Cargando…
The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work?
Purpose The Readiness for Return to Work (RRTW) scale is used to evaluate workers’ readiness to resume work after sick leave. Previous research has questioned the RRTW scale’s constructs and stages. The aim of this study was to assess the unidimensionality of the RRTW scale and its six subscales by...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34657201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-10009-4 |
_version_ | 1784811577350815744 |
---|---|
author | Aasdahl, Lene Fimland, Marius Steiro Røe, Cecilie |
author_facet | Aasdahl, Lene Fimland, Marius Steiro Røe, Cecilie |
author_sort | Aasdahl, Lene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose The Readiness for Return to Work (RRTW) scale is used to evaluate workers’ readiness to resume work after sick leave. Previous research has questioned the RRTW scale’s constructs and stages. The aim of this study was to assess the unidimensionality of the RRTW scale and its six subscales by evaluating its fit to the Rasch model, and furthermore to assess if Rasch-based scaling would improve its predictive value, compared with the conventional use of the scale. Methods A prospective cohort study with 12 months of follow-up. Individuals (n = 397) sick-listed due to musculoskeletal, unspecified, or common mental health disorders undergoing rehabilitation were included: 191 were full-time sick-listed (not working), and 206 were part-time sick-listed (working). A Rasch analysis was applied to evaluate the measurement properties of the RRTW scale in the working and not working participants at baseline. Linear and logistic regressions were used to assess how well Rasch-based scaling predicted future work participation during the 12 months of follow-up. Results The RRTW subscales had too few items to represent underlying dimensions properly, and the items fitted poorly within the subscales. A constructed variable based on the items that fit together for not working individuals poorly predicted future work participation. The individuals’ scores across stages were disordered, indicating a lack of ordered stages. Conclusions This study reveals poor measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the RRTW scale in individuals with musculoskeletal and common mental disorders, with neither the subscales nor the stages closely associated with return to work. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10926-021-10009-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9576643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95766432022-10-19 The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work? Aasdahl, Lene Fimland, Marius Steiro Røe, Cecilie J Occup Rehabil Article Purpose The Readiness for Return to Work (RRTW) scale is used to evaluate workers’ readiness to resume work after sick leave. Previous research has questioned the RRTW scale’s constructs and stages. The aim of this study was to assess the unidimensionality of the RRTW scale and its six subscales by evaluating its fit to the Rasch model, and furthermore to assess if Rasch-based scaling would improve its predictive value, compared with the conventional use of the scale. Methods A prospective cohort study with 12 months of follow-up. Individuals (n = 397) sick-listed due to musculoskeletal, unspecified, or common mental health disorders undergoing rehabilitation were included: 191 were full-time sick-listed (not working), and 206 were part-time sick-listed (working). A Rasch analysis was applied to evaluate the measurement properties of the RRTW scale in the working and not working participants at baseline. Linear and logistic regressions were used to assess how well Rasch-based scaling predicted future work participation during the 12 months of follow-up. Results The RRTW subscales had too few items to represent underlying dimensions properly, and the items fitted poorly within the subscales. A constructed variable based on the items that fit together for not working individuals poorly predicted future work participation. The individuals’ scores across stages were disordered, indicating a lack of ordered stages. Conclusions This study reveals poor measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the RRTW scale in individuals with musculoskeletal and common mental disorders, with neither the subscales nor the stages closely associated with return to work. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10926-021-10009-4. Springer US 2021-10-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9576643/ /pubmed/34657201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-10009-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Aasdahl, Lene Fimland, Marius Steiro Røe, Cecilie The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work? |
title | The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work? |
title_full | The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work? |
title_fullStr | The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work? |
title_short | The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work? |
title_sort | readiness for return to work scale; does it help in evaluation of return to work? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34657201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-10009-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aasdahllene thereadinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork AT fimlandmariussteiro thereadinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork AT røececilie thereadinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork AT aasdahllene readinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork AT fimlandmariussteiro readinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork AT røececilie readinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork |