Cargando…
Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices
BACKGROUND: Grip strength has been identified as an important indicator of health status and predictor of clinical outcomes. The gold standard for measuring grip strength is the JAMAR® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer. Less expensive dynamometers are available but have not been validated within a hospital...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1768 |
_version_ | 1784811302284165120 |
---|---|
author | Lupton-Smith, Alison Fourie, Kyla Mazinyo, Anele Mokone, Molebogeng Nxaba, Siwelile Morrow, Brenda |
author_facet | Lupton-Smith, Alison Fourie, Kyla Mazinyo, Anele Mokone, Molebogeng Nxaba, Siwelile Morrow, Brenda |
author_sort | Lupton-Smith, Alison |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Grip strength has been identified as an important indicator of health status and predictor of clinical outcomes. The gold standard for measuring grip strength is the JAMAR® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer. Less expensive dynamometers are available but have not been validated within a hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: To validate the Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer (Model EH101) against the validated JAMAR® Dynamometer (Model J00105) in a hospital population. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study with a randomised single-blind cross-over component was conducted on consenting adult patients admitted to general hospital wards. The best of three measurements taken using the dominant hand was used for analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-one participants (median [interquartile range] age 42 [30–58] years; n = 27 [52.9%] female) were included. The mean difference between the Jamar® and Camry measurements was 1.9 kg ± 3.6 kg (t-value 0.9; p = 0.4). There was a strong positive correlation between the Jamar® and the Camry devices (R = 0.94; r² = 0.88; p < 0.0001). Excellent agreement was found between Jamar® and Camry measurements (interclass correlational coefficient 0.97, 95% CI 0.94–0.99, p < 0.0001). Hand dominance significantly affected the agreement between devices (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer is a valid tool for assessing grip strength in hospitalised adult patients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer could be used as an inexpensive tool to measure grip strength. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9575361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95753612022-10-18 Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices Lupton-Smith, Alison Fourie, Kyla Mazinyo, Anele Mokone, Molebogeng Nxaba, Siwelile Morrow, Brenda S Afr J Physiother Original Research BACKGROUND: Grip strength has been identified as an important indicator of health status and predictor of clinical outcomes. The gold standard for measuring grip strength is the JAMAR® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer. Less expensive dynamometers are available but have not been validated within a hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: To validate the Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer (Model EH101) against the validated JAMAR® Dynamometer (Model J00105) in a hospital population. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study with a randomised single-blind cross-over component was conducted on consenting adult patients admitted to general hospital wards. The best of three measurements taken using the dominant hand was used for analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-one participants (median [interquartile range] age 42 [30–58] years; n = 27 [52.9%] female) were included. The mean difference between the Jamar® and Camry measurements was 1.9 kg ± 3.6 kg (t-value 0.9; p = 0.4). There was a strong positive correlation between the Jamar® and the Camry devices (R = 0.94; r² = 0.88; p < 0.0001). Excellent agreement was found between Jamar® and Camry measurements (interclass correlational coefficient 0.97, 95% CI 0.94–0.99, p < 0.0001). Hand dominance significantly affected the agreement between devices (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer is a valid tool for assessing grip strength in hospitalised adult patients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The Camry Digital Handgrip Dynamometer could be used as an inexpensive tool to measure grip strength. AOSIS 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9575361/ /pubmed/36262213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1768 Text en © 2022. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lupton-Smith, Alison Fourie, Kyla Mazinyo, Anele Mokone, Molebogeng Nxaba, Siwelile Morrow, Brenda Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices |
title | Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices |
title_full | Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices |
title_fullStr | Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices |
title_short | Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices |
title_sort | measurement of hand grip strength: a cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1768 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luptonsmithalison measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices AT fouriekyla measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices AT mazinyoanele measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices AT mokonemolebogeng measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices AT nxabasiwelile measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices AT morrowbrenda measurementofhandgripstrengthacrosssectionalstudyoftwodynamometrydevices |