Cargando…

A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity?

BACKGROUND: Cognitive training elicits mild-to-moderate improvements in cognitive functioning in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), although response heterogeneity limits overall effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient characteristics associated with response and non-response to cognitive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prouskas, Stefanos E, Schoonheim, Menno M, Huiskamp, Marijn, Steenwijk, Martijn D, Gehring, Karin, Barkhof, Frederik, de Jong, Brigit A, Sitskoorn, Margriet M, Geurts, Jeroen JG, Hulst, Hanneke E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35765748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585221103134
_version_ 1784811062295527424
author Prouskas, Stefanos E
Schoonheim, Menno M
Huiskamp, Marijn
Steenwijk, Martijn D
Gehring, Karin
Barkhof, Frederik
de Jong, Brigit A
Sitskoorn, Margriet M
Geurts, Jeroen JG
Hulst, Hanneke E
author_facet Prouskas, Stefanos E
Schoonheim, Menno M
Huiskamp, Marijn
Steenwijk, Martijn D
Gehring, Karin
Barkhof, Frederik
de Jong, Brigit A
Sitskoorn, Margriet M
Geurts, Jeroen JG
Hulst, Hanneke E
author_sort Prouskas, Stefanos E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cognitive training elicits mild-to-moderate improvements in cognitive functioning in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), although response heterogeneity limits overall effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient characteristics associated with response and non-response to cognitive training. METHODS: Eighty-two PwMS were randomized into a 7-week attention training (n = 58, age = 48.4 ± 10.2 years) or a waiting-list control group (n = 24, age = 48.5 ± 9.4 years). Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at baseline and post-intervention. Twenty-one healthy controls (HCs, age = 50.27 ± 10.15 years) were included at baseline. Responders were defined with a reliable change index of 1.64 on at least 2/6 cognitive domains. General linear models and logistic regression were applied. RESULTS: Responders (n = 36) and non-responders (n = 22) did not differ on demographics, clinical variables and baseline cognition and structural MRI. However, non-responders exhibited a higher baseline functional connectivity (FC) between the default-mode network (DMN) and the ventral attention network (VAN), compared with responders (p = 0.018) and HCs (p = 0.001). Conversely, responders exhibited no significant baseline differences in FC compared with HCs. Response to cognitive training was predicted by lower DMN-VAN FC (p = 0.004) and DMN-frontoparietal FC (p = 0.029) (Nagelkerke R(2) = 0.25). CONCLUSION: An intact pre-intervention FC is associated with cognitive training responsivity in pwMS, suggesting a window of opportunity for successful cognitive interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9574229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95742292022-10-18 A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity? Prouskas, Stefanos E Schoonheim, Menno M Huiskamp, Marijn Steenwijk, Martijn D Gehring, Karin Barkhof, Frederik de Jong, Brigit A Sitskoorn, Margriet M Geurts, Jeroen JG Hulst, Hanneke E Mult Scler Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: Cognitive training elicits mild-to-moderate improvements in cognitive functioning in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), although response heterogeneity limits overall effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient characteristics associated with response and non-response to cognitive training. METHODS: Eighty-two PwMS were randomized into a 7-week attention training (n = 58, age = 48.4 ± 10.2 years) or a waiting-list control group (n = 24, age = 48.5 ± 9.4 years). Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at baseline and post-intervention. Twenty-one healthy controls (HCs, age = 50.27 ± 10.15 years) were included at baseline. Responders were defined with a reliable change index of 1.64 on at least 2/6 cognitive domains. General linear models and logistic regression were applied. RESULTS: Responders (n = 36) and non-responders (n = 22) did not differ on demographics, clinical variables and baseline cognition and structural MRI. However, non-responders exhibited a higher baseline functional connectivity (FC) between the default-mode network (DMN) and the ventral attention network (VAN), compared with responders (p = 0.018) and HCs (p = 0.001). Conversely, responders exhibited no significant baseline differences in FC compared with HCs. Response to cognitive training was predicted by lower DMN-VAN FC (p = 0.004) and DMN-frontoparietal FC (p = 0.029) (Nagelkerke R(2) = 0.25). CONCLUSION: An intact pre-intervention FC is associated with cognitive training responsivity in pwMS, suggesting a window of opportunity for successful cognitive interventions. SAGE Publications 2022-06-28 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9574229/ /pubmed/35765748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585221103134 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Prouskas, Stefanos E
Schoonheim, Menno M
Huiskamp, Marijn
Steenwijk, Martijn D
Gehring, Karin
Barkhof, Frederik
de Jong, Brigit A
Sitskoorn, Margriet M
Geurts, Jeroen JG
Hulst, Hanneke E
A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity?
title A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity?
title_full A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity?
title_fullStr A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity?
title_full_unstemmed A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity?
title_short A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity?
title_sort randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: is there a window of opportunity?
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35765748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585221103134
work_keys_str_mv AT prouskasstefanose arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT schoonheimmennom arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT huiskampmarijn arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT steenwijkmartijnd arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT gehringkarin arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT barkhoffrederik arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT dejongbrigita arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT sitskoornmargrietm arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT geurtsjeroenjg arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT hulsthannekee arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT prouskasstefanose randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT schoonheimmennom randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT huiskampmarijn randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT steenwijkmartijnd randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT gehringkarin randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT barkhoffrederik randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT dejongbrigita randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT sitskoornmargrietm randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT geurtsjeroenjg randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity
AT hulsthannekee randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity