Cargando…

The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work?

Purpose The Readiness for Return to Work (RRTW) scale is used to evaluate workers’ readiness to resume work after sick leave. Previous research has questioned the RRTW scale’s constructs and stages. The aim of this study was to assess the unidimensionality of the RRTW scale and its six subscales by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aasdahl, Lene, Fimland, Marius Steiro, Røe, Cecilie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34657201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-10009-4
_version_ 1784811577350815744
author Aasdahl, Lene
Fimland, Marius Steiro
Røe, Cecilie
author_facet Aasdahl, Lene
Fimland, Marius Steiro
Røe, Cecilie
author_sort Aasdahl, Lene
collection PubMed
description Purpose The Readiness for Return to Work (RRTW) scale is used to evaluate workers’ readiness to resume work after sick leave. Previous research has questioned the RRTW scale’s constructs and stages. The aim of this study was to assess the unidimensionality of the RRTW scale and its six subscales by evaluating its fit to the Rasch model, and furthermore to assess if Rasch-based scaling would improve its predictive value, compared with the conventional use of the scale. Methods A prospective cohort study with 12 months of follow-up. Individuals (n = 397) sick-listed due to musculoskeletal, unspecified, or common mental health disorders undergoing rehabilitation were included: 191 were full-time sick-listed (not working), and 206 were part-time sick-listed (working). A Rasch analysis was applied to evaluate the measurement properties of the RRTW scale in the working and not working participants at baseline. Linear and logistic regressions were used to assess how well Rasch-based scaling predicted future work participation during the 12 months of follow-up. Results The RRTW subscales had too few items to represent underlying dimensions properly, and the items fitted poorly within the subscales. A constructed variable based on the items that fit together for not working individuals poorly predicted future work participation. The individuals’ scores across stages were disordered, indicating a lack of ordered stages. Conclusions This study reveals poor measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the RRTW scale in individuals with musculoskeletal and common mental disorders, with neither the subscales nor the stages closely associated with return to work. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10926-021-10009-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9576643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95766432022-10-19 The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work? Aasdahl, Lene Fimland, Marius Steiro Røe, Cecilie J Occup Rehabil Article Purpose The Readiness for Return to Work (RRTW) scale is used to evaluate workers’ readiness to resume work after sick leave. Previous research has questioned the RRTW scale’s constructs and stages. The aim of this study was to assess the unidimensionality of the RRTW scale and its six subscales by evaluating its fit to the Rasch model, and furthermore to assess if Rasch-based scaling would improve its predictive value, compared with the conventional use of the scale. Methods A prospective cohort study with 12 months of follow-up. Individuals (n = 397) sick-listed due to musculoskeletal, unspecified, or common mental health disorders undergoing rehabilitation were included: 191 were full-time sick-listed (not working), and 206 were part-time sick-listed (working). A Rasch analysis was applied to evaluate the measurement properties of the RRTW scale in the working and not working participants at baseline. Linear and logistic regressions were used to assess how well Rasch-based scaling predicted future work participation during the 12 months of follow-up. Results The RRTW subscales had too few items to represent underlying dimensions properly, and the items fitted poorly within the subscales. A constructed variable based on the items that fit together for not working individuals poorly predicted future work participation. The individuals’ scores across stages were disordered, indicating a lack of ordered stages. Conclusions This study reveals poor measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the RRTW scale in individuals with musculoskeletal and common mental disorders, with neither the subscales nor the stages closely associated with return to work. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10926-021-10009-4. Springer US 2021-10-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9576643/ /pubmed/34657201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-10009-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Aasdahl, Lene
Fimland, Marius Steiro
Røe, Cecilie
The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work?
title The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work?
title_full The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work?
title_fullStr The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work?
title_full_unstemmed The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work?
title_short The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work?
title_sort readiness for return to work scale; does it help in evaluation of return to work?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34657201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-10009-4
work_keys_str_mv AT aasdahllene thereadinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork
AT fimlandmariussteiro thereadinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork
AT røececilie thereadinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork
AT aasdahllene readinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork
AT fimlandmariussteiro readinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork
AT røececilie readinessforreturntoworkscaledoesithelpinevaluationofreturntowork