Cargando…

Attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees

OBJECTIVES: There is scant research about laboratory monitoring in people taking conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) for rheumatic disease. Our objective was to conduct a scoping study to assess the range of current attitudes and the variation in practice of labo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsakas, James J., Liew, David F. L., Adams, Cameron L., Hill, Catherine L., Proudman, Susanna, Whittle, Samuel, Buchbinder, Rachelle, Robinson, Philip C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36244979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00290-y
_version_ 1784811280431841280
author Tsakas, James J.
Liew, David F. L.
Adams, Cameron L.
Hill, Catherine L.
Proudman, Susanna
Whittle, Samuel
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Robinson, Philip C.
author_facet Tsakas, James J.
Liew, David F. L.
Adams, Cameron L.
Hill, Catherine L.
Proudman, Susanna
Whittle, Samuel
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Robinson, Philip C.
author_sort Tsakas, James J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: There is scant research about laboratory monitoring in people taking conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) for rheumatic disease. Our objective was to conduct a scoping study to assess the range of current attitudes and the variation in practice of laboratory monitoring of csDMARDs by rheumatologists and trainees. METHODS: Australian and overseas rheumatologists or trainees were invited through newsletter, Twitter and personal e-mail, to complete an anonymous online survey between 1 February and 22 March 2021. Questions focused on laboratory tests requested by csDMARD prescribed, frequency/pattern of monitoring, influence of additional factors and combination therapy, actions in response to abnormal tests, and attitudes to monitoring frequencies. Results were presented descriptively and analysed using linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 221 valid responses. Most respondents were from Australia (n = 53, 35%) followed by the US (n = 39, 26%), with a slight preponderance of women (n = 84, 56%), ≥ 11 years in rheumatology practice (n = 83, 56%) and in mostly public practice (n = 79, 53%). Respondents had a wide variation in the frequency and scheduling of tests. In general, respondents reported increasing monitoring frequency if patients had numerous comorbidities or if both methotrexate and leflunomide were being taken concurrently. There was a wide variety of responses to abnormal monitoring results and 27 (40%) considered that in general, monitoring tests are performed too frequently. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated a wide variation in the frequency of testing, factors that should influence this, and what responses to abnormal test results are appropriate, indicates a likely lack of evidence and the need to define the risks, benefits and costs of different csDMARD monitoring regimens. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00290-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9575262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95752622022-10-18 Attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees Tsakas, James J. Liew, David F. L. Adams, Cameron L. Hill, Catherine L. Proudman, Susanna Whittle, Samuel Buchbinder, Rachelle Robinson, Philip C. BMC Rheumatol Research OBJECTIVES: There is scant research about laboratory monitoring in people taking conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) for rheumatic disease. Our objective was to conduct a scoping study to assess the range of current attitudes and the variation in practice of laboratory monitoring of csDMARDs by rheumatologists and trainees. METHODS: Australian and overseas rheumatologists or trainees were invited through newsletter, Twitter and personal e-mail, to complete an anonymous online survey between 1 February and 22 March 2021. Questions focused on laboratory tests requested by csDMARD prescribed, frequency/pattern of monitoring, influence of additional factors and combination therapy, actions in response to abnormal tests, and attitudes to monitoring frequencies. Results were presented descriptively and analysed using linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 221 valid responses. Most respondents were from Australia (n = 53, 35%) followed by the US (n = 39, 26%), with a slight preponderance of women (n = 84, 56%), ≥ 11 years in rheumatology practice (n = 83, 56%) and in mostly public practice (n = 79, 53%). Respondents had a wide variation in the frequency and scheduling of tests. In general, respondents reported increasing monitoring frequency if patients had numerous comorbidities or if both methotrexate and leflunomide were being taken concurrently. There was a wide variety of responses to abnormal monitoring results and 27 (40%) considered that in general, monitoring tests are performed too frequently. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated a wide variation in the frequency of testing, factors that should influence this, and what responses to abnormal test results are appropriate, indicates a likely lack of evidence and the need to define the risks, benefits and costs of different csDMARD monitoring regimens. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00290-y. BioMed Central 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9575262/ /pubmed/36244979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00290-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tsakas, James J.
Liew, David F. L.
Adams, Cameron L.
Hill, Catherine L.
Proudman, Susanna
Whittle, Samuel
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Robinson, Philip C.
Attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees
title Attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees
title_full Attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees
title_fullStr Attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees
title_short Attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees
title_sort attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36244979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00290-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tsakasjamesj attitudesandpracticesinthelaboratorymonitoringofconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsbyrheumatologistsandrheumatologytrainees
AT liewdavidfl attitudesandpracticesinthelaboratorymonitoringofconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsbyrheumatologistsandrheumatologytrainees
AT adamscameronl attitudesandpracticesinthelaboratorymonitoringofconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsbyrheumatologistsandrheumatologytrainees
AT hillcatherinel attitudesandpracticesinthelaboratorymonitoringofconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsbyrheumatologistsandrheumatologytrainees
AT proudmansusanna attitudesandpracticesinthelaboratorymonitoringofconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsbyrheumatologistsandrheumatologytrainees
AT whittlesamuel attitudesandpracticesinthelaboratorymonitoringofconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsbyrheumatologistsandrheumatologytrainees
AT buchbinderrachelle attitudesandpracticesinthelaboratorymonitoringofconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsbyrheumatologistsandrheumatologytrainees
AT robinsonphilipc attitudesandpracticesinthelaboratorymonitoringofconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsbyrheumatologistsandrheumatologytrainees