Cargando…
A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity?
BACKGROUND: Cognitive training elicits mild-to-moderate improvements in cognitive functioning in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), although response heterogeneity limits overall effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient characteristics associated with response and non-response to cognitive...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35765748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585221103134 |
_version_ | 1784811062295527424 |
---|---|
author | Prouskas, Stefanos E Schoonheim, Menno M Huiskamp, Marijn Steenwijk, Martijn D Gehring, Karin Barkhof, Frederik de Jong, Brigit A Sitskoorn, Margriet M Geurts, Jeroen JG Hulst, Hanneke E |
author_facet | Prouskas, Stefanos E Schoonheim, Menno M Huiskamp, Marijn Steenwijk, Martijn D Gehring, Karin Barkhof, Frederik de Jong, Brigit A Sitskoorn, Margriet M Geurts, Jeroen JG Hulst, Hanneke E |
author_sort | Prouskas, Stefanos E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cognitive training elicits mild-to-moderate improvements in cognitive functioning in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), although response heterogeneity limits overall effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient characteristics associated with response and non-response to cognitive training. METHODS: Eighty-two PwMS were randomized into a 7-week attention training (n = 58, age = 48.4 ± 10.2 years) or a waiting-list control group (n = 24, age = 48.5 ± 9.4 years). Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at baseline and post-intervention. Twenty-one healthy controls (HCs, age = 50.27 ± 10.15 years) were included at baseline. Responders were defined with a reliable change index of 1.64 on at least 2/6 cognitive domains. General linear models and logistic regression were applied. RESULTS: Responders (n = 36) and non-responders (n = 22) did not differ on demographics, clinical variables and baseline cognition and structural MRI. However, non-responders exhibited a higher baseline functional connectivity (FC) between the default-mode network (DMN) and the ventral attention network (VAN), compared with responders (p = 0.018) and HCs (p = 0.001). Conversely, responders exhibited no significant baseline differences in FC compared with HCs. Response to cognitive training was predicted by lower DMN-VAN FC (p = 0.004) and DMN-frontoparietal FC (p = 0.029) (Nagelkerke R(2) = 0.25). CONCLUSION: An intact pre-intervention FC is associated with cognitive training responsivity in pwMS, suggesting a window of opportunity for successful cognitive interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9574229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95742292022-10-18 A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity? Prouskas, Stefanos E Schoonheim, Menno M Huiskamp, Marijn Steenwijk, Martijn D Gehring, Karin Barkhof, Frederik de Jong, Brigit A Sitskoorn, Margriet M Geurts, Jeroen JG Hulst, Hanneke E Mult Scler Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: Cognitive training elicits mild-to-moderate improvements in cognitive functioning in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), although response heterogeneity limits overall effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient characteristics associated with response and non-response to cognitive training. METHODS: Eighty-two PwMS were randomized into a 7-week attention training (n = 58, age = 48.4 ± 10.2 years) or a waiting-list control group (n = 24, age = 48.5 ± 9.4 years). Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at baseline and post-intervention. Twenty-one healthy controls (HCs, age = 50.27 ± 10.15 years) were included at baseline. Responders were defined with a reliable change index of 1.64 on at least 2/6 cognitive domains. General linear models and logistic regression were applied. RESULTS: Responders (n = 36) and non-responders (n = 22) did not differ on demographics, clinical variables and baseline cognition and structural MRI. However, non-responders exhibited a higher baseline functional connectivity (FC) between the default-mode network (DMN) and the ventral attention network (VAN), compared with responders (p = 0.018) and HCs (p = 0.001). Conversely, responders exhibited no significant baseline differences in FC compared with HCs. Response to cognitive training was predicted by lower DMN-VAN FC (p = 0.004) and DMN-frontoparietal FC (p = 0.029) (Nagelkerke R(2) = 0.25). CONCLUSION: An intact pre-intervention FC is associated with cognitive training responsivity in pwMS, suggesting a window of opportunity for successful cognitive interventions. SAGE Publications 2022-06-28 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9574229/ /pubmed/35765748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585221103134 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Papers Prouskas, Stefanos E Schoonheim, Menno M Huiskamp, Marijn Steenwijk, Martijn D Gehring, Karin Barkhof, Frederik de Jong, Brigit A Sitskoorn, Margriet M Geurts, Jeroen JG Hulst, Hanneke E A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity? |
title | A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity? |
title_full | A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity? |
title_fullStr | A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity? |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity? |
title_short | A randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Is there a window of opportunity? |
title_sort | randomized trial predicting response to cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: is there a window of opportunity? |
topic | Original Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35765748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585221103134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prouskasstefanose arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT schoonheimmennom arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT huiskampmarijn arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT steenwijkmartijnd arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT gehringkarin arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT barkhoffrederik arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT dejongbrigita arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT sitskoornmargrietm arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT geurtsjeroenjg arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT hulsthannekee arandomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT prouskasstefanose randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT schoonheimmennom randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT huiskampmarijn randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT steenwijkmartijnd randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT gehringkarin randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT barkhoffrederik randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT dejongbrigita randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT sitskoornmargrietm randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT geurtsjeroenjg randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity AT hulsthannekee randomizedtrialpredictingresponsetocognitiverehabilitationinmultiplesclerosisisthereawindowofopportunity |