Cargando…

The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: The global shift of trends to minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases has become prominent in India for few decades. We aimed to assess the current status of MIS techniques for lumbar interbody fusion and their surgical outcomes in the Indian population. MA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Ashutosh, Sardhara, Jayesh, Mishra, Prabhaker, Kapoor, Vishwas, Mehrotra, Anant, Raiyani, Vandan, Singh, Mayank, Goyal, Nishant, Kulkarni, Arvind G., Srikantha, Umesh, Bhaisora, Kamlesh Singh, Das, Kuntal Kanti, Srivastava, Arun K., Behari, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263335
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_4_22
_version_ 1784811030334930944
author Kumar, Ashutosh
Sardhara, Jayesh
Mishra, Prabhaker
Kapoor, Vishwas
Mehrotra, Anant
Raiyani, Vandan
Singh, Mayank
Goyal, Nishant
Kulkarni, Arvind G.
Srikantha, Umesh
Bhaisora, Kamlesh Singh
Das, Kuntal Kanti
Srivastava, Arun K.
Behari, Sanjay
author_facet Kumar, Ashutosh
Sardhara, Jayesh
Mishra, Prabhaker
Kapoor, Vishwas
Mehrotra, Anant
Raiyani, Vandan
Singh, Mayank
Goyal, Nishant
Kulkarni, Arvind G.
Srikantha, Umesh
Bhaisora, Kamlesh Singh
Das, Kuntal Kanti
Srivastava, Arun K.
Behari, Sanjay
author_sort Kumar, Ashutosh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The global shift of trends to minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases has become prominent in India for few decades. We aimed to assess the current status of MIS techniques for lumbar interbody fusion and their surgical outcomes in the Indian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review (following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines) was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar till November 2020. The primary (visual analog scale [VAS] and oswestry disability index [ODI] scores; intraoperative blood loss; duration of surgery; duration of hospital stay, and fusion rate) and secondary (wound-associated complications and dural tear/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak) outcomes were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 software. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies comprising a total of 1318 patients were included for analysis. The pooled mean of follow-up duration was 26.64 ± 8.43 months (range 5.7–36.5 months). Degenerative spondylolisthesis of Myerding grade I/II was the most common indication, followed by lytic listhesis, herniated prolapsed disc, and lumbar canal stenosis. The calculated pooled standard mean difference (SMD) suggested a significant decrease in postoperative ODI scores (SMD = 5.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.77–7.29; P < 0.01) and VAS scores (SMD = 6.50, 95% CI = 4.6–8.4; P < 0.01). The pooled mean blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay, duration of surgery, and fusion rate were 127.75 ± 52.79 mL, 4.78 ± 3.88 days, 178.59 ± 38.69 min, and 97.53% ± 2.69%, respectively. A total of 334 adverse events were recorded in 1318 patients, giving a complication rate of 25.34%. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is the most common minimally invasive technique employed for lumbar interbody fusion in India, while oblique lumbar interbody fusion is in the initial stages. The surgical and outcome-related factors improved significantly after MIS LIF in the Indian population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9574105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95741052022-10-18 The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis Kumar, Ashutosh Sardhara, Jayesh Mishra, Prabhaker Kapoor, Vishwas Mehrotra, Anant Raiyani, Vandan Singh, Mayank Goyal, Nishant Kulkarni, Arvind G. Srikantha, Umesh Bhaisora, Kamlesh Singh Das, Kuntal Kanti Srivastava, Arun K. Behari, Sanjay J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Review Article OBJECTIVE: The global shift of trends to minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases has become prominent in India for few decades. We aimed to assess the current status of MIS techniques for lumbar interbody fusion and their surgical outcomes in the Indian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review (following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines) was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar till November 2020. The primary (visual analog scale [VAS] and oswestry disability index [ODI] scores; intraoperative blood loss; duration of surgery; duration of hospital stay, and fusion rate) and secondary (wound-associated complications and dural tear/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak) outcomes were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 software. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies comprising a total of 1318 patients were included for analysis. The pooled mean of follow-up duration was 26.64 ± 8.43 months (range 5.7–36.5 months). Degenerative spondylolisthesis of Myerding grade I/II was the most common indication, followed by lytic listhesis, herniated prolapsed disc, and lumbar canal stenosis. The calculated pooled standard mean difference (SMD) suggested a significant decrease in postoperative ODI scores (SMD = 5.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.77–7.29; P < 0.01) and VAS scores (SMD = 6.50, 95% CI = 4.6–8.4; P < 0.01). The pooled mean blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay, duration of surgery, and fusion rate were 127.75 ± 52.79 mL, 4.78 ± 3.88 days, 178.59 ± 38.69 min, and 97.53% ± 2.69%, respectively. A total of 334 adverse events were recorded in 1318 patients, giving a complication rate of 25.34%. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is the most common minimally invasive technique employed for lumbar interbody fusion in India, while oblique lumbar interbody fusion is in the initial stages. The surgical and outcome-related factors improved significantly after MIS LIF in the Indian population. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9574105/ /pubmed/36263335 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_4_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kumar, Ashutosh
Sardhara, Jayesh
Mishra, Prabhaker
Kapoor, Vishwas
Mehrotra, Anant
Raiyani, Vandan
Singh, Mayank
Goyal, Nishant
Kulkarni, Arvind G.
Srikantha, Umesh
Bhaisora, Kamlesh Singh
Das, Kuntal Kanti
Srivastava, Arun K.
Behari, Sanjay
The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in india: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263335
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_4_22
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarashutosh thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sardharajayesh thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mishraprabhaker thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kapoorvishwas thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mehrotraanant thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT raiyanivandan thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT singhmayank thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goyalnishant thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kulkarniarvindg thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT srikanthaumesh thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bhaisorakamleshsingh thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daskuntalkanti thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT srivastavaarunk thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT beharisanjay thecurrentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kumarashutosh currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sardharajayesh currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mishraprabhaker currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kapoorvishwas currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mehrotraanant currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT raiyanivandan currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT singhmayank currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goyalnishant currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kulkarniarvindg currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT srikanthaumesh currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bhaisorakamleshsingh currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daskuntalkanti currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT srivastavaarunk currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT beharisanjay currentstatusandsurgicaloutcomeoftheminimallyinvasivetechniquesforlumbarinterbodyfusioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis