Cargando…
Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study
BACKGROUND: Although rarely addressed in the literature, a key question in the care of critically pregnant women with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially at the time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decision, is whether delivery might substantially improve the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04189-5 |
_version_ | 1784811183603187712 |
---|---|
author | Aissi James, Sarah Guervilly, Christophe Lesouhaitier, Mathieu Coppens, Alexandre Haddadi, Clément Lebreton, Guillaume Nizard, Jacky Brechot, Nicolas Assouline, Benjamin Saura, Ouriel Levy, David Lefèvre, Lucie Barhoum, Pétra Chommeloux, Juliette Hékimian, Guillaume Luyt, Charles-Edouard Kimmoun, Antoine Combes, Alain Schmidt, Matthieu |
author_facet | Aissi James, Sarah Guervilly, Christophe Lesouhaitier, Mathieu Coppens, Alexandre Haddadi, Clément Lebreton, Guillaume Nizard, Jacky Brechot, Nicolas Assouline, Benjamin Saura, Ouriel Levy, David Lefèvre, Lucie Barhoum, Pétra Chommeloux, Juliette Hékimian, Guillaume Luyt, Charles-Edouard Kimmoun, Antoine Combes, Alain Schmidt, Matthieu |
author_sort | Aissi James, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although rarely addressed in the literature, a key question in the care of critically pregnant women with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially at the time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decision, is whether delivery might substantially improve the mother’s and child’s conditions. This multicenter, retrospective cohort aims to report maternal and fetal short- and long-term outcomes of pregnant women with ECMO-rescued severe ARDS according to the timing of the delivery decision taken before or after ECMO cannulation. METHODS: We included critically ill women with ongoing pregnancy or within 15 days after a maternal/child-rescue-aimed delivery supported by ECMO for a severe ARDS between October 2009 and August 2021 in four ECMO centers. Clinical characteristics, critical care management, complications, and hospital discharge status for both mothers and children were collected. Long-term outcomes and premature birth complications were assessed. RESULTS: Among 563 women on venovenous ECMO during the study period, 11 were cannulated during an ongoing pregnancy at a median (range) of 25 (21–29) gestational weeks, and 13 after an emergency delivery performed at 32 (17–39) weeks of gestation. Pre-ECMO PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio was 57 (26–98) and did not differ between the two groups. Patients on ECMO after delivery reported more major bleeding (46 vs. 18%, p = 0.05) than those with ongoing pregnancy. Overall, the maternal hospital survival was 88%, which was not different between the two groups. Four (36%) of pregnant women had a spontaneous expulsion on ECMO, and fetal survival was higher when ECMO was set after delivery (92% vs. 55%, p = 0.03). Among newborns alive, no severe preterm morbidity or long-term sequelae were reported. CONCLUSION: Continuation of the pregnancy on ECMO support carries a significant risk of fetal death while improving prematurity-related morbidity in alive newborns with no difference in maternal outcomes. Decisions regarding timing, place, and mode of delivery should be taken and regularly (re)assess by a multidisciplinary team in experienced ECMO centers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04189-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9574812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95748122022-10-17 Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study Aissi James, Sarah Guervilly, Christophe Lesouhaitier, Mathieu Coppens, Alexandre Haddadi, Clément Lebreton, Guillaume Nizard, Jacky Brechot, Nicolas Assouline, Benjamin Saura, Ouriel Levy, David Lefèvre, Lucie Barhoum, Pétra Chommeloux, Juliette Hékimian, Guillaume Luyt, Charles-Edouard Kimmoun, Antoine Combes, Alain Schmidt, Matthieu Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Although rarely addressed in the literature, a key question in the care of critically pregnant women with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially at the time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decision, is whether delivery might substantially improve the mother’s and child’s conditions. This multicenter, retrospective cohort aims to report maternal and fetal short- and long-term outcomes of pregnant women with ECMO-rescued severe ARDS according to the timing of the delivery decision taken before or after ECMO cannulation. METHODS: We included critically ill women with ongoing pregnancy or within 15 days after a maternal/child-rescue-aimed delivery supported by ECMO for a severe ARDS between October 2009 and August 2021 in four ECMO centers. Clinical characteristics, critical care management, complications, and hospital discharge status for both mothers and children were collected. Long-term outcomes and premature birth complications were assessed. RESULTS: Among 563 women on venovenous ECMO during the study period, 11 were cannulated during an ongoing pregnancy at a median (range) of 25 (21–29) gestational weeks, and 13 after an emergency delivery performed at 32 (17–39) weeks of gestation. Pre-ECMO PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio was 57 (26–98) and did not differ between the two groups. Patients on ECMO after delivery reported more major bleeding (46 vs. 18%, p = 0.05) than those with ongoing pregnancy. Overall, the maternal hospital survival was 88%, which was not different between the two groups. Four (36%) of pregnant women had a spontaneous expulsion on ECMO, and fetal survival was higher when ECMO was set after delivery (92% vs. 55%, p = 0.03). Among newborns alive, no severe preterm morbidity or long-term sequelae were reported. CONCLUSION: Continuation of the pregnancy on ECMO support carries a significant risk of fetal death while improving prematurity-related morbidity in alive newborns with no difference in maternal outcomes. Decisions regarding timing, place, and mode of delivery should be taken and regularly (re)assess by a multidisciplinary team in experienced ECMO centers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04189-5. BioMed Central 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9574812/ /pubmed/36253839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04189-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Aissi James, Sarah Guervilly, Christophe Lesouhaitier, Mathieu Coppens, Alexandre Haddadi, Clément Lebreton, Guillaume Nizard, Jacky Brechot, Nicolas Assouline, Benjamin Saura, Ouriel Levy, David Lefèvre, Lucie Barhoum, Pétra Chommeloux, Juliette Hékimian, Guillaume Luyt, Charles-Edouard Kimmoun, Antoine Combes, Alain Schmidt, Matthieu Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study |
title | Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study |
title_full | Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study |
title_fullStr | Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study |
title_short | Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study |
title_sort | delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ecmo for severe ards: a retrospective multicenter cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9574812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04189-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aissijamessarah deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT guervillychristophe deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT lesouhaitiermathieu deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT coppensalexandre deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT haddadiclement deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT lebretonguillaume deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT nizardjacky deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT brechotnicolas deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT assoulinebenjamin deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT sauraouriel deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT levydavid deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT lefevrelucie deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT barhoumpetra deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT chommelouxjuliette deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT hekimianguillaume deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT luytcharlesedouard deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT kimmounantoine deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT combesalain deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy AT schmidtmatthieu deliverydecisioninpregnantwomenrescuedbyecmoforsevereardsaretrospectivemulticentercohortstudy |