Cargando…
An analysis of pathologists’ viewing processes as they diagnose whole slide digital images
Although pathologists have their own viewing habits while diagnosing, viewing behaviors leading to the most accurate diagnoses are under-investigated. Digital whole slide imaging has enabled investigators to analyze pathologists’ visual interpretation of histopathological features using mouse and vi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36268085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100104 |
_version_ | 1784811650322268160 |
---|---|
author | Ghezloo, Fatemeh Wang, Pin-Chieh Kerr, Kathleen F. Brunyé, Tad T. Drew, Trafton Chang, Oliver H. Reisch, Lisa M. Shapiro, Linda G. Elmore, Joann G. |
author_facet | Ghezloo, Fatemeh Wang, Pin-Chieh Kerr, Kathleen F. Brunyé, Tad T. Drew, Trafton Chang, Oliver H. Reisch, Lisa M. Shapiro, Linda G. Elmore, Joann G. |
author_sort | Ghezloo, Fatemeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although pathologists have their own viewing habits while diagnosing, viewing behaviors leading to the most accurate diagnoses are under-investigated. Digital whole slide imaging has enabled investigators to analyze pathologists’ visual interpretation of histopathological features using mouse and viewport tracking techniques. In this study, we provide definitions for basic viewing behavior variables and investigate the association of pathologists' characteristics and viewing behaviors, and how they relate to diagnostic accuracy when interpreting whole slide images. We use recordings of 32 pathologists’ actions while interpreting a set of 36 digital whole slide skin biopsy images (5 sets of 36 cases; 180 cases total). These viewport tracking data include the coordinates of a viewport scene on pathologists’ screens, the magnification level at which that viewport was viewed, as well as a timestamp. We define a set of variables to quantify pathologists' viewing behaviors such as zooming, panning, and interacting with a consensus reference panel’s selected region of interest (ROI). We examine the association of these viewing behaviors with pathologists’ demographics, clinical characteristics, and diagnostic accuracy using cross-classified multilevel models. Viewing behaviors differ based on clinical experience of the pathologists. Pathologists with a higher caseload of melanocytic skin biopsy cases and pathologists with board certification and/or fellowship training in dermatopathology have lower average zoom and lower variance of zoom levels. Viewing behaviors associated with higher diagnostic accuracy include higher average and variance of zoom levels, a lower magnification percentage (a measure of consecutive zooming behavior), higher total interpretation time, and higher amount of time spent viewing ROIs. Scanning behavior, which refers to panning with a fixed zoom level, has marginally significant positive association with accuracy. Pathologists’ training, clinical experience, and their exposure to a range of cases are associated with their viewing behaviors, which may contribute to their diagnostic accuracy. Research in computational pathology integrating digital imaging and clinical informatics opens up new avenues for leveraging viewing behaviors in medical education and training, potentially improving patient care and the effectiveness of clinical workflow. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9576972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95769722022-10-19 An analysis of pathologists’ viewing processes as they diagnose whole slide digital images Ghezloo, Fatemeh Wang, Pin-Chieh Kerr, Kathleen F. Brunyé, Tad T. Drew, Trafton Chang, Oliver H. Reisch, Lisa M. Shapiro, Linda G. Elmore, Joann G. J Pathol Inform Original Research Article Although pathologists have their own viewing habits while diagnosing, viewing behaviors leading to the most accurate diagnoses are under-investigated. Digital whole slide imaging has enabled investigators to analyze pathologists’ visual interpretation of histopathological features using mouse and viewport tracking techniques. In this study, we provide definitions for basic viewing behavior variables and investigate the association of pathologists' characteristics and viewing behaviors, and how they relate to diagnostic accuracy when interpreting whole slide images. We use recordings of 32 pathologists’ actions while interpreting a set of 36 digital whole slide skin biopsy images (5 sets of 36 cases; 180 cases total). These viewport tracking data include the coordinates of a viewport scene on pathologists’ screens, the magnification level at which that viewport was viewed, as well as a timestamp. We define a set of variables to quantify pathologists' viewing behaviors such as zooming, panning, and interacting with a consensus reference panel’s selected region of interest (ROI). We examine the association of these viewing behaviors with pathologists’ demographics, clinical characteristics, and diagnostic accuracy using cross-classified multilevel models. Viewing behaviors differ based on clinical experience of the pathologists. Pathologists with a higher caseload of melanocytic skin biopsy cases and pathologists with board certification and/or fellowship training in dermatopathology have lower average zoom and lower variance of zoom levels. Viewing behaviors associated with higher diagnostic accuracy include higher average and variance of zoom levels, a lower magnification percentage (a measure of consecutive zooming behavior), higher total interpretation time, and higher amount of time spent viewing ROIs. Scanning behavior, which refers to panning with a fixed zoom level, has marginally significant positive association with accuracy. Pathologists’ training, clinical experience, and their exposure to a range of cases are associated with their viewing behaviors, which may contribute to their diagnostic accuracy. Research in computational pathology integrating digital imaging and clinical informatics opens up new avenues for leveraging viewing behaviors in medical education and training, potentially improving patient care and the effectiveness of clinical workflow. Elsevier 2022-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9576972/ /pubmed/36268085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100104 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Ghezloo, Fatemeh Wang, Pin-Chieh Kerr, Kathleen F. Brunyé, Tad T. Drew, Trafton Chang, Oliver H. Reisch, Lisa M. Shapiro, Linda G. Elmore, Joann G. An analysis of pathologists’ viewing processes as they diagnose whole slide digital images |
title | An analysis of pathologists’ viewing processes as they diagnose whole slide digital images |
title_full | An analysis of pathologists’ viewing processes as they diagnose whole slide digital images |
title_fullStr | An analysis of pathologists’ viewing processes as they diagnose whole slide digital images |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of pathologists’ viewing processes as they diagnose whole slide digital images |
title_short | An analysis of pathologists’ viewing processes as they diagnose whole slide digital images |
title_sort | analysis of pathologists’ viewing processes as they diagnose whole slide digital images |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36268085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghezloofatemeh ananalysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT wangpinchieh ananalysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT kerrkathleenf ananalysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT brunyetadt ananalysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT drewtrafton ananalysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT changoliverh ananalysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT reischlisam ananalysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT shapirolindag ananalysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT elmorejoanng ananalysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT ghezloofatemeh analysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT wangpinchieh analysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT kerrkathleenf analysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT brunyetadt analysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT drewtrafton analysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT changoliverh analysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT reischlisam analysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT shapirolindag analysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages AT elmorejoanng analysisofpathologistsviewingprocessesastheydiagnosewholeslidedigitalimages |