Cargando…
A performance evaluation study: Variant annotation tools - the enigma of clinical next generation sequencing (NGS) based genetic testing
Dramatically expanding our ability for clinical genetic testing for inherited conditions and complex diseases such as cancer, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are allowing for rapid interrogation of thousands of genes and identification of millions of variants. Variant annotation, the p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9577137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36268089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100130 |
_version_ | 1784811690819321856 |
---|---|
author | Tuteja, Sachleen Kadri, Sabah Yap, Kai Lee |
author_facet | Tuteja, Sachleen Kadri, Sabah Yap, Kai Lee |
author_sort | Tuteja, Sachleen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dramatically expanding our ability for clinical genetic testing for inherited conditions and complex diseases such as cancer, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are allowing for rapid interrogation of thousands of genes and identification of millions of variants. Variant annotation, the process of assigning functional information to DNA variants based on the standardized Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) nomenclature, is a fundamental challenge in the analysis of NGS data that has led to the development of many bioinformatic algorithms. In this study, we evaluated the performance of 3 variant annotation tools: Alamut® Batch, Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP), and ANNOVAR, benchmarked by a manually curated ground-truth set of 298 variants from the medical exome database at the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory at Lurie Children's Hospital. Of the 3 tools, VEP produces the most accurate variant annotations (HGVS nomenclature for 297 of the 298 variants) due to usage of updated gene transcript versions within the algorithm. Alamut® Batch called 296 of the 298 variants correctly; strikingly, ANNOVAR exhibited the greatest number of discrepancies (20 of the 298 variants, 93.3% concordance with ground-truth set). Adoption of validated methods of variant annotation is critical in post-analytical phases of clinical testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9577137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95771372022-10-19 A performance evaluation study: Variant annotation tools - the enigma of clinical next generation sequencing (NGS) based genetic testing Tuteja, Sachleen Kadri, Sabah Yap, Kai Lee J Pathol Inform Short Communication Dramatically expanding our ability for clinical genetic testing for inherited conditions and complex diseases such as cancer, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are allowing for rapid interrogation of thousands of genes and identification of millions of variants. Variant annotation, the process of assigning functional information to DNA variants based on the standardized Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) nomenclature, is a fundamental challenge in the analysis of NGS data that has led to the development of many bioinformatic algorithms. In this study, we evaluated the performance of 3 variant annotation tools: Alamut® Batch, Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP), and ANNOVAR, benchmarked by a manually curated ground-truth set of 298 variants from the medical exome database at the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory at Lurie Children's Hospital. Of the 3 tools, VEP produces the most accurate variant annotations (HGVS nomenclature for 297 of the 298 variants) due to usage of updated gene transcript versions within the algorithm. Alamut® Batch called 296 of the 298 variants correctly; strikingly, ANNOVAR exhibited the greatest number of discrepancies (20 of the 298 variants, 93.3% concordance with ground-truth set). Adoption of validated methods of variant annotation is critical in post-analytical phases of clinical testing. Elsevier 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9577137/ /pubmed/36268089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100130 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Tuteja, Sachleen Kadri, Sabah Yap, Kai Lee A performance evaluation study: Variant annotation tools - the enigma of clinical next generation sequencing (NGS) based genetic testing |
title | A performance evaluation study: Variant annotation tools - the enigma of clinical next generation sequencing (NGS) based genetic testing |
title_full | A performance evaluation study: Variant annotation tools - the enigma of clinical next generation sequencing (NGS) based genetic testing |
title_fullStr | A performance evaluation study: Variant annotation tools - the enigma of clinical next generation sequencing (NGS) based genetic testing |
title_full_unstemmed | A performance evaluation study: Variant annotation tools - the enigma of clinical next generation sequencing (NGS) based genetic testing |
title_short | A performance evaluation study: Variant annotation tools - the enigma of clinical next generation sequencing (NGS) based genetic testing |
title_sort | performance evaluation study: variant annotation tools - the enigma of clinical next generation sequencing (ngs) based genetic testing |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9577137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36268089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tutejasachleen aperformanceevaluationstudyvariantannotationtoolstheenigmaofclinicalnextgenerationsequencingngsbasedgenetictesting AT kadrisabah aperformanceevaluationstudyvariantannotationtoolstheenigmaofclinicalnextgenerationsequencingngsbasedgenetictesting AT yapkailee aperformanceevaluationstudyvariantannotationtoolstheenigmaofclinicalnextgenerationsequencingngsbasedgenetictesting AT tutejasachleen performanceevaluationstudyvariantannotationtoolstheenigmaofclinicalnextgenerationsequencingngsbasedgenetictesting AT kadrisabah performanceevaluationstudyvariantannotationtoolstheenigmaofclinicalnextgenerationsequencingngsbasedgenetictesting AT yapkailee performanceevaluationstudyvariantannotationtoolstheenigmaofclinicalnextgenerationsequencingngsbasedgenetictesting |