Cargando…

Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery

BACKGROUND: The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and reconstructed graft has direct implications on its strength and knee function. Little is known regarding how the CSA changes along the ligament length and how those changes vary between treated and native ligament...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menghini, Danilo, Kaushal, Shankar G., Flannery, Sean W., Ecklund, Kirsten, Murray, Martha M., Fleming, Braden C., Kiapour, Ata M., Proffen, Benedikt, Sant, Nicholas, Portilla, Gabriela, Sanborn, Ryan, Freiberger, Christina, Henderson, Rachael, Barnett, Samuel, Yen, Yi-Meng, Kramer, Dennis E., Micheli, Lyle J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221127326
_version_ 1784811315706986496
author Menghini, Danilo
Kaushal, Shankar G.
Flannery, Sean W.
Ecklund, Kirsten
Murray, Martha M.
Fleming, Braden C.
Kiapour, Ata M.
Proffen, Benedikt
Sant, Nicholas
Portilla, Gabriela
Sanborn, Ryan
Freiberger, Christina
Henderson, Rachael
Barnett, Samuel
Yen, Yi-Meng
Kramer, Dennis E.
Micheli, Lyle J.
author_facet Menghini, Danilo
Kaushal, Shankar G.
Flannery, Sean W.
Ecklund, Kirsten
Murray, Martha M.
Fleming, Braden C.
Kiapour, Ata M.
Proffen, Benedikt
Sant, Nicholas
Portilla, Gabriela
Sanborn, Ryan
Freiberger, Christina
Henderson, Rachael
Barnett, Samuel
Yen, Yi-Meng
Kramer, Dennis E.
Micheli, Lyle J.
author_sort Menghini, Danilo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and reconstructed graft has direct implications on its strength and knee function. Little is known regarding how the CSA changes along the ligament length and how those changes vary between treated and native ligaments over time. HYPOTHESIS: It was hypothesized that (1) the CSA of reconstructed ACLs and restored ACLs via bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) is heterogeneous along the length. (2) Differences in CSA between treated and native ACLs decrease over time. (3) CSA of the surgically treated ACLs is correlated significantly with body size (ie, height, weight, body mass index) and knee size (ie, bicondylar and notch width). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging scans of treated and contralateral knees of 98 patients (n = 33 ACL reconstruction, 65 BEAR) at 6, 12, and 24 months post-operation were used to measure the ligament CSA at 1% increments along the ACL length (tibial insertion, 0%; femoral insertion, 100%). Statistical parametric mapping was used to evaluate the differences in CSA between 6 and 24 months. Correlations between body and knee size and treated ligament CSA along its length were also assessed. RESULTS: Hamstring autografts had larger CSAs than native ACLs at all time points (P < .001), with region of difference decreasing from proximal 95% of length (6 months) to proximal 77% of length (24 months). Restored ACLs had larger CSAs than native ACLs at 6 and 12 months, with larger than native CSA only along a small midsubstance region at 24 months (P < .001). Graft CSA was correlated significantly with weight (6 and 12 months), bicondylar width (all time points), and notch width (24 months). Restored ACL CSA was significantly correlated with bicondylar width (6 months) and notch width (6 and 12 months). CONCLUSION: Surgically treated ACLs remodel continuously within the first 2 years after surgery, leading to ligaments/grafts with heterogeneous CSAs along the length, similar to the native ACL. While reconstructed ACLs remained significantly larger, the restored ACL had a CSA profile comparable with that of the contralateral native ACL. In addition to size and morphology differences, there were fundamental differences in factors contributing to CSA profile between the ACL reconstruction and BEAR procedures. REGISTRATION: NCT 02664545 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9575446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95754462022-10-18 Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery Menghini, Danilo Kaushal, Shankar G. Flannery, Sean W. Ecklund, Kirsten Murray, Martha M. Fleming, Braden C. Kiapour, Ata M. Proffen, Benedikt Sant, Nicholas Portilla, Gabriela Sanborn, Ryan Freiberger, Christina Henderson, Rachael Barnett, Samuel Yen, Yi-Meng Kramer, Dennis E. Micheli, Lyle J. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and reconstructed graft has direct implications on its strength and knee function. Little is known regarding how the CSA changes along the ligament length and how those changes vary between treated and native ligaments over time. HYPOTHESIS: It was hypothesized that (1) the CSA of reconstructed ACLs and restored ACLs via bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) is heterogeneous along the length. (2) Differences in CSA between treated and native ACLs decrease over time. (3) CSA of the surgically treated ACLs is correlated significantly with body size (ie, height, weight, body mass index) and knee size (ie, bicondylar and notch width). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging scans of treated and contralateral knees of 98 patients (n = 33 ACL reconstruction, 65 BEAR) at 6, 12, and 24 months post-operation were used to measure the ligament CSA at 1% increments along the ACL length (tibial insertion, 0%; femoral insertion, 100%). Statistical parametric mapping was used to evaluate the differences in CSA between 6 and 24 months. Correlations between body and knee size and treated ligament CSA along its length were also assessed. RESULTS: Hamstring autografts had larger CSAs than native ACLs at all time points (P < .001), with region of difference decreasing from proximal 95% of length (6 months) to proximal 77% of length (24 months). Restored ACLs had larger CSAs than native ACLs at 6 and 12 months, with larger than native CSA only along a small midsubstance region at 24 months (P < .001). Graft CSA was correlated significantly with weight (6 and 12 months), bicondylar width (all time points), and notch width (24 months). Restored ACL CSA was significantly correlated with bicondylar width (6 months) and notch width (6 and 12 months). CONCLUSION: Surgically treated ACLs remodel continuously within the first 2 years after surgery, leading to ligaments/grafts with heterogeneous CSAs along the length, similar to the native ACL. While reconstructed ACLs remained significantly larger, the restored ACL had a CSA profile comparable with that of the contralateral native ACL. In addition to size and morphology differences, there were fundamental differences in factors contributing to CSA profile between the ACL reconstruction and BEAR procedures. REGISTRATION: NCT 02664545 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier). SAGE Publications 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9575446/ /pubmed/36263311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221127326 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Menghini, Danilo
Kaushal, Shankar G.
Flannery, Sean W.
Ecklund, Kirsten
Murray, Martha M.
Fleming, Braden C.
Kiapour, Ata M.
Proffen, Benedikt
Sant, Nicholas
Portilla, Gabriela
Sanborn, Ryan
Freiberger, Christina
Henderson, Rachael
Barnett, Samuel
Yen, Yi-Meng
Kramer, Dennis E.
Micheli, Lyle J.
Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery
title Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery
title_full Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery
title_fullStr Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery
title_short Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery
title_sort changes in the cross-sectional profile of treated anterior cruciate ligament within 2 years after surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36263311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221127326
work_keys_str_mv AT menghinidanilo changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT kaushalshankarg changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT flanneryseanw changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT ecklundkirsten changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT murraymartham changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT flemingbradenc changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT kiapouratam changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT proffenbenedikt changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT santnicholas changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT portillagabriela changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT sanbornryan changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT freibergerchristina changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT hendersonrachael changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT barnettsamuel changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT yenyimeng changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT kramerdennise changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery
AT michelilylej changesinthecrosssectionalprofileoftreatedanteriorcruciateligamentwithin2yearsaftersurgery