Cargando…
Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery
BACKGROUND: The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and reconstructed graft has direct implications on its strength and knee function. Little is known regarding how the CSA changes along the ligament length and how those changes vary between treated and native ligament...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221127326 |
_version_ | 1784811315706986496 |
---|---|
author | Menghini, Danilo Kaushal, Shankar G. Flannery, Sean W. Ecklund, Kirsten Murray, Martha M. Fleming, Braden C. Kiapour, Ata M. Proffen, Benedikt Sant, Nicholas Portilla, Gabriela Sanborn, Ryan Freiberger, Christina Henderson, Rachael Barnett, Samuel Yen, Yi-Meng Kramer, Dennis E. Micheli, Lyle J. |
author_facet | Menghini, Danilo Kaushal, Shankar G. Flannery, Sean W. Ecklund, Kirsten Murray, Martha M. Fleming, Braden C. Kiapour, Ata M. Proffen, Benedikt Sant, Nicholas Portilla, Gabriela Sanborn, Ryan Freiberger, Christina Henderson, Rachael Barnett, Samuel Yen, Yi-Meng Kramer, Dennis E. Micheli, Lyle J. |
author_sort | Menghini, Danilo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and reconstructed graft has direct implications on its strength and knee function. Little is known regarding how the CSA changes along the ligament length and how those changes vary between treated and native ligaments over time. HYPOTHESIS: It was hypothesized that (1) the CSA of reconstructed ACLs and restored ACLs via bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) is heterogeneous along the length. (2) Differences in CSA between treated and native ACLs decrease over time. (3) CSA of the surgically treated ACLs is correlated significantly with body size (ie, height, weight, body mass index) and knee size (ie, bicondylar and notch width). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging scans of treated and contralateral knees of 98 patients (n = 33 ACL reconstruction, 65 BEAR) at 6, 12, and 24 months post-operation were used to measure the ligament CSA at 1% increments along the ACL length (tibial insertion, 0%; femoral insertion, 100%). Statistical parametric mapping was used to evaluate the differences in CSA between 6 and 24 months. Correlations between body and knee size and treated ligament CSA along its length were also assessed. RESULTS: Hamstring autografts had larger CSAs than native ACLs at all time points (P < .001), with region of difference decreasing from proximal 95% of length (6 months) to proximal 77% of length (24 months). Restored ACLs had larger CSAs than native ACLs at 6 and 12 months, with larger than native CSA only along a small midsubstance region at 24 months (P < .001). Graft CSA was correlated significantly with weight (6 and 12 months), bicondylar width (all time points), and notch width (24 months). Restored ACL CSA was significantly correlated with bicondylar width (6 months) and notch width (6 and 12 months). CONCLUSION: Surgically treated ACLs remodel continuously within the first 2 years after surgery, leading to ligaments/grafts with heterogeneous CSAs along the length, similar to the native ACL. While reconstructed ACLs remained significantly larger, the restored ACL had a CSA profile comparable with that of the contralateral native ACL. In addition to size and morphology differences, there were fundamental differences in factors contributing to CSA profile between the ACL reconstruction and BEAR procedures. REGISTRATION: NCT 02664545 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9575446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95754462022-10-18 Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery Menghini, Danilo Kaushal, Shankar G. Flannery, Sean W. Ecklund, Kirsten Murray, Martha M. Fleming, Braden C. Kiapour, Ata M. Proffen, Benedikt Sant, Nicholas Portilla, Gabriela Sanborn, Ryan Freiberger, Christina Henderson, Rachael Barnett, Samuel Yen, Yi-Meng Kramer, Dennis E. Micheli, Lyle J. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and reconstructed graft has direct implications on its strength and knee function. Little is known regarding how the CSA changes along the ligament length and how those changes vary between treated and native ligaments over time. HYPOTHESIS: It was hypothesized that (1) the CSA of reconstructed ACLs and restored ACLs via bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) is heterogeneous along the length. (2) Differences in CSA between treated and native ACLs decrease over time. (3) CSA of the surgically treated ACLs is correlated significantly with body size (ie, height, weight, body mass index) and knee size (ie, bicondylar and notch width). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging scans of treated and contralateral knees of 98 patients (n = 33 ACL reconstruction, 65 BEAR) at 6, 12, and 24 months post-operation were used to measure the ligament CSA at 1% increments along the ACL length (tibial insertion, 0%; femoral insertion, 100%). Statistical parametric mapping was used to evaluate the differences in CSA between 6 and 24 months. Correlations between body and knee size and treated ligament CSA along its length were also assessed. RESULTS: Hamstring autografts had larger CSAs than native ACLs at all time points (P < .001), with region of difference decreasing from proximal 95% of length (6 months) to proximal 77% of length (24 months). Restored ACLs had larger CSAs than native ACLs at 6 and 12 months, with larger than native CSA only along a small midsubstance region at 24 months (P < .001). Graft CSA was correlated significantly with weight (6 and 12 months), bicondylar width (all time points), and notch width (24 months). Restored ACL CSA was significantly correlated with bicondylar width (6 months) and notch width (6 and 12 months). CONCLUSION: Surgically treated ACLs remodel continuously within the first 2 years after surgery, leading to ligaments/grafts with heterogeneous CSAs along the length, similar to the native ACL. While reconstructed ACLs remained significantly larger, the restored ACL had a CSA profile comparable with that of the contralateral native ACL. In addition to size and morphology differences, there were fundamental differences in factors contributing to CSA profile between the ACL reconstruction and BEAR procedures. REGISTRATION: NCT 02664545 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier). SAGE Publications 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9575446/ /pubmed/36263311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221127326 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Menghini, Danilo Kaushal, Shankar G. Flannery, Sean W. Ecklund, Kirsten Murray, Martha M. Fleming, Braden C. Kiapour, Ata M. Proffen, Benedikt Sant, Nicholas Portilla, Gabriela Sanborn, Ryan Freiberger, Christina Henderson, Rachael Barnett, Samuel Yen, Yi-Meng Kramer, Dennis E. Micheli, Lyle J. Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery |
title | Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate
Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery |
title_full | Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate
Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery |
title_fullStr | Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate
Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate
Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery |
title_short | Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate
Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery |
title_sort | changes in the cross-sectional profile of treated anterior cruciate
ligament within 2 years after surgery |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221127326 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menghinidanilo changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT kaushalshankarg changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT flanneryseanw changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT ecklundkirsten changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT murraymartham changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT flemingbradenc changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT kiapouratam changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT proffenbenedikt changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT santnicholas changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT portillagabriela changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT sanbornryan changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT freibergerchristina changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT hendersonrachael changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT barnettsamuel changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT yenyimeng changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT kramerdennise changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery AT michelilylej changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery |