Cargando…

Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases

Conditional autoregressive (CAR) distributions are used to account for spatial autocorrelation in small areal or lattice data to assess the spatial risks of diseases. The intrinsic CAR (ICAR) distribution has been primarily used as the priori distribution of spatially autocorrelated random variables...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wang, Guiming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101872
_version_ 1784810983714193408
author Wang, Guiming
author_facet Wang, Guiming
author_sort Wang, Guiming
collection PubMed
description Conditional autoregressive (CAR) distributions are used to account for spatial autocorrelation in small areal or lattice data to assess the spatial risks of diseases. The intrinsic CAR (ICAR) distribution has been primarily used as the priori distribution of spatially autocorrelated random variables in the framework of Bayesian statistics. The posterior distributions of spatial variates and unknown parameters of Bayesian ICAR models are estimated with the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods or integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA), which may suffer from failures in numeric convergence. This study used the Laplace approximation, a fast computational method available in software Template Model Builder (TMB), for the maximum likelihood estimation (MLEs) of the ICAR model parameters. This study used the TMB to integrate out the latent spatial variates for the fast computations of marginal likelihood functions. This study compared the runtime and performance among the TMB, MCMC, and INLA implementations with three case studies of human diseases in the United Kingdom and the United States. The MLEs of the ICAR model with TMB were similar to those by the MCMC and INLA methods. The TMB implementation was faster than the MCMC (up to 100–200 times) and INLA (nine times) models. • This study built conditional autoregressive models in template model builder • TMB implementation was 100-200 times faster than the MCMC method • TMB implementation was also faster than Bayesian approximation with R INLA
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9573915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95739152022-10-18 Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases Wang, Guiming MethodsX Method Article Conditional autoregressive (CAR) distributions are used to account for spatial autocorrelation in small areal or lattice data to assess the spatial risks of diseases. The intrinsic CAR (ICAR) distribution has been primarily used as the priori distribution of spatially autocorrelated random variables in the framework of Bayesian statistics. The posterior distributions of spatial variates and unknown parameters of Bayesian ICAR models are estimated with the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods or integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA), which may suffer from failures in numeric convergence. This study used the Laplace approximation, a fast computational method available in software Template Model Builder (TMB), for the maximum likelihood estimation (MLEs) of the ICAR model parameters. This study used the TMB to integrate out the latent spatial variates for the fast computations of marginal likelihood functions. This study compared the runtime and performance among the TMB, MCMC, and INLA implementations with three case studies of human diseases in the United Kingdom and the United States. The MLEs of the ICAR model with TMB were similar to those by the MCMC and INLA methods. The TMB implementation was faster than the MCMC (up to 100–200 times) and INLA (nine times) models. • This study built conditional autoregressive models in template model builder • TMB implementation was 100-200 times faster than the MCMC method • TMB implementation was also faster than Bayesian approximation with R INLA Elsevier 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9573915/ /pubmed/36262319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101872 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Method Article
Wang, Guiming
Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases
title Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases
title_full Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases
title_fullStr Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases
title_full_unstemmed Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases
title_short Laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases
title_sort laplace approximation for conditional autoregressive models for spatial data of diseases
topic Method Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101872
work_keys_str_mv AT wangguiming laplaceapproximationforconditionalautoregressivemodelsforspatialdataofdiseases