AT yinxiaodong dynamicincisionundernasalendoscopeandlowtemperatureplasmaradiofrequencyablationfornasalinvertedpapillomaananalysisofdifferencesinefficacyandthedestructiveeffectonimmunefunction