Cargando…

Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices

BACKGROUND: Grip strength has been identified as an important indicator of health status and predictor of clinical outcomes. The gold standard for measuring grip strength is the JAMAR® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer. Less expensive dynamometers are available but have not been validated within a hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lupton-Smith, Alison, Fourie, Kyla, Mazinyo, Anele, Mokone, Molebogeng, Nxaba, Siwelile, Morrow, Brenda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262213
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1768
_version_ 1784811302284165120
author Lupton-Smith, Alison
Fourie, Kyla
Mazinyo, Anele
Mokone, Molebogeng
Nxaba, Siwelile
Morrow, Brenda
author_facet Lupton-Smith, Alison
Fourie, Kyla
Mazinyo, Anele
Mokone, Molebogeng
Nxaba, Siwelile
Morrow, Brenda
author_sort Lupton-Smith, Alison
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Grip strength has been identified as an important indicator of health status and predictor of clinical outcomes. The gold standard for measuring grip strength is the JAMAR® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer. Less expensive dynamometers are available but have not been validated within a hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: To validate the Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer (Model EH101) against the validated JAMAR® Dynamometer (Model J00105) in a hospital population. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study with a randomised single-blind cross-over component was conducted on consenting adult patients admitted to general hospital wards. The best of three measurements taken using the dominant hand was used for analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-one participants (median [interquartile range] age 42 [30–58] years; n = 27 [52.9%] female) were included. The mean difference between the Jamar® and Camry measurements was 1.9 kg ± 3.6 kg (t-value 0.9; p = 0.4). There was a strong positive correlation between the Jamar® and the Camry devices (R = 0.94; r² = 0.88; p < 0.0001). Excellent agreement was found between Jamar® and Camry measurements (interclass correlational coefficient 0.97, 95% CI 0.94–0.99, p < 0.0001). Hand dominance significantly affected the agreement between devices (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer is a valid tool for assessing grip strength in hospitalised adult patients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer could be used as an inexpensive tool to measure grip strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9575361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95753612022-10-18 Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices Lupton-Smith, Alison Fourie, Kyla Mazinyo, Anele Mokone, Molebogeng Nxaba, Siwelile Morrow, Brenda S Afr J Physiother Original Research BACKGROUND: Grip strength has been identified as an important indicator of health status and predictor of clinical outcomes. The gold standard for measuring grip strength is the JAMAR® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer. Less expensive dynamometers are available but have not been validated within a hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: To validate the Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer (Model EH101) against the validated JAMAR® Dynamometer (Model J00105) in a hospital population. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study with a randomised single-blind cross-over component was conducted on consenting adult patients admitted to general hospital wards. The best of three measurements taken using the dominant hand was used for analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-one participants (median [interquartile range] age 42 [30–58] years; n = 27 [52.9%] female) were included. The mean difference between the Jamar® and Camry measurements was 1.9 kg ± 3.6 kg (t-value 0.9; p = 0.4). There was a strong positive correlation between the Jamar® and the Camry devices (R = 0.94; r² = 0.88; p < 0.0001). Excellent agreement was found between Jamar® and Camry measurements (interclass correlational coefficient 0.97, 95% CI 0.94–0.99, p < 0.0001). Hand dominance significantly affected the agreement between devices (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer is a valid tool for assessing grip strength in hospitalised adult patients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer could be used as an inexpensive tool to measure grip strength. AOSIS 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9575361/ /pubmed/36262213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1768 Text en © 2022. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lupton-Smith, Alison
Fourie, Kyla
Mazinyo, Anele
Mokone, Molebogeng
Nxaba, Siwelile
Morrow, Brenda
Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices
title Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices
title_full Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices
title_fullStr Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices
title_short Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices
title_sort measurement of hand grip strength: a cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262213
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1768
work_keys_str_mv AT luptonsmithalison measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices
AT fouriekyla measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices
AT mazinyoanele measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices
AT mokonemolebogeng measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices
AT nxabasiwelile measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices
AT morrowbrenda measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices