Cargando…
Development and validation of a military fear avoidance questionnaire
Chronic pain due to musculoskeletal injury is one of the leading causes of disability and reduced combat readiness in the U.S. Army. Unidimensional pain management systems are not effective in addressing the complex phenomenon of pain-related disability. Growing evidence has supported use of the Fea...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262915 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.979776 |
_version_ | 1784811022071103488 |
---|---|
author | Cooper, Carly Frey, Bruce Day, Charles |
author_facet | Cooper, Carly Frey, Bruce Day, Charles |
author_sort | Cooper, Carly |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chronic pain due to musculoskeletal injury is one of the leading causes of disability and reduced combat readiness in the U.S. Army. Unidimensional pain management systems are not effective in addressing the complex phenomenon of pain-related disability. Growing evidence has supported use of the Fear Avoidance Model (FAM) as a suitable model to address pain-related disability and chronicity from a multidimensional pain neuroscience approach. While several fear avoidance measurement tools exist, one that addresses the complexity of the Army environment encouraged the authors to develop and test the reliability and validity of a military specific questionnaire. This study developed and validated an Army specific fear avoidance screening, the Return to Duty Readiness Questionnaire (RDRQ), which subsequently demonstrated good psychometric properties. Reliability coefficients demonstrate high internal consistency values both during pilot study (α = 0.96) and validation study (α = 0.94, ωt = 0.94). A Correlation Coefficient of 0.74 when compared with the Fear Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) suggests good concurrent validity. Future study should include replication in a new army population, investigation of responsiveness, test-retest reliability, structural validity and establishing severity scores with minimal clinically important differences to enhance utility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9574069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95740692022-10-18 Development and validation of a military fear avoidance questionnaire Cooper, Carly Frey, Bruce Day, Charles Front Rehabil Sci Rehabilitation Sciences Chronic pain due to musculoskeletal injury is one of the leading causes of disability and reduced combat readiness in the U.S. Army. Unidimensional pain management systems are not effective in addressing the complex phenomenon of pain-related disability. Growing evidence has supported use of the Fear Avoidance Model (FAM) as a suitable model to address pain-related disability and chronicity from a multidimensional pain neuroscience approach. While several fear avoidance measurement tools exist, one that addresses the complexity of the Army environment encouraged the authors to develop and test the reliability and validity of a military specific questionnaire. This study developed and validated an Army specific fear avoidance screening, the Return to Duty Readiness Questionnaire (RDRQ), which subsequently demonstrated good psychometric properties. Reliability coefficients demonstrate high internal consistency values both during pilot study (α = 0.96) and validation study (α = 0.94, ωt = 0.94). A Correlation Coefficient of 0.74 when compared with the Fear Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) suggests good concurrent validity. Future study should include replication in a new army population, investigation of responsiveness, test-retest reliability, structural validity and establishing severity scores with minimal clinically important differences to enhance utility. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9574069/ /pubmed/36262915 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.979776 Text en © 2022 Cooper, Frey and Day. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Sciences Cooper, Carly Frey, Bruce Day, Charles Development and validation of a military fear avoidance questionnaire |
title | Development and validation of a military fear avoidance questionnaire |
title_full | Development and validation of a military fear avoidance questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a military fear avoidance questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a military fear avoidance questionnaire |
title_short | Development and validation of a military fear avoidance questionnaire |
title_sort | development and validation of a military fear avoidance questionnaire |
topic | Rehabilitation Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262915 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.979776 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coopercarly developmentandvalidationofamilitaryfearavoidancequestionnaire AT freybruce developmentandvalidationofamilitaryfearavoidancequestionnaire AT daycharles developmentandvalidationofamilitaryfearavoidancequestionnaire |