Cargando…

Comparing three types of data-driven models for monthly evapotranspiration prediction under heterogeneous climatic conditions

Evapotranspiration is one of the most important hydro-climatological components which directly affects agricultural productions. Therefore, its forecasting is critical for water managers and irrigation planners. In this study, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model has been hybridized b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aghelpour, Pouya, Varshavian, Vahid, Khodamorad Pour, Mehraneh, Hamedi, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22272-3
_version_ 1784811603096502272
author Aghelpour, Pouya
Varshavian, Vahid
Khodamorad Pour, Mehraneh
Hamedi, Zahra
author_facet Aghelpour, Pouya
Varshavian, Vahid
Khodamorad Pour, Mehraneh
Hamedi, Zahra
author_sort Aghelpour, Pouya
collection PubMed
description Evapotranspiration is one of the most important hydro-climatological components which directly affects agricultural productions. Therefore, its forecasting is critical for water managers and irrigation planners. In this study, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model has been hybridized by differential evolution (DE) optimization algorithm as a novel approach to forecast monthly reference evapotranspiration (ET0). Furthermore, this model has been compared with the classic stochastic time series model. For this, the ET0 rates were calculated on a monthly scale during 1995–2018, based on FAO-56 Penman–Monteith equation and meteorological data including minimum air temperature, maximum air temperature, mean air temperature, minimum relative humidity, maximum relative humidity & sunshine duration. The investigation was performed on 6 stations in different climates of Iran, including Bandar Anzali & Ramsar (per-humid), Gharakhil (sub-humid), Shiraz (semi-arid), Ahwaz (arid), and Yazd (extra-arid). The models’ performances were evaluated by the criteria percent bias (PB), root mean squared error (RMSE), normalized RMSE (NRMSE), and Nash-Sutcliff (NS) coefficient. Surveys confirm the high capability of the hybrid ANFIS-DE model in monthly ET0 forecasting; so that the DE algorithm was able to improve the accuracy of ANFIS, by 16% on average. Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) was the most suitable pattern among the time series stochastic models and superior to its competitors, ANFIS and ANFIS-DE. Consequently, the SARIMA was suggested more appropriate for monthly ET0 forecasting in all the climates, due to its simplicity and parsimony. Comparison between the different climates confirmed that the climate type significantly affects the forecasting accuracies: it’s revealed that all the models work better in extra-arid, arid and semi-arid climates, than the humid and per-humid areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9576755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95767552022-10-19 Comparing three types of data-driven models for monthly evapotranspiration prediction under heterogeneous climatic conditions Aghelpour, Pouya Varshavian, Vahid Khodamorad Pour, Mehraneh Hamedi, Zahra Sci Rep Article Evapotranspiration is one of the most important hydro-climatological components which directly affects agricultural productions. Therefore, its forecasting is critical for water managers and irrigation planners. In this study, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model has been hybridized by differential evolution (DE) optimization algorithm as a novel approach to forecast monthly reference evapotranspiration (ET0). Furthermore, this model has been compared with the classic stochastic time series model. For this, the ET0 rates were calculated on a monthly scale during 1995–2018, based on FAO-56 Penman–Monteith equation and meteorological data including minimum air temperature, maximum air temperature, mean air temperature, minimum relative humidity, maximum relative humidity & sunshine duration. The investigation was performed on 6 stations in different climates of Iran, including Bandar Anzali & Ramsar (per-humid), Gharakhil (sub-humid), Shiraz (semi-arid), Ahwaz (arid), and Yazd (extra-arid). The models’ performances were evaluated by the criteria percent bias (PB), root mean squared error (RMSE), normalized RMSE (NRMSE), and Nash-Sutcliff (NS) coefficient. Surveys confirm the high capability of the hybrid ANFIS-DE model in monthly ET0 forecasting; so that the DE algorithm was able to improve the accuracy of ANFIS, by 16% on average. Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) was the most suitable pattern among the time series stochastic models and superior to its competitors, ANFIS and ANFIS-DE. Consequently, the SARIMA was suggested more appropriate for monthly ET0 forecasting in all the climates, due to its simplicity and parsimony. Comparison between the different climates confirmed that the climate type significantly affects the forecasting accuracies: it’s revealed that all the models work better in extra-arid, arid and semi-arid climates, than the humid and per-humid areas. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9576755/ /pubmed/36253432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22272-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Aghelpour, Pouya
Varshavian, Vahid
Khodamorad Pour, Mehraneh
Hamedi, Zahra
Comparing three types of data-driven models for monthly evapotranspiration prediction under heterogeneous climatic conditions
title Comparing three types of data-driven models for monthly evapotranspiration prediction under heterogeneous climatic conditions
title_full Comparing three types of data-driven models for monthly evapotranspiration prediction under heterogeneous climatic conditions
title_fullStr Comparing three types of data-driven models for monthly evapotranspiration prediction under heterogeneous climatic conditions
title_full_unstemmed Comparing three types of data-driven models for monthly evapotranspiration prediction under heterogeneous climatic conditions
title_short Comparing three types of data-driven models for monthly evapotranspiration prediction under heterogeneous climatic conditions
title_sort comparing three types of data-driven models for monthly evapotranspiration prediction under heterogeneous climatic conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22272-3
work_keys_str_mv AT aghelpourpouya comparingthreetypesofdatadrivenmodelsformonthlyevapotranspirationpredictionunderheterogeneousclimaticconditions
AT varshavianvahid comparingthreetypesofdatadrivenmodelsformonthlyevapotranspirationpredictionunderheterogeneousclimaticconditions
AT khodamoradpourmehraneh comparingthreetypesofdatadrivenmodelsformonthlyevapotranspirationpredictionunderheterogeneousclimaticconditions
AT hamedizahra comparingthreetypesofdatadrivenmodelsformonthlyevapotranspirationpredictionunderheterogeneousclimaticconditions