Cargando…

Standardization and validation of a conventional high yield platelet-rich plasma preparation protocol

BACKGROUND: Of late, numerous randomised controlled trials report platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to be ineffective with preparation protocols of low platelet yield despite using expensive commercial PRP kits. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify and standardize a preparation protocol for PRP with maxi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muthu, Sathish, Krishnan, Anand, Ramanathan, Karthik Raja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9577528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36268335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104593
_version_ 1784811774693867520
author Muthu, Sathish
Krishnan, Anand
Ramanathan, Karthik Raja
author_facet Muthu, Sathish
Krishnan, Anand
Ramanathan, Karthik Raja
author_sort Muthu, Sathish
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Of late, numerous randomised controlled trials report platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to be ineffective with preparation protocols of low platelet yield despite using expensive commercial PRP kits. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify and standardize a preparation protocol for PRP with maximum platelets yield and concentration to obtain favourable results without the use of commercial preparation kits. MATERIALS & METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 40 healthy volunteers who signed informed consent for participation in the study. The double spin protocol of PRP preparation was analyzed for variables such as centrifugal acceleration, time, and volume of blood processed and final product utilized. The final PRP prepared was investigated for platelet recovery, concentration, integrity, and viability. Each protocol investigated with technical and biological duplicates to avoid reporting and sampling bias. RESULTS: We noted maximum platelet recovery (86–99%) with a consistent 6.4 ± 0.8 times the baseline concentration of platelets with first centrifugation at 100g for 15 min followed by second centrifugation at 1600g for 20 min. We did not note a loss of integrity or viability of the platelets in the final product from the above-said protocol. We also validated the protocol among all the study participants demonstrating consistency. CONCLUSION: The preparation of PRP by the double-spin protocol using 10 ml of blood at 100 g followed by 1600 g for 15 and 20 min respectively in a 15 ml tube and using the lower 1/3rd of the final product demonstrated consistent high platelet recovery (86–99%) and concentration (6x) without disturbing the platelet integrity or viability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9577528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95775282022-10-19 Standardization and validation of a conventional high yield platelet-rich plasma preparation protocol Muthu, Sathish Krishnan, Anand Ramanathan, Karthik Raja Ann Med Surg (Lond) Experimental Research BACKGROUND: Of late, numerous randomised controlled trials report platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to be ineffective with preparation protocols of low platelet yield despite using expensive commercial PRP kits. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify and standardize a preparation protocol for PRP with maximum platelets yield and concentration to obtain favourable results without the use of commercial preparation kits. MATERIALS & METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 40 healthy volunteers who signed informed consent for participation in the study. The double spin protocol of PRP preparation was analyzed for variables such as centrifugal acceleration, time, and volume of blood processed and final product utilized. The final PRP prepared was investigated for platelet recovery, concentration, integrity, and viability. Each protocol investigated with technical and biological duplicates to avoid reporting and sampling bias. RESULTS: We noted maximum platelet recovery (86–99%) with a consistent 6.4 ± 0.8 times the baseline concentration of platelets with first centrifugation at 100g for 15 min followed by second centrifugation at 1600g for 20 min. We did not note a loss of integrity or viability of the platelets in the final product from the above-said protocol. We also validated the protocol among all the study participants demonstrating consistency. CONCLUSION: The preparation of PRP by the double-spin protocol using 10 ml of blood at 100 g followed by 1600 g for 15 and 20 min respectively in a 15 ml tube and using the lower 1/3rd of the final product demonstrated consistent high platelet recovery (86–99%) and concentration (6x) without disturbing the platelet integrity or viability. Elsevier 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9577528/ /pubmed/36268335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104593 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Experimental Research
Muthu, Sathish
Krishnan, Anand
Ramanathan, Karthik Raja
Standardization and validation of a conventional high yield platelet-rich plasma preparation protocol
title Standardization and validation of a conventional high yield platelet-rich plasma preparation protocol
title_full Standardization and validation of a conventional high yield platelet-rich plasma preparation protocol
title_fullStr Standardization and validation of a conventional high yield platelet-rich plasma preparation protocol
title_full_unstemmed Standardization and validation of a conventional high yield platelet-rich plasma preparation protocol
title_short Standardization and validation of a conventional high yield platelet-rich plasma preparation protocol
title_sort standardization and validation of a conventional high yield platelet-rich plasma preparation protocol
topic Experimental Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9577528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36268335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104593
work_keys_str_mv AT muthusathish standardizationandvalidationofaconventionalhighyieldplateletrichplasmapreparationprotocol
AT krishnananand standardizationandvalidationofaconventionalhighyieldplateletrichplasmapreparationprotocol
AT ramanathankarthikraja standardizationandvalidationofaconventionalhighyieldplateletrichplasmapreparationprotocol