Cargando…
The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study
PURPOSE: This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study investigated the influence of posture on lordosis (LL), length of the spinal canal (LSC), anteroposterior diameter (APD L1-L5), dural cross-sectional area (DCSA) of the lumbar spinal canal, and the prevalence of redundant nerve roots (RNR) usi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36083504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03047-z |
_version_ | 1784811576550752256 |
---|---|
author | Papavero, Luca Ali, Nawar Schawjinski, Kathrin Holtdirk, Annette Maas, Rainer Ebert, Stella |
author_facet | Papavero, Luca Ali, Nawar Schawjinski, Kathrin Holtdirk, Annette Maas, Rainer Ebert, Stella |
author_sort | Papavero, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study investigated the influence of posture on lordosis (LL), length of the spinal canal (LSC), anteroposterior diameter (APD L1-L5), dural cross-sectional area (DCSA) of the lumbar spinal canal, and the prevalence of redundant nerve roots (RNR) using positional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (0.6 T). METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with single-level degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis (cLSS) presenting with RNR in the standing position (STA) were also investigated in supine (SUP) or neutral seated (SIT) and flexed seated (FLEX) positions. Additionally, 45 patients complaining of back pain and without MRI evidence of LSS were evaluated. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Controls (A) and patients with cLSS (B) were comparable in terms of mean age (p = 0.88) and sex (p = 0.22). The progressive transition from STA to FLEX led to a comparable decrease in LL (p = 0.97), an increase in LSC (p = 0.80), and an increase in APD L1-L5 (p = 0.78). The APD of the stenotic level increased disproportionally between the different postures, up to 67% in FLEX compared to 29% in adjacent non-stenotic levels (p < 0.001). Therefore, the prevalence of RNR decreased to 49, 26, and 4% in SUP, SIT, and FLEX, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RNR in standing position was underestimated by half in supine position. Body postures modified LL, LSC, and APD similarly in patients and controls. Stenotic levels compensated for insufficient intraspinal volume with a disproportionate enlargement when switching from the STA to FLEX. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9576640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95766402022-10-19 The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study Papavero, Luca Ali, Nawar Schawjinski, Kathrin Holtdirk, Annette Maas, Rainer Ebert, Stella Neuroradiology Spinal Neuroradiology PURPOSE: This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study investigated the influence of posture on lordosis (LL), length of the spinal canal (LSC), anteroposterior diameter (APD L1-L5), dural cross-sectional area (DCSA) of the lumbar spinal canal, and the prevalence of redundant nerve roots (RNR) using positional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (0.6 T). METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with single-level degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis (cLSS) presenting with RNR in the standing position (STA) were also investigated in supine (SUP) or neutral seated (SIT) and flexed seated (FLEX) positions. Additionally, 45 patients complaining of back pain and without MRI evidence of LSS were evaluated. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Controls (A) and patients with cLSS (B) were comparable in terms of mean age (p = 0.88) and sex (p = 0.22). The progressive transition from STA to FLEX led to a comparable decrease in LL (p = 0.97), an increase in LSC (p = 0.80), and an increase in APD L1-L5 (p = 0.78). The APD of the stenotic level increased disproportionally between the different postures, up to 67% in FLEX compared to 29% in adjacent non-stenotic levels (p < 0.001). Therefore, the prevalence of RNR decreased to 49, 26, and 4% in SUP, SIT, and FLEX, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RNR in standing position was underestimated by half in supine position. Body postures modified LL, LSC, and APD similarly in patients and controls. Stenotic levels compensated for insufficient intraspinal volume with a disproportionate enlargement when switching from the STA to FLEX. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9576640/ /pubmed/36083504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03047-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Spinal Neuroradiology Papavero, Luca Ali, Nawar Schawjinski, Kathrin Holtdirk, Annette Maas, Rainer Ebert, Stella The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study |
title | The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study |
title_full | The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study |
title_fullStr | The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study |
title_short | The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study |
title_sort | prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional mri decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study |
topic | Spinal Neuroradiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36083504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03047-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papaveroluca theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy AT alinawar theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy AT schawjinskikathrin theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy AT holtdirkannette theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy AT maasrainer theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy AT ebertstella theprevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy AT papaveroluca prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy AT alinawar prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy AT schawjinskikathrin prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy AT holtdirkannette prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy AT maasrainer prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy AT ebertstella prevalenceofredundantnerverootsinstandingpositionalmridecreasesbyhalfinsupineandalmosttozeroinflexedseatedpositionaretrospectivecrosssectionalcohortstudy |