Cargando…

How is Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Predictive of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients?

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant stroke risk factor. Further research is needed to clarify whether higher atrial fibrillation burden (AFB) link to the elevated risk of ischemic embolism, and how AF burden could combine with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score to improve the anticoagulation s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhuo, Xiuping, Huang, Meinv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7619669
_version_ 1784811528158969856
author Zhuo, Xiuping
Huang, Meinv
author_facet Zhuo, Xiuping
Huang, Meinv
author_sort Zhuo, Xiuping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant stroke risk factor. Further research is needed to clarify whether higher atrial fibrillation burden (AFB) link to the elevated risk of ischemic embolism, and how AF burden could combine with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score to improve the anticoagulation strategy. We aim to evaluate if the AF burden characterized using 24-hours Holter ECG monitoring is associated with the risk of ischemic stroke. METHODS: This cohort study enrolled 210 Holter ECG monitoring detected atrial fibrillation patients. The burden of atrial fibrillation was defined as the percentage of time in atrial fibrillation during the monitoring period, and the AF burden and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score were compared between patients with and without thromboembolic outcomes. Multivariate regressions were conducted to estimate the predictors of thromboembolic outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen thromboembolic events occurred within a median follow-up of 11.39 months. Patients with ischemic stroke had higher CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores but not higher AF burden. After adjusting for age, hypertension, diabetes, anticoagulation, antithrombotic therapy, AF burden, and AF with higher CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was associated with increased risk for ischemic stroke (hazard ratio (HR), 15.17). CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score > 4.5 was a predictor of significantly higher risk of future stroke (AUC 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: In Holter ECG monitoring detected AF, AF burden does not significantly impact the subsequent risk of stroke; whereas, CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scoring is still a robust predictor of stroke risk. This may illustrate that once AF is detected from Holter ECG monitoring, underlying risk factors appear to be more predictive of subsequent stroke risk than atrial fibrillation burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9576441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95764412022-10-18 How is Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Predictive of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients? Zhuo, Xiuping Huang, Meinv Cardiol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant stroke risk factor. Further research is needed to clarify whether higher atrial fibrillation burden (AFB) link to the elevated risk of ischemic embolism, and how AF burden could combine with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score to improve the anticoagulation strategy. We aim to evaluate if the AF burden characterized using 24-hours Holter ECG monitoring is associated with the risk of ischemic stroke. METHODS: This cohort study enrolled 210 Holter ECG monitoring detected atrial fibrillation patients. The burden of atrial fibrillation was defined as the percentage of time in atrial fibrillation during the monitoring period, and the AF burden and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score were compared between patients with and without thromboembolic outcomes. Multivariate regressions were conducted to estimate the predictors of thromboembolic outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen thromboembolic events occurred within a median follow-up of 11.39 months. Patients with ischemic stroke had higher CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores but not higher AF burden. After adjusting for age, hypertension, diabetes, anticoagulation, antithrombotic therapy, AF burden, and AF with higher CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was associated with increased risk for ischemic stroke (hazard ratio (HR), 15.17). CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score > 4.5 was a predictor of significantly higher risk of future stroke (AUC 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: In Holter ECG monitoring detected AF, AF burden does not significantly impact the subsequent risk of stroke; whereas, CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scoring is still a robust predictor of stroke risk. This may illustrate that once AF is detected from Holter ECG monitoring, underlying risk factors appear to be more predictive of subsequent stroke risk than atrial fibrillation burden. Hindawi 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9576441/ /pubmed/36262211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7619669 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xiuping Zhuo and Meinv Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhuo, Xiuping
Huang, Meinv
How is Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Predictive of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients?
title How is Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Predictive of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients?
title_full How is Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Predictive of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients?
title_fullStr How is Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Predictive of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients?
title_full_unstemmed How is Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Predictive of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients?
title_short How is Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Predictive of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients?
title_sort how is ambulatory electrocardiogram predictive of stroke in atrial fibrillation patients?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7619669
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuoxiuping howisambulatoryelectrocardiogrampredictiveofstrokeinatrialfibrillationpatients
AT huangmeinv howisambulatoryelectrocardiogrampredictiveofstrokeinatrialfibrillationpatients