Cargando…
Comparative analysis of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human AML bone marrow cells and AML cell lines
Cellular crosstalk between hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells and the bone marrow (BM) niche is vital for the development and maintenance of myeloid malignancies. These compartments can communicate via bidirectional transfer of extracellular vesicles (EVs). EV trafficking in acute myeloid leukemia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263223 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.949261 |
_version_ | 1784811020786597888 |
---|---|
author | Lang, Jonas B. Buck, Michèle C. Rivière, Jennifer Stambouli, Oumaima Sachenbacher, Ken Choudhary, Purva Dietz, Hendrik Giebel, Bernd Bassermann, Florian Oostendorp, Robert A. J. Götze, Katharina S. Hecker, Judith S. |
author_facet | Lang, Jonas B. Buck, Michèle C. Rivière, Jennifer Stambouli, Oumaima Sachenbacher, Ken Choudhary, Purva Dietz, Hendrik Giebel, Bernd Bassermann, Florian Oostendorp, Robert A. J. Götze, Katharina S. Hecker, Judith S. |
author_sort | Lang, Jonas B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cellular crosstalk between hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells and the bone marrow (BM) niche is vital for the development and maintenance of myeloid malignancies. These compartments can communicate via bidirectional transfer of extracellular vesicles (EVs). EV trafficking in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) plays a crucial role in shaping the BM microenvironment into a leukemia-permissive niche. Although several EV isolation methods have been developed, it remains a major challenge to define the most accurate and reliable procedure. Here, we tested the efficacy and functional assay compatibility of four different EV isolation methods in leukemia-derived EVs: (1) membrane affinity-based: exoEasy Kit alone and (2) in combination with Amicon filtration; (3) precipitation: ExoQuick-TC; and (4) ultracentrifugation (UC). Western blot analysis of EV fractions showed the highest enrichment of EV marker expression (e.g., CD63, HSP70, and TSG101) by precipitation with removal of overabundant soluble proteins [e.g., bovine serum albumin (BSA)], which were not discarded using UC. Besides the presence of damaged EVs after UC, intact EVs were successfully isolated with all methods as evidenced by highly maintained spherical- and cup-shaped vesicles in transmission electron microscopy. Nanoparticle tracking analysis of EV particle size and concentration revealed significant differences in EV isolation efficacy, with exoEasy Kit providing the highest EV yield recovery. Of note, functional assays with exoEasy Kit-isolated EVs showed significant toxicity towards treated target cells [e.g., mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)], which was abrogated when combining exoEasy Kit with Amicon filtration. Additionally, MSC treated with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged exoEasy Kit-isolated EVs did not show any EV uptake, while EV isolation by precipitation demonstrated efficient EV internalization. Taken together, the choice of EV isolation procedure significantly impacts the yield and potential functionality of leukemia-derived EVs. The cheapest method (UC) resulted in contaminated and destructed EV fractions, while the isolation method with the highest EV yield (exoEasy Kit) appeared to be incompatible with functional assays. We identified two methods (precipitation-based ExoQuick-TC and membrane affinity-based exoEasy Kit combined with Amicon filtration) yielding pure and intact EVs, also suitable for application in functional assays. This study highlights the importance of selecting the right EV isolation method depending on the desired experimental design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9574064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95740642022-10-18 Comparative analysis of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human AML bone marrow cells and AML cell lines Lang, Jonas B. Buck, Michèle C. Rivière, Jennifer Stambouli, Oumaima Sachenbacher, Ken Choudhary, Purva Dietz, Hendrik Giebel, Bernd Bassermann, Florian Oostendorp, Robert A. J. Götze, Katharina S. Hecker, Judith S. Front Oncol Oncology Cellular crosstalk between hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells and the bone marrow (BM) niche is vital for the development and maintenance of myeloid malignancies. These compartments can communicate via bidirectional transfer of extracellular vesicles (EVs). EV trafficking in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) plays a crucial role in shaping the BM microenvironment into a leukemia-permissive niche. Although several EV isolation methods have been developed, it remains a major challenge to define the most accurate and reliable procedure. Here, we tested the efficacy and functional assay compatibility of four different EV isolation methods in leukemia-derived EVs: (1) membrane affinity-based: exoEasy Kit alone and (2) in combination with Amicon filtration; (3) precipitation: ExoQuick-TC; and (4) ultracentrifugation (UC). Western blot analysis of EV fractions showed the highest enrichment of EV marker expression (e.g., CD63, HSP70, and TSG101) by precipitation with removal of overabundant soluble proteins [e.g., bovine serum albumin (BSA)], which were not discarded using UC. Besides the presence of damaged EVs after UC, intact EVs were successfully isolated with all methods as evidenced by highly maintained spherical- and cup-shaped vesicles in transmission electron microscopy. Nanoparticle tracking analysis of EV particle size and concentration revealed significant differences in EV isolation efficacy, with exoEasy Kit providing the highest EV yield recovery. Of note, functional assays with exoEasy Kit-isolated EVs showed significant toxicity towards treated target cells [e.g., mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)], which was abrogated when combining exoEasy Kit with Amicon filtration. Additionally, MSC treated with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged exoEasy Kit-isolated EVs did not show any EV uptake, while EV isolation by precipitation demonstrated efficient EV internalization. Taken together, the choice of EV isolation procedure significantly impacts the yield and potential functionality of leukemia-derived EVs. The cheapest method (UC) resulted in contaminated and destructed EV fractions, while the isolation method with the highest EV yield (exoEasy Kit) appeared to be incompatible with functional assays. We identified two methods (precipitation-based ExoQuick-TC and membrane affinity-based exoEasy Kit combined with Amicon filtration) yielding pure and intact EVs, also suitable for application in functional assays. This study highlights the importance of selecting the right EV isolation method depending on the desired experimental design. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9574064/ /pubmed/36263223 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.949261 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lang, Buck, Rivière, Stambouli, Sachenbacher, Choudhary, Dietz, Giebel, Bassermann, Oostendorp, Götze and Hecker https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Lang, Jonas B. Buck, Michèle C. Rivière, Jennifer Stambouli, Oumaima Sachenbacher, Ken Choudhary, Purva Dietz, Hendrik Giebel, Bernd Bassermann, Florian Oostendorp, Robert A. J. Götze, Katharina S. Hecker, Judith S. Comparative analysis of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human AML bone marrow cells and AML cell lines |
title | Comparative analysis of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human AML bone marrow cells and AML cell lines |
title_full | Comparative analysis of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human AML bone marrow cells and AML cell lines |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human AML bone marrow cells and AML cell lines |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human AML bone marrow cells and AML cell lines |
title_short | Comparative analysis of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human AML bone marrow cells and AML cell lines |
title_sort | comparative analysis of extracellular vesicle isolation methods from human aml bone marrow cells and aml cell lines |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263223 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.949261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langjonasb comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines AT buckmichelec comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines AT rivierejennifer comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines AT stamboulioumaima comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines AT sachenbacherken comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines AT choudharypurva comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines AT dietzhendrik comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines AT giebelbernd comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines AT bassermannflorian comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines AT oostendorprobertaj comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines AT gotzekatharinas comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines AT heckerjudiths comparativeanalysisofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsfromhumanamlbonemarrowcellsandamlcelllines |