Cargando…

The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study

PURPOSE: This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study investigated the influence of posture on lordosis (LL), length of the spinal canal (LSC), anteroposterior diameter (APD L1-L5), dural cross-sectional area (DCSA) of the lumbar spinal canal, and the prevalence of redundant nerve roots (RNR) usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papavero, Luca, Ali, Nawar, Schawjinski, Kathrin, Holtdirk, Annette, Maas, Rainer, Ebert, Stella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36083504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03047-z
_version_ 1784811576550752256
author Papavero, Luca
Ali, Nawar
Schawjinski, Kathrin
Holtdirk, Annette
Maas, Rainer
Ebert, Stella
author_facet Papavero, Luca
Ali, Nawar
Schawjinski, Kathrin
Holtdirk, Annette
Maas, Rainer
Ebert, Stella
author_sort Papavero, Luca
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study investigated the influence of posture on lordosis (LL), length of the spinal canal (LSC), anteroposterior diameter (APD L1-L5), dural cross-sectional area (DCSA) of the lumbar spinal canal, and the prevalence of redundant nerve roots (RNR) using positional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (0.6 T). METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with single-level degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis (cLSS) presenting with RNR in the standing position (STA) were also investigated in supine (SUP) or neutral seated (SIT) and flexed seated (FLEX) positions. Additionally, 45 patients complaining of back pain and without MRI evidence of LSS were evaluated. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Controls (A) and patients with cLSS (B) were comparable in terms of mean age (p = 0.88) and sex (p = 0.22). The progressive transition from STA to FLEX led to a comparable decrease in LL (p = 0.97), an increase in LSC (p = 0.80), and an increase in APD L1-L5 (p = 0.78). The APD of the stenotic level increased disproportionally between the different postures, up to 67% in FLEX compared to 29% in adjacent non-stenotic levels (p < 0.001). Therefore, the prevalence of RNR decreased to 49, 26, and 4% in SUP, SIT, and FLEX, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RNR in standing position was underestimated by half in supine position. Body postures modified LL, LSC, and APD similarly in patients and controls. Stenotic levels compensated for insufficient intraspinal volume with a disproportionate enlargement when switching from the STA to FLEX.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9576640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95766402022-10-19 The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study Papavero, Luca Ali, Nawar Schawjinski, Kathrin Holtdirk, Annette Maas, Rainer Ebert, Stella Neuroradiology Spinal Neuroradiology PURPOSE: This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study investigated the influence of posture on lordosis (LL), length of the spinal canal (LSC), anteroposterior diameter (APD L1-L5), dural cross-sectional area (DCSA) of the lumbar spinal canal, and the prevalence of redundant nerve roots (RNR) using positional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (0.6 T). METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with single-level degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis (cLSS) presenting with RNR in the standing position (STA) were also investigated in supine (SUP) or neutral seated (SIT) and flexed seated (FLEX) positions. Additionally, 45 patients complaining of back pain and without MRI evidence of LSS were evaluated. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Controls (A) and patients with cLSS (B) were comparable in terms of mean age (p = 0.88) and sex (p = 0.22). The progressive transition from STA to FLEX led to a comparable decrease in LL (p = 0.97), an increase in LSC (p = 0.80), and an increase in APD L1-L5 (p = 0.78). The APD of the stenotic level increased disproportionally between the different postures, up to 67% in FLEX compared to 29% in adjacent non-stenotic levels (p < 0.001). Therefore, the prevalence of RNR decreased to 49, 26, and 4% in SUP, SIT, and FLEX, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RNR in standing position was underestimated by half in supine position. Body postures modified LL, LSC, and APD similarly in patients and controls. Stenotic levels compensated for insufficient intraspinal volume with a disproportionate enlargement when switching from the STA to FLEX. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9576640/ /pubmed/36083504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03047-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Spinal Neuroradiology
Papavero, Luca
Ali, Nawar
Schawjinski, Kathrin
Holtdirk, Annette
Maas, Rainer
Ebert, Stella
The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study
title The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study
title_full The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study
title_fullStr The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study
title_short The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study
title_sort prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional mri decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study
topic Spinal Neuroradiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36083504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03047-z
work_keys_str_mv AT papaveroluca theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT alinawar theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT schawjinskikathrin theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT holtdirkannette theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT maasrainer theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT ebertstella theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT papaveroluca prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT alinawar prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT schawjinskikathrin prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT holtdirkannette prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT maasrainer prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT ebertstella prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy