Cargando…

Post stroke intervention trial in fatigue (POSITIF): Randomised multicentre feasibility trial

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of a telephone delivered intervention, informed by cognitive behavioural principles, for post-stroke fatigue, and estimated its effect on fatigue and other outcomes. DESIGN: Randomised controlled parallel group trial. SETTING: Three Scottish stroke services. SUBJEC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mead, Gillian, Gillespie, David, Barber, Mark, House, Allan, Lewis, Steff, Ensor, Hannah, Wu, Simiao, Chalder, Trudie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155221113908
_version_ 1784811012341366784
author Mead, Gillian
Gillespie, David
Barber, Mark
House, Allan
Lewis, Steff
Ensor, Hannah
Wu, Simiao
Chalder, Trudie
author_facet Mead, Gillian
Gillespie, David
Barber, Mark
House, Allan
Lewis, Steff
Ensor, Hannah
Wu, Simiao
Chalder, Trudie
author_sort Mead, Gillian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of a telephone delivered intervention, informed by cognitive behavioural principles, for post-stroke fatigue, and estimated its effect on fatigue and other outcomes. DESIGN: Randomised controlled parallel group trial. SETTING: Three Scottish stroke services. SUBJECTS: Stroke survivors with fatigue three months to two years post-stroke onset. INTERVENTIONS: Seven telephone calls (fortnightly then a ‘booster session’ at 16 weeks) of a manualised intervention, plus information about fatigue, versus information only. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility of trial methods, and collected outcome measures (fatigue, mood, anxiety, social participation, quality of life, return to work) just before randomisation, at the end of treatment (four months after randomisation) and at six months after randomisation. RESULTS: Between October 2018 and January 2020, we invited 886 stroke survivors to participate in postal screening: 188/886 (21%) returned questionnaires and consented, of whom 76/188 (40%) were eligible and returned baseline forms; 64/76 (84%) returned six month follow-up questionnaires. Of the 39 allocated the intervention, 23 (59%) attended at least four sessions. At six months, there were no significant differences between the groups (adjusted mean differences in Fatigue Assessment Scale −0.619 (95% CI −4.9631, 3.694; p = 0.768), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 −0.178 (95% CI −3.823, 3.467, p = 0.92), and the Patient Health Questionnaire −0.247 (95% CI −2.935, 2.442, p = 0.851). There were no between-group differences in quality of life, social participation or return to work. CONCLUSION: Patients can be recruited to a trial of this design. These data will inform the design of further trials in post-stroke fatigue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9574032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95740322022-10-18 Post stroke intervention trial in fatigue (POSITIF): Randomised multicentre feasibility trial Mead, Gillian Gillespie, David Barber, Mark House, Allan Lewis, Steff Ensor, Hannah Wu, Simiao Chalder, Trudie Clin Rehabil Evaluative Studies OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of a telephone delivered intervention, informed by cognitive behavioural principles, for post-stroke fatigue, and estimated its effect on fatigue and other outcomes. DESIGN: Randomised controlled parallel group trial. SETTING: Three Scottish stroke services. SUBJECTS: Stroke survivors with fatigue three months to two years post-stroke onset. INTERVENTIONS: Seven telephone calls (fortnightly then a ‘booster session’ at 16 weeks) of a manualised intervention, plus information about fatigue, versus information only. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility of trial methods, and collected outcome measures (fatigue, mood, anxiety, social participation, quality of life, return to work) just before randomisation, at the end of treatment (four months after randomisation) and at six months after randomisation. RESULTS: Between October 2018 and January 2020, we invited 886 stroke survivors to participate in postal screening: 188/886 (21%) returned questionnaires and consented, of whom 76/188 (40%) were eligible and returned baseline forms; 64/76 (84%) returned six month follow-up questionnaires. Of the 39 allocated the intervention, 23 (59%) attended at least four sessions. At six months, there were no significant differences between the groups (adjusted mean differences in Fatigue Assessment Scale −0.619 (95% CI −4.9631, 3.694; p = 0.768), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 −0.178 (95% CI −3.823, 3.467, p = 0.92), and the Patient Health Questionnaire −0.247 (95% CI −2.935, 2.442, p = 0.851). There were no between-group differences in quality of life, social participation or return to work. CONCLUSION: Patients can be recruited to a trial of this design. These data will inform the design of further trials in post-stroke fatigue. SAGE Publications 2022-07-21 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9574032/ /pubmed/35866206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155221113908 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Evaluative Studies
Mead, Gillian
Gillespie, David
Barber, Mark
House, Allan
Lewis, Steff
Ensor, Hannah
Wu, Simiao
Chalder, Trudie
Post stroke intervention trial in fatigue (POSITIF): Randomised multicentre feasibility trial
title Post stroke intervention trial in fatigue (POSITIF): Randomised multicentre feasibility trial
title_full Post stroke intervention trial in fatigue (POSITIF): Randomised multicentre feasibility trial
title_fullStr Post stroke intervention trial in fatigue (POSITIF): Randomised multicentre feasibility trial
title_full_unstemmed Post stroke intervention trial in fatigue (POSITIF): Randomised multicentre feasibility trial
title_short Post stroke intervention trial in fatigue (POSITIF): Randomised multicentre feasibility trial
title_sort post stroke intervention trial in fatigue (positif): randomised multicentre feasibility trial
topic Evaluative Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155221113908
work_keys_str_mv AT meadgillian poststrokeinterventiontrialinfatiguepositifrandomisedmulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT gillespiedavid poststrokeinterventiontrialinfatiguepositifrandomisedmulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT barbermark poststrokeinterventiontrialinfatiguepositifrandomisedmulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT houseallan poststrokeinterventiontrialinfatiguepositifrandomisedmulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT lewissteff poststrokeinterventiontrialinfatiguepositifrandomisedmulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT ensorhannah poststrokeinterventiontrialinfatiguepositifrandomisedmulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT wusimiao poststrokeinterventiontrialinfatiguepositifrandomisedmulticentrefeasibilitytrial
AT chaldertrudie poststrokeinterventiontrialinfatiguepositifrandomisedmulticentrefeasibilitytrial