Cargando…
Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases
Conditional autoregressive (CAR) distributions are used to account for spatial autocorrelation in small areal or lattice data to assess the spatial risks of diseases. The intrinsic CAR (ICAR) distribution has been primarily used as the priori distribution of spatially autocorrelated random variables...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101872 |
_version_ | 1784810983714193408 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Guiming |
author_facet | Wang, Guiming |
author_sort | Wang, Guiming |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conditional autoregressive (CAR) distributions are used to account for spatial autocorrelation in small areal or lattice data to assess the spatial risks of diseases. The intrinsic CAR (ICAR) distribution has been primarily used as the priori distribution of spatially autocorrelated random variables in the framework of Bayesian statistics. The posterior distributions of spatial variates and unknown parameters of Bayesian ICAR models are estimated with the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods or integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA), which may suffer from failures in numeric convergence. This study used the Laplace approximation, a fast computational method available in software Template Model Builder (TMB), for the maximum likelihood estimation (MLEs) of the ICAR model parameters. This study used the TMB to integrate out the latent spatial variates for the fast computations of marginal likelihood functions. This study compared the runtime and performance among the TMB, MCMC, and INLA implementations with three case studies of human diseases in the United Kingdom and the United States. The MLEs of the ICAR model with TMB were similar to those by the MCMC and INLA methods. The TMB implementation was faster than the MCMC (up to 100–200 times) and INLA (nine times) models. • This study built conditional autoregressive models in template model builder • TMB implementation was 100-200 times faster than the MCMC method • TMB implementation was also faster than Bayesian approximation with R INLA |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9573915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95739152022-10-18 Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases Wang, Guiming MethodsX Method Article Conditional autoregressive (CAR) distributions are used to account for spatial autocorrelation in small areal or lattice data to assess the spatial risks of diseases. The intrinsic CAR (ICAR) distribution has been primarily used as the priori distribution of spatially autocorrelated random variables in the framework of Bayesian statistics. The posterior distributions of spatial variates and unknown parameters of Bayesian ICAR models are estimated with the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods or integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA), which may suffer from failures in numeric convergence. This study used the Laplace approximation, a fast computational method available in software Template Model Builder (TMB), for the maximum likelihood estimation (MLEs) of the ICAR model parameters. This study used the TMB to integrate out the latent spatial variates for the fast computations of marginal likelihood functions. This study compared the runtime and performance among the TMB, MCMC, and INLA implementations with three case studies of human diseases in the United Kingdom and the United States. The MLEs of the ICAR model with TMB were similar to those by the MCMC and INLA methods. The TMB implementation was faster than the MCMC (up to 100–200 times) and INLA (nine times) models. • This study built conditional autoregressive models in template model builder • TMB implementation was 100-200 times faster than the MCMC method • TMB implementation was also faster than Bayesian approximation with R INLA Elsevier 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9573915/ /pubmed/36262319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101872 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Method Article Wang, Guiming Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases |
title | Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases |
title_full | Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases |
title_fullStr | Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases |
title_short | Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases |
title_sort | laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases |
topic | Method Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangguiming laplaceapproximationforconditionalautoregressivemodelsforspatialdataofdiseases |