Cargando…

Attention-guided sampling for colorectal cancer analysis with digital pathology

Improvements to patient care through the development of automated image analysis in pathology are restricted by the small image patch size that can be processed by convolutional neural networks (CNNs), when compared to the whole-slide image (WSI). Tile-by-tile processing across the entire WSI is slo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Broad, Andrew, Wright, Alexander I., de Kamps, Marc, Treanor, Darren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9577057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36268074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100110
_version_ 1784811671541252096
author Broad, Andrew
Wright, Alexander I.
de Kamps, Marc
Treanor, Darren
author_facet Broad, Andrew
Wright, Alexander I.
de Kamps, Marc
Treanor, Darren
author_sort Broad, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Improvements to patient care through the development of automated image analysis in pathology are restricted by the small image patch size that can be processed by convolutional neural networks (CNNs), when compared to the whole-slide image (WSI). Tile-by-tile processing across the entire WSI is slow and inefficient. While this may improve with future computing power, the technique remains vulnerable to noise from uninformative image areas. We propose a novel attention-inspired algorithm that selects image patches from informative parts of the WSI, first using a sparse randomised grid pattern, then iteratively re-sampling at higher density in regions where a CNN classifies patches as tumour. Subsequent uniform sampling across the enclosing region of interest (ROI) is used to mitigate sampling bias. Benchmarking tests informed the adoption of VGG19 as the main CNN architecture, with 79% classification accuracy. A further CNN was trained to separate false-positive normal epithelium from tumour epithelium, in a novel adaptation of a two-stage model used in brain imaging. These subsystems were combined in a processing pipeline to generate spatial distributions of classified patches from unseen WSIs. The ROI was predicted with a mean F1 (Dice) score of 86.6% over 100 evaluation WSIs. Several algorithms for evaluating tumour–stroma ratio (TSR) within the ROI were compared, giving a lowest root mean square (RMS) error of 11.3% relative to pathologists’ annotations, against 13.5% for an equivalent tile-by-tile pipeline. Our pipeline processed WSIs between 3.3x and 6.3x faster than tile-by-tile processing. We propose our attention-based sampling pipeline as a useful tool for pathology researchers, with the further potential for incorporating additional diagnostic calculations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9577057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95770572022-10-19 Attention-guided sampling for colorectal cancer analysis with digital pathology Broad, Andrew Wright, Alexander I. de Kamps, Marc Treanor, Darren J Pathol Inform Original Research Article Improvements to patient care through the development of automated image analysis in pathology are restricted by the small image patch size that can be processed by convolutional neural networks (CNNs), when compared to the whole-slide image (WSI). Tile-by-tile processing across the entire WSI is slow and inefficient. While this may improve with future computing power, the technique remains vulnerable to noise from uninformative image areas. We propose a novel attention-inspired algorithm that selects image patches from informative parts of the WSI, first using a sparse randomised grid pattern, then iteratively re-sampling at higher density in regions where a CNN classifies patches as tumour. Subsequent uniform sampling across the enclosing region of interest (ROI) is used to mitigate sampling bias. Benchmarking tests informed the adoption of VGG19 as the main CNN architecture, with 79% classification accuracy. A further CNN was trained to separate false-positive normal epithelium from tumour epithelium, in a novel adaptation of a two-stage model used in brain imaging. These subsystems were combined in a processing pipeline to generate spatial distributions of classified patches from unseen WSIs. The ROI was predicted with a mean F1 (Dice) score of 86.6% over 100 evaluation WSIs. Several algorithms for evaluating tumour–stroma ratio (TSR) within the ROI were compared, giving a lowest root mean square (RMS) error of 11.3% relative to pathologists’ annotations, against 13.5% for an equivalent tile-by-tile pipeline. Our pipeline processed WSIs between 3.3x and 6.3x faster than tile-by-tile processing. We propose our attention-based sampling pipeline as a useful tool for pathology researchers, with the further potential for incorporating additional diagnostic calculations. Elsevier 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9577057/ /pubmed/36268074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100110 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Broad, Andrew
Wright, Alexander I.
de Kamps, Marc
Treanor, Darren
Attention-guided sampling for colorectal cancer analysis with digital pathology
title Attention-guided sampling for colorectal cancer analysis with digital pathology
title_full Attention-guided sampling for colorectal cancer analysis with digital pathology
title_fullStr Attention-guided sampling for colorectal cancer analysis with digital pathology
title_full_unstemmed Attention-guided sampling for colorectal cancer analysis with digital pathology
title_short Attention-guided sampling for colorectal cancer analysis with digital pathology
title_sort attention-guided sampling for colorectal cancer analysis with digital pathology
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9577057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36268074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100110
work_keys_str_mv AT broadandrew attentionguidedsamplingforcolorectalcanceranalysiswithdigitalpathology
AT wrightalexanderi attentionguidedsamplingforcolorectalcanceranalysiswithdigitalpathology
AT dekampsmarc attentionguidedsamplingforcolorectalcanceranalysiswithdigitalpathology
AT treanordarren attentionguidedsamplingforcolorectalcanceranalysiswithdigitalpathology