Cargando…

Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and spread of variable volumes of local anesthetics (LA) in Erector spinae plane block (ESPB). METHODS: Sixty patients aged between 18 and 50 years with an ASA I-II and scheduled for breast cancer surgery were randomized to receive either ESPB with 20 m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdella, Ahmed Mohamed Mohamed Rabah, Arida, Emad Eldin Abd El Monem, Megahed, Nagwa Ahmed, El-Amrawy, Wessam Zakaria, Mohamed, Walid Mohamed Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01860-w
_version_ 1784811274184425472
author Abdella, Ahmed Mohamed Mohamed Rabah
Arida, Emad Eldin Abd El Monem
Megahed, Nagwa Ahmed
El-Amrawy, Wessam Zakaria
Mohamed, Walid Mohamed Ahmed
author_facet Abdella, Ahmed Mohamed Mohamed Rabah
Arida, Emad Eldin Abd El Monem
Megahed, Nagwa Ahmed
El-Amrawy, Wessam Zakaria
Mohamed, Walid Mohamed Ahmed
author_sort Abdella, Ahmed Mohamed Mohamed Rabah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and spread of variable volumes of local anesthetics (LA) in Erector spinae plane block (ESPB). METHODS: Sixty patients aged between 18 and 50 years with an ASA I-II and scheduled for breast cancer surgery were randomized to receive either ESPB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine (Standard volume ESPB), or with 40 ml 0.125% bupivacaine (High volume ESPB), or no ESPB (GA only group). The primary outcome was pain intensity evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS), 12 hours after surgery. P-values < 0.05 were considered the cutoff point for statistical significance. The secondary outcomes were pain at rest and pain on movement evaluated by the VAS, craniocaudal injectate spread, to paravertebral (PV) and epidural spaces assessed by CT, clinical dermatomal spread, level of sedation or agitation, and patient satisfaction with anesthesia and analgesia. RESULTS: VAS at rest 12 h after surgery was less in both intervention groups compared to the control (1.75 ± 0.79 vs. 1.6 ± 0.88 vs. 3.4 ± 1.96, p = 0.001). The LA had extended further in the high volume group than the standard volume group (11.20 ± 3.07 vs. 9.15 ± 2.54 vertebral levels, p = 0.027). No difference of the spread to PV or epidural spaces between the 2 intervention groups. More dermatomes were covered in the high volume group (7.20 ± 2.12 vs. 5.75 ± 1.37 dermatomes, p = 0.014). Agitation was higher in the GA only group than both ESPB groups in the first 8 postoperative hours. Patients were more satisfied in both ESPB groups than the GA only group. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ESPB is an excellent analgesic modality and it can also attenuate both postoperative agitation and sedation. Doubling the injectate volume enhances the craniocaudal spreading and may be useful for surgeries requiring multiple dermatomes. However, larger volume has no effect on analgesic efficacy or patient satisfaction as there is no further spread to the PV, epidural spaces or spinal nerve rami. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04796363 (12/3/2021).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9575234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95752342022-10-18 Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial Abdella, Ahmed Mohamed Mohamed Rabah Arida, Emad Eldin Abd El Monem Megahed, Nagwa Ahmed El-Amrawy, Wessam Zakaria Mohamed, Walid Mohamed Ahmed BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and spread of variable volumes of local anesthetics (LA) in Erector spinae plane block (ESPB). METHODS: Sixty patients aged between 18 and 50 years with an ASA I-II and scheduled for breast cancer surgery were randomized to receive either ESPB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine (Standard volume ESPB), or with 40 ml 0.125% bupivacaine (High volume ESPB), or no ESPB (GA only group). The primary outcome was pain intensity evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS), 12 hours after surgery. P-values < 0.05 were considered the cutoff point for statistical significance. The secondary outcomes were pain at rest and pain on movement evaluated by the VAS, craniocaudal injectate spread, to paravertebral (PV) and epidural spaces assessed by CT, clinical dermatomal spread, level of sedation or agitation, and patient satisfaction with anesthesia and analgesia. RESULTS: VAS at rest 12 h after surgery was less in both intervention groups compared to the control (1.75 ± 0.79 vs. 1.6 ± 0.88 vs. 3.4 ± 1.96, p = 0.001). The LA had extended further in the high volume group than the standard volume group (11.20 ± 3.07 vs. 9.15 ± 2.54 vertebral levels, p = 0.027). No difference of the spread to PV or epidural spaces between the 2 intervention groups. More dermatomes were covered in the high volume group (7.20 ± 2.12 vs. 5.75 ± 1.37 dermatomes, p = 0.014). Agitation was higher in the GA only group than both ESPB groups in the first 8 postoperative hours. Patients were more satisfied in both ESPB groups than the GA only group. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ESPB is an excellent analgesic modality and it can also attenuate both postoperative agitation and sedation. Doubling the injectate volume enhances the craniocaudal spreading and may be useful for surgeries requiring multiple dermatomes. However, larger volume has no effect on analgesic efficacy or patient satisfaction as there is no further spread to the PV, epidural spaces or spinal nerve rami. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04796363 (12/3/2021). BioMed Central 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9575234/ /pubmed/36253729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01860-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Abdella, Ahmed Mohamed Mohamed Rabah
Arida, Emad Eldin Abd El Monem
Megahed, Nagwa Ahmed
El-Amrawy, Wessam Zakaria
Mohamed, Walid Mohamed Ahmed
Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial
title Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01860-w
work_keys_str_mv AT abdellaahmedmohamedmohamedrabah analgesiaandspreadoferectorspinaeplaneblockinbreastcancersurgeriesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aridaemadeldinabdelmonem analgesiaandspreadoferectorspinaeplaneblockinbreastcancersurgeriesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT megahednagwaahmed analgesiaandspreadoferectorspinaeplaneblockinbreastcancersurgeriesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elamrawywessamzakaria analgesiaandspreadoferectorspinaeplaneblockinbreastcancersurgeriesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohamedwalidmohamedahmed analgesiaandspreadoferectorspinaeplaneblockinbreastcancersurgeriesarandomizedcontrolledtrial