Cargando…

Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND: Although rarely addressed in the literature, a key question in the care of critically pregnant women with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially at the time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decision, is whether delivery might substantially improve the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aissi James, Sarah, Guervilly, Christophe, Lesouhaitier, Mathieu, Coppens, Alexandre, Haddadi, Clément, Lebreton, Guillaume, Nizard, Jacky, Brechot, Nicolas, Assouline, Benjamin, Saura, Ouriel, Levy, David, Lefèvre, Lucie, Barhoum, Pétra, Chommeloux, Juliette, Hékimian, Guillaume, Luyt, Charles-Edouard, Kimmoun, Antoine, Combes, Alain, Schmidt, Matthieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04189-5
_version_ 1784811183603187712
author Aissi James, Sarah
Guervilly, Christophe
Lesouhaitier, Mathieu
Coppens, Alexandre
Haddadi, Clément
Lebreton, Guillaume
Nizard, Jacky
Brechot, Nicolas
Assouline, Benjamin
Saura, Ouriel
Levy, David
Lefèvre, Lucie
Barhoum, Pétra
Chommeloux, Juliette
Hékimian, Guillaume
Luyt, Charles-Edouard
Kimmoun, Antoine
Combes, Alain
Schmidt, Matthieu
author_facet Aissi James, Sarah
Guervilly, Christophe
Lesouhaitier, Mathieu
Coppens, Alexandre
Haddadi, Clément
Lebreton, Guillaume
Nizard, Jacky
Brechot, Nicolas
Assouline, Benjamin
Saura, Ouriel
Levy, David
Lefèvre, Lucie
Barhoum, Pétra
Chommeloux, Juliette
Hékimian, Guillaume
Luyt, Charles-Edouard
Kimmoun, Antoine
Combes, Alain
Schmidt, Matthieu
author_sort Aissi James, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although rarely addressed in the literature, a key question in the care of critically pregnant women with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially at the time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decision, is whether delivery might substantially improve the mother’s and child’s conditions. This multicenter, retrospective cohort aims to report maternal and fetal short- and long-term outcomes of pregnant women with ECMO-rescued severe ARDS according to the timing of the delivery decision taken before or after ECMO cannulation. METHODS: We included critically ill women with ongoing pregnancy or within 15 days after a maternal/child-rescue-aimed delivery supported by ECMO for a severe ARDS between October 2009 and August 2021 in four ECMO centers. Clinical characteristics, critical care management, complications, and hospital discharge status for both mothers and children were collected. Long-term outcomes and premature birth complications were assessed. RESULTS: Among 563 women on venovenous ECMO during the study period, 11 were cannulated during an ongoing pregnancy at a median (range) of 25 (21–29) gestational weeks, and 13 after an emergency delivery performed at 32 (17–39) weeks of gestation. Pre-ECMO PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio was 57 (26–98) and did not differ between the two groups. Patients on ECMO after delivery reported more major bleeding (46 vs. 18%, p = 0.05) than those with ongoing pregnancy. Overall, the maternal hospital survival was 88%, which was not different between the two groups. Four (36%) of pregnant women had a spontaneous expulsion on ECMO, and fetal survival was higher when ECMO was set after delivery (92% vs. 55%, p = 0.03). Among newborns alive, no severe preterm morbidity or long-term sequelae were reported. CONCLUSION: Continuation of the pregnancy on ECMO support carries a significant risk of fetal death while improving prematurity-related morbidity in alive newborns with no difference in maternal outcomes. Decisions regarding timing, place, and mode of delivery should be taken and regularly (re)assess by a multidisciplinary team in experienced ECMO centers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04189-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9574812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95748122022-10-17 Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study Aissi James, Sarah Guervilly, Christophe Lesouhaitier, Mathieu Coppens, Alexandre Haddadi, Clément Lebreton, Guillaume Nizard, Jacky Brechot, Nicolas Assouline, Benjamin Saura, Ouriel Levy, David Lefèvre, Lucie Barhoum, Pétra Chommeloux, Juliette Hékimian, Guillaume Luyt, Charles-Edouard Kimmoun, Antoine Combes, Alain Schmidt, Matthieu Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Although rarely addressed in the literature, a key question in the care of critically pregnant women with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially at the time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decision, is whether delivery might substantially improve the mother’s and child’s conditions. This multicenter, retrospective cohort aims to report maternal and fetal short- and long-term outcomes of pregnant women with ECMO-rescued severe ARDS according to the timing of the delivery decision taken before or after ECMO cannulation. METHODS: We included critically ill women with ongoing pregnancy or within 15 days after a maternal/child-rescue-aimed delivery supported by ECMO for a severe ARDS between October 2009 and August 2021 in four ECMO centers. Clinical characteristics, critical care management, complications, and hospital discharge status for both mothers and children were collected. Long-term outcomes and premature birth complications were assessed. RESULTS: Among 563 women on venovenous ECMO during the study period, 11 were cannulated during an ongoing pregnancy at a median (range) of 25 (21–29) gestational weeks, and 13 after an emergency delivery performed at 32 (17–39) weeks of gestation. Pre-ECMO PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio was 57 (26–98) and did not differ between the two groups. Patients on ECMO after delivery reported more major bleeding (46 vs. 18%, p = 0.05) than those with ongoing pregnancy. Overall, the maternal hospital survival was 88%, which was not different between the two groups. Four (36%) of pregnant women had a spontaneous expulsion on ECMO, and fetal survival was higher when ECMO was set after delivery (92% vs. 55%, p = 0.03). Among newborns alive, no severe preterm morbidity or long-term sequelae were reported. CONCLUSION: Continuation of the pregnancy on ECMO support carries a significant risk of fetal death while improving prematurity-related morbidity in alive newborns with no difference in maternal outcomes. Decisions regarding timing, place, and mode of delivery should be taken and regularly (re)assess by a multidisciplinary team in experienced ECMO centers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04189-5. BioMed Central 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9574812/ /pubmed/36253839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04189-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Aissi James, Sarah
Guervilly, Christophe
Lesouhaitier, Mathieu
Coppens, Alexandre
Haddadi, Clément
Lebreton, Guillaume
Nizard, Jacky
Brechot, Nicolas
Assouline, Benjamin
Saura, Ouriel
Levy, David
Lefèvre, Lucie
Barhoum, Pétra
Chommeloux, Juliette
Hékimian, Guillaume
Luyt, Charles-Edouard
Kimmoun, Antoine
Combes, Alain
Schmidt, Matthieu
Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study
title Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study
title_full Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study
title_fullStr Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study
title_short Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study
title_sort delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ecmo for severe ards: a retrospective multicenter cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04189-5
work_keys_str_mv AT aissijamessarah deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT guervillychristophe deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT lesouhaitiermathieu deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT coppensalexandre deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT haddadiclement deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT lebretonguillaume deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT nizardjacky deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT brechotnicolas deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT assoulinebenjamin deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT sauraouriel deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT levydavid deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT lefevrelucie deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT barhoumpetra deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT chommelouxjuliette deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT hekimianguillaume deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT luytcharlesedouard deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT kimmounantoine deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT combesalain deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy
AT schmidtmatthieu deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy